All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Which of the following is/are the correct exp... Start Learning for Free
Which of the following is/are the correct explanation of Parliamentary Democracy?

  • a)
    Representation of the People

  • b)
    All of the choices are correct

  • c)
    Responsible Government

  • d)
    Accountability of the Council of Ministers to the Legislature

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Verified Answer
Which of the following is/are the correct explanation of Parliamentary...
In short, a parliamentary democracy is a system of government in which citizens elect representatives to a legislative parliament to make the necessary laws and decisions for the country. This parliament directly represents the people.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Passage:Section 35 of the Bill, for instance, empowers the Government to grant a carte blanche authorization to any of its agencies to gather personal data, thereby overriding privacy protections and categorically undermining the two main components required to limit an aspiring surveillance state: accountability and transparency. Privacy protections, the Bill states, can be overridden in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order; or for preventing incitement to the commission of any cognizable offence relating to sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public orderThe Srikrishna Committee’s Draft Bill, on the other hand, permitted surveillance only if “authorised pursuant to a law” and “in accordance with the procedure established by such law” if “necessary for, and proportionate to, such interests being achieved.” This was in line with the judgment in K.S. Puttaswamy v Union of India, which emphasised that infringements upon privacy must meet the global constitutional standards of proportionality. The 2019 Bill eliminates these procedural restraints and does away with parliamentary or judicial oversight. Moreover, while the draft Bill provided such an exemption to the Government only in the interests of the security of the State, the current Bill further enhances the scope and boundaries of the broad scheme of power the Government enjoys.The Government’s sweeping power invokes grave privacy concerns, disregards the procedural and content based mandate of Article 21 of the Constitution, and strikes at the very root of the interpretive advance made in the Privacy judgement.As if this were not unconstitutional enough, the Bill allows the Central Government to collect anonymized “personal” or “non-personal data” from data fiduciaries. Neither term is distinguished nor defined in the bill. This provision is especially alarming in the wake of recent studies, which suggest that no anonymized personal data is protected from reidentification, thus raising a grave concern about confidentiality, privacy, and the ethical use of data. It is hardly a stretch to assume that this Bill, for all practical purposes, might seriously jeopardise the privacy of those set of individuals who espouse political sentiments that the Government may find unfavourable and thereby giving rise to a retributive form of policy making.Another change which is a cause of worry is the substitution of the judicial members in the selection committee, which is responsible for the appointment of the chairperson and the members of the DPAI, as was envisioned in the draft Bill, with the Cabinet Secretary, Law Secretary, and Electronics and Information and Technology Secretary, thereby making it impervious to judicial and expert influence. While the US Supreme Court maintains that judicial authorization is required before the operation of certain kinds of domestic surveillance, the current Bill mentions no such prerequisite. The Bill further fails to grapple effectively against executive overreach and does not stand the scrutiny of the proportionalityjurisprudence, i.e., the principle which seeks to safeguard citizens from excessive Government measures.Q.What could be a potential outcome of not having anonymized data protected from re- identification?

The government and the Opposition are headed on a collision course in the Budget session of Parliament, with the latter planning to move a joint motion demanding a repeal of the three laws that are agitating farmers in much of the country. The confrontation over these laws is a legacy of the last session when they were passed without detailed and proper consultation with political parties, experts and farmer representatives. The session began with around 20 Opposition parties boycotting the President’s address to a joint sitting of Parliament. BSP President Mayawati belatedly announced her party’s decision to also stay away as a mark of protest. The delay clearly outlined her intention to keep a distance from the Opposition bloc, which among others has the Congress and the Samajwadi Party. The boycott indicated a worsening of the relationship between the government and the Opposition. In January 2020, the Opposition had attended the President’s address wearing black bands. The last time the Opposition boycotted the President’s Address was in November 2019 to commemorate the Constitution Day. President Ram Nath Kovind said the government would keep the farm Bills on hold as per a Supreme Court directive but did not indicate any rethink.The government has advantages over the Opposition, in terms of the numerical strength in both Houses of Parliament. With the Tamil Nadu and West Bengal Assembly elections round the corner, two key Opposition parties, the DMK and the Trinamool Congress, are expected to be largely absent, further reducing the Opposition’s strength. The Opposition, despite its united front on the first day of the session, has a record of disintegrating in the face of the BJP’s manoeuvring in previous sessions. There will be discussion on the Motion of Thanks to the President and later on the Budget. As of now there are no indications of the Opposition skipping these events. In legislative business, recent ordinances such as the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, which has provisions to deal with domestic and international arbitration and defines the law for conducting conciliation proceedings, and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021, which is for merging the J&K cadre of All India Services Officers such as the IAS, IPS and the Indian Forest Service with the Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Mizoram Union Territory (AGMUT) cadre, will have to get a parliamentary nod. The government draws its legitimacy from a parliamentary majority, but democratic conduct is more than enforcing the will of the majority. The government’s conduct in Parliament and outside, where its critics are facing the strong arm of the state machinery, should meet the high standards India has set for itself as a democracy.Q. Which of the following is not consistent with the passage?

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.Legal Aid Provides free legal services to the poor and needy peoples who cannot afford the services of a lawyer for the conduct of a case or a legal proceeding in any court, tribunal or before an authority. Legal Aid is the method adopted to ensure that no one is deprived of professional advice and help because of lack of funds. Therefore, the main object is to provide equal justice is to be made available to the poor and weaker section of society.Persons those are entitled to Free Legal Services under the Legal Services Authorities Act are: a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe; a victim of trafficking in human beings or begar as referred to in Article 23 of the Constitution; a woman or a child; a mentally ill or otherwise disabled person; a person under circumstances of undeserved want such as being a victim of a mass disaster, ethnic violence, caste atrocity, flood, drought, earthquake or industrial disaster; or an industrial workman; or in custody, including custody in a protective home or in a juvenile home of in a psychiatric hospital or psychiatric nursing home within the meaning of clause (g) of section 2 of the Mental Health Act, 1987; or a person whose annual income less than rupees fifty thousand or such other higher amount as may be prescribed by the State Government.There are certain objectives of the government to establish a system of the free legal system. And the Right to Free Legal Aid is also mentioned under Article 39A of the Constitution of India.Objectives:Right to Legal Aid in IndiaFree legal aid is necessary for those people as it is written in our Indian constitution under Article 14 that all the people are equal to the justice should also be provided to all persons whether they are rich or poor. Free legal aid is given to the poor who are not able to fight a case against a powerful or a rich person can also get justiceLegal RepresentationLegal representation means that the poor and the weaker section get legal representative as they are also the citizen of India and it is our fundamental right to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. So whether a person is rich or a poor he has the right to have a legal representative so that they can also get free legal aid from the government. It is written under Article 39A of the Constitution of India to give Free legal aid to all the citizen of India.Q. What does "Legal Representation" refer to in the context of the passage?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Which of the following is/are the correct explanation of Parliamentary Democracy?a)Representation of the Peopleb)All of the choices are correctc)Responsible Governmentd)Accountability of the Council of Ministers to the LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which of the following is/are the correct explanation of Parliamentary Democracy?a)Representation of the Peopleb)All of the choices are correctc)Responsible Governmentd)Accountability of the Council of Ministers to the LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Which of the following is/are the correct explanation of Parliamentary Democracy?a)Representation of the Peopleb)All of the choices are correctc)Responsible Governmentd)Accountability of the Council of Ministers to the LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which of the following is/are the correct explanation of Parliamentary Democracy?a)Representation of the Peopleb)All of the choices are correctc)Responsible Governmentd)Accountability of the Council of Ministers to the LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which of the following is/are the correct explanation of Parliamentary Democracy?a)Representation of the Peopleb)All of the choices are correctc)Responsible Governmentd)Accountability of the Council of Ministers to the LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which of the following is/are the correct explanation of Parliamentary Democracy?a)Representation of the Peopleb)All of the choices are correctc)Responsible Governmentd)Accountability of the Council of Ministers to the LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which of the following is/are the correct explanation of Parliamentary Democracy?a)Representation of the Peopleb)All of the choices are correctc)Responsible Governmentd)Accountability of the Council of Ministers to the LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which of the following is/are the correct explanation of Parliamentary Democracy?a)Representation of the Peopleb)All of the choices are correctc)Responsible Governmentd)Accountability of the Council of Ministers to the LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which of the following is/are the correct explanation of Parliamentary Democracy?a)Representation of the Peopleb)All of the choices are correctc)Responsible Governmentd)Accountability of the Council of Ministers to the LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which of the following is/are the correct explanation of Parliamentary Democracy?a)Representation of the Peopleb)All of the choices are correctc)Responsible Governmentd)Accountability of the Council of Ministers to the LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup