All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  What is the primary reason mentioned in the t... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
What is the primary reason mentioned in the text for not involving the Indian Army in counter-Naxal operations?
  • a)
    The Indian Army lacks the necessary training for such operations.
  • b)
    The Indian Army is already engaged in external conflicts.
  • c)
    The Indian Army is unwilling to participate in internal operations.
  • d)
    The Indian Army does not have the required manpower.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
What is the primary reason mentioned in the text for not involving the...
The text suggests that one of the primary reasons for not involving the Indian Army in counter-Naxal operations is that the Indian Army is already engaged in external conflicts, and using it internally would make India's frontiers vulnerable.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

In the 2006 Common Wealth games, there was participation from five different countries - USA, China, UK, Australia and Japan. From each of these five countries there were athletes participating in one of the five following events: shot put, javelin, high jump, long jump and marathon. Each participant was allowed to participate in exactly one of the five events.Further it is known that there were at least two participants and at most ten participants from each country and the total number of participants from all the five countries put together was a perfect square.The following information is also available:I. The number of participants in javelin was exactly half the number of participants in each of the other events.II. USA sent an equal number of participants in shot put, high jump and long jump.III. The maximum number of participants sent by Japan is for the long jump event and each country sent at least one participant for the long jump and shot put events.IV. The number of participants from China was two more than that from USA, which in turn was one more than that from UK, which in turn was one more than that from Australia which in turn was one more than that from Japan.V. Except Japan, all the other countries sent at least one participant for the javelin event while Japan sent at least one participant in each of the remaining events.VI. The number of participants sent by China for each of the events was different and there were no participants from China for the high jump event.VII. The number of participants in the marathon event sent by all the other countries other than China is equal.Q. How many countries did not send even a single participant in any one event?

In the 2006 Common Wealth games, there was participation from five different countries - USA, China, UK, Australia and Japan. From each of these five countries there were athletes participating in one of the five following events: shot put, javelin, high jump, long jump and marathon. Each participant was allowed to participate in exactly one of the five events.Further it is known that there were at least two participants and at most ten participants from each country and the total number of participants from all the five countries put together was a perfect square.The following information is also available:I. The number of participants in javelin was exactly half the number of participants in each of the other events.II. USA sent an equal number of participants in shot put, high jump and long jump.III. The maximum number of participants sent by Japan is for the long jump event and each country sent at least one participant for the long jump and shot put events.IV. The number of participants from China was two more than that from USA, which in turn was one more than that from UK, which in turn was one more than that from Australia which in turn was one more than that from Japan.V. Except Japan, all the other countries sent at least one participant for the javelin event while Japan sent at least one participant in each of the remaining events.VI. The number of participants sent by China for each of the events was different and there were no participants from China for the high jump event.VII. The number of participants in the marathon event sent by all the other countries other than China is equal.Q. Considering all the participants sent by the five countries put together, how many instances were there wherein exactly one participant was sent by a country for an event?

In the 2006 Common Wealth games, there was participation from five different countries - USA, China, UK, Australia and Japan. From each of these five countries there were athletes participating in one of the five following events: shot put, javelin, high jump, long jump and marathon. Each participant was allowed to participate in exactly one of the five events.Further it is known that there were at least two participants and at most ten participants from each country and the total number of participants from all the five countries put together was a perfect square.The following information is also available:I. The number of participants in javelin was exactly half the number of participants in each of the other events.II. USA sent an equal number of participants in shot put, high jump and long jump.III. The maximum number of participants sent by Japan is for the long jump event and each country sent at least one participant for the long jump and shot put events.IV. The number of participants from China was two more than that from USA, which in turn was one more than that from UK, which in turn was one more than that from Australia which in turn was one more than that from Japan.V. Except Japan, all the other countries sent at least one participant for the javelin event while Japan sent at least one participant in each of the remaining events.VI. The number of participants sent by China for each of the events was different and there were no participants from China for the high jump event.VII. The number of participants in the marathon event sent by all the other countries other than China is equal.Q. Which country sent the maximum number of participants for the high jump event?

In the 2006 Common Wealth games, there was participation from five different countries - USA, China, UK, Australia and Japan. From each of these five countries there were athletes participating in one of the five following events: shot put, javelin, high jump, long jump and marathon. Each participant was allowed to participate in exactly one of the five events.Further it is known that there were at least two participants and at most ten participants from each country and the total number of participants from all the five countries put together was a perfect square.The following information is also available:I. The number of participants in javelin was exactly half the number of participants in each of the other events.II. USA sent an equal number of participants in shot put, high jump and long jump.III. The maximum number of participants sent by Japan is for the long jump event and each country sent at least one participant for the long jump and shot put events.IV. The number of participants from China was two more than that from USA, which in turn was one more than that from UK, which in turn was one more than that from Australia which in turn was one more than that from Japan.V. Except Japan, all the other countries sent at least one participant for the javelin event while Japan sent at least one participant in each of the remaining events.VI. The number of participants sent by China for each of the events was different and there were no participants from China for the high jump event.VII. The number of participants in the marathon event sent by all the other countries other than China is equal.Q. Which among the following is definitely FALSE?

Top Courses for UPSCView all

Top Courses for UPSC

What is the primary reason mentioned in the text for not involving the Indian Army in counter-Naxal operations?a)The Indian Army lacks the necessary training for such operations.b)The Indian Army is already engaged in external conflicts.c)The Indian Army is unwilling to participate in internal operations.d)The Indian Army does not have the required manpower.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
What is the primary reason mentioned in the text for not involving the Indian Army in counter-Naxal operations?a)The Indian Army lacks the necessary training for such operations.b)The Indian Army is already engaged in external conflicts.c)The Indian Army is unwilling to participate in internal operations.d)The Indian Army does not have the required manpower.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about What is the primary reason mentioned in the text for not involving the Indian Army in counter-Naxal operations?a)The Indian Army lacks the necessary training for such operations.b)The Indian Army is already engaged in external conflicts.c)The Indian Army is unwilling to participate in internal operations.d)The Indian Army does not have the required manpower.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What is the primary reason mentioned in the text for not involving the Indian Army in counter-Naxal operations?a)The Indian Army lacks the necessary training for such operations.b)The Indian Army is already engaged in external conflicts.c)The Indian Army is unwilling to participate in internal operations.d)The Indian Army does not have the required manpower.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for What is the primary reason mentioned in the text for not involving the Indian Army in counter-Naxal operations?a)The Indian Army lacks the necessary training for such operations.b)The Indian Army is already engaged in external conflicts.c)The Indian Army is unwilling to participate in internal operations.d)The Indian Army does not have the required manpower.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of What is the primary reason mentioned in the text for not involving the Indian Army in counter-Naxal operations?a)The Indian Army lacks the necessary training for such operations.b)The Indian Army is already engaged in external conflicts.c)The Indian Army is unwilling to participate in internal operations.d)The Indian Army does not have the required manpower.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What is the primary reason mentioned in the text for not involving the Indian Army in counter-Naxal operations?a)The Indian Army lacks the necessary training for such operations.b)The Indian Army is already engaged in external conflicts.c)The Indian Army is unwilling to participate in internal operations.d)The Indian Army does not have the required manpower.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What is the primary reason mentioned in the text for not involving the Indian Army in counter-Naxal operations?a)The Indian Army lacks the necessary training for such operations.b)The Indian Army is already engaged in external conflicts.c)The Indian Army is unwilling to participate in internal operations.d)The Indian Army does not have the required manpower.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What is the primary reason mentioned in the text for not involving the Indian Army in counter-Naxal operations?a)The Indian Army lacks the necessary training for such operations.b)The Indian Army is already engaged in external conflicts.c)The Indian Army is unwilling to participate in internal operations.d)The Indian Army does not have the required manpower.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What is the primary reason mentioned in the text for not involving the Indian Army in counter-Naxal operations?a)The Indian Army lacks the necessary training for such operations.b)The Indian Army is already engaged in external conflicts.c)The Indian Army is unwilling to participate in internal operations.d)The Indian Army does not have the required manpower.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup