All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Tom wasnt reading a book. He ______________ t... Start Learning for Free
Tom wasn't reading a book. He ______________ the dog.
  • a)
    was feeding
  • b)
    fed
  • c)
    was fed
  • d)
    is feeding
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your GMAT doubts with EduRev
Verified Answer
Tom wasnt reading a book. He ______________ the dog.a)was feedingb)fed...

To determine the correct answer, let's analyze the given sentence:
"Tom wasn't reading a book. He ______________ the dog."
1. Subject: The subject of the sentence is "Tom."
2. Verb: The verb phrase in the sentence is missing. We need to find the appropriate verb to complete the sentence.
Options:
A:
was feeding

B:
fed

C:
was fed

D:
is feeding

Let's analyze each option:
A:
was feeding

- This option uses the past continuous tense, which is suitable for the given context. It indicates an ongoing action in the past.
- The sentence will then be: "Tom wasn't reading a book. He was feeding the dog."
B:
fed

- This option uses the simple past tense, which does not fit the context.
- The sentence would be grammatically correct but would not convey the intended meaning.
C:
was fed

- This option uses the past continuous tense passive voice, which does not make sense in this context.
- It implies that someone else was feeding Tom to the dog, which is not the intended meaning.
D:
is feeding

- This option uses the present continuous tense, which does not fit the context.
- The sentence would indicate a current action, not a past action.
Therefore, the correct answer is A:
was feeding
.
- The completed sentence will be: "Tom wasn't reading a book. He was feeding the dog."
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Tom wasnt reading a book. He ______________ the dog.a)was feedingb)fed...
Understanding the Correct Answer: "was feeding"
In the sentence, "Tom wasn't reading a book. He ______________ the dog," the correct answer is option 'A': "was feeding." Here's why:
1. Context of the Actions
- The first part of the sentence indicates that Tom is engaged in an ongoing activity (not reading).
- The use of "wasn't reading" suggests a past continuous action, which means we need a verb form that aligns with this tense.
2. Analyzing the Options
- a) was feeding: This is the past continuous form, indicating that feeding the dog was an ongoing action at the same time Tom was not reading.
- b) fed: This is the simple past form, which implies a completed action. It does not fit well in this context as it does not align with the ongoing aspect established by "wasn't reading."
- c) was fedd: This is grammatically incorrect; "fedd" is not a valid past participle.
- d) is feeding: This is the present continuous form, which doesn’t fit because the context is clearly in the past.
3. Conclusion
- The best choice is "was feeding" since it maintains the continuity of actions in the past. It indicates that while Tom was not reading, he was actively engaged in feeding the dog. This choice properly completes the thought of the sentence by illustrating simultaneous actions in a coherent manner.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

In the 1950s, reading was taught to young children primarily through the use of simple primers depicting the middle-class non-adventures of “Dick and Jane.” Rudolph Fletch’s bestselling 1955 book Why Johnny Can’t Read attacked these primers, calling them “horrible, stupid, insipid, … tasteless little readers” and asserting that such boring stories gave no incentive for children to read on their own and learn to “sound out” each word phonetically.Fletch also bemoaned the fact that there was not a single book in bookstores that first and second graders could read by themselves.In response, a publisher commissioned Theodore Geisel, who wrote children’s books under the pen name “Dr.Seuss,” to write a book that “a first grader can’t put down.” Geisel was given a list of a few hundred words considered important and asked to make a book out of them. Nine months later, Geisel, using only 220 different words, delivered The Cat in the Hat, a whimsical story about two bored children left at home with their talking fish who are suddenly visited by a havoc-creating six-foot-tall talking cat. In addition, Geisel wrote the entire book in a rhyming verse, making it fun to read aloud. The Cat in the Hat was a tremendous success and vaulted Geisel into instant celebrity. Another publisher bet Geisel that he could not write an entire book using only 50 different words. Geisel won the bet by publishing the classic Green Eggs and Ham.The Dr. Seuss books revolutionized the children’s book industry by proving that it was possible to create engaging books with a limited vocabulary. Geisel has been credited with killing off “Dick and Jane,” replacing them with clever rhymes, plot twists and rebellious heroes who do the unexpected. Now one in four American children receives a Dr. Seuss title as his or her first book.Q.The main function of the first paragraph is

In the 1950s, reading was taught to young children primarily through the use of simple primers depicting the middle-class non-adventures of “Dick and Jane.” Rudolph Fletch’s bestselling 1955 book Why Johnny Can’t Read attacked these primers, calling them “horrible, stupid, insipid, … tasteless little readers” and asserting that such boring stories gave no incentive for children to read on their own and learn to “sound out” each word phonetically.Fletch also bemoaned the fact that there was not a single book in bookstores that first and second graders could read by themselves.In response, a publisher commissioned Theodore Geisel, who wrote children’s books under the pen name “Dr.Seuss,” to write a book that “a first grader can’t put down.” Geisel was given a list of a few hundred words considered important and asked to make a book out of them. Nine months later, Geisel, using only 220 different words, delivered The Cat in the Hat, a whimsical story about two bored children left at home with their talking fish who are suddenly visited by a havoc-creating six-foot-tall talking cat. In addition, Geisel wrote the entire book in a rhyming verse, making it fun to read aloud. The Cat in the Hat was a tremendous success and vaulted Geisel into instant celebrity. Another publisher bet Geisel that he could not write an entire book using only 50 different words. Geisel won the bet by publishing the classic Green Eggs and Ham.The Dr. Seuss books revolutionized the children’s book industry by proving that it was possible to create engaging books with a limited vocabulary. Geisel has been credited with killing off “Dick and Jane,” replacing them with clever rhymes, plot twists and rebellious heroes who do the unexpected. Now one in four American children receives a Dr. Seuss title as his or her first book.Q.The author provides a brief synopsis of the plot of The Cat in the Hat primarily in order to

Behind every book review there are two key figures: a book review editor and a reviewer. Editors decide whether a book is reviewed in their publication, when the review appears, how long it is, and who writes the review.When many periodicals feature the same books, this does not prove that the editors of different periodicals have not made individual decisions. Before publication, editors receive news releases and printers proofs of certain books, signifying that the publishers will make special efforts to promote these books. They will be heavily advertised and probably be among the books that most bookstores order in quantity. Not having such books reviewed might give the impression that the editor was caught napping, whereas too many reviews of books that readers will have trouble finding in stores would be inappropriate. Editors can risk having a few of the less popular titles reviewed, but they must consider what will be newsworthy, advertised, and written about elsewhere.If these were the only factors influencing editors, few books that stand little chance of selling well would ever be reviewed. But editors feel some concern about what might endure, and therefore listen to literary experts. A generation ago, a newspaper used a brilliant system of choosing which books to feature. The book review editor sent out a greater number of books than reviews he actually intended to publish. If a review was unenthusiastic, he reasoned that the book was not important enough to be discussed immediately, and if good reviews of enough other books came in, the unenthusiastic review might never be printed. The unenthusiastic reviewers were paid promptly anyway, but they learned that if they wanted their material to be printed, it was advisable to be kind.Most editors print favorable and unfavorable reviews; however, the content of the review may be influenced by the editor. Some editors would actually feel that they had failed in their responsibility if they gave books by authors they admired to hostile critics or books by authors they disapproved of to critics who might favor them. Editors usually can predict who would review a book enthusiastically and who would tear it to shreds.The main idea of the second paragraph is that

Behind every book review there are two key figures: a book review editor and a reviewer. Editors decide whether a book is reviewed in their publication, when the review appears, how long it is, and who writes the review.When many periodicals feature the same books, this does not prove that the editors of different periodicals have not made individual decisions. Before publication, editors receive news releases and printers proofs of certain books, signifying that the publishers will make special efforts to promote these books. They will be heavily advertised and probably be among the books that most bookstores order in quantity. Not having such books reviewed might give the impression that the editor was caught napping, whereas too many reviews of books that readers will have trouble finding in stores would be inappropriate. Editors can risk having a few of the less popular titles reviewed, but they must consider what will be newsworthy, advertised, and written about elsewhere.If these were the only factors influencing editors, few books that stand little chance of selling well would ever be reviewed. But editors feel some concern about what might endure, and therefore listen to literary experts. A generation ago, a newspaper used a brilliant system of choosing which books to feature. The book review editor sent out a greater number of books than reviews he actually intended to publish. If a review was unenthusiastic, he reasoned that the book was not important enough to be discussed immediately, and if good reviews of enough other books came in, the unenthusiastic review might never be printed. The unenthusiastic reviewers were paid promptly anyway, but they learned that if they wanted their material to be printed, it was advisable to be kind.Most editors print favorable and unfavorable reviews; however, the content of the review may be influenced by the editor. Some editors would actually feel that they had failed in their responsibility if they gave books by authors they admired to hostile critics or books by authors they disapproved of to critics who might favor them. Editors usually can predict who would review a book enthusiastically and who would tear it to shreds.The passage provides information to answer which of the following questions?

Behind every book review there are two key figures: a book review editor and a reviewer. Editors decide whether a book is reviewed in their publication, when the review appears, how long it is, and who writes the review.When many periodicals feature the same books, this does not prove that the editors of different periodicals have not made individual decisions. Before publication, editors receive news releases and printers proofs of certain books, signifying that the publishers will make special efforts to promote these books. They will be heavily advertised and probably be among the books that most bookstores order in quantity. Not having such books reviewed might give the impression that the editor was caught napping, whereas too many reviews of books that readers will have trouble finding in stores would be inappropriate. Editors can risk having a few of the less popular titles reviewed, but they must consider what will be newsworthy, advertised, and written about elsewhere.If these were the only factors influencing editors, few books that stand little chance of selling well would ever be reviewed. But editors feel some concern about what might endure, and therefore listen to literary experts. A generation ago, a newspaper used a brilliant system of choosing which books to feature. The book review editor sent out a greater number of books than reviews he actually intended to publish. If a review was unenthusiastic, he reasoned that the book was not important enough to be discussed immediately, and if good reviews of enough other books came in, the unenthusiastic review might never be printed. The unenthusiastic reviewers were paid promptly anyway, but they learned that if they wanted their material to be printed, it was advisable to be kind.Most editors print favorable and unfavorable reviews; however, the content of the review may be influenced by the editor. Some editors would actually feel that they had failed in their responsibility if they gave books by authors they admired to hostile critics or books by authors they disapproved of to critics who might favor them. Editors usually can predict who would review a book enthusiastically and who would tear it to shreds.According to the passage, book review editors pay attention to all of the following in deciding which books should be reviewed in their publications EXCEPT

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Tom wasnt reading a book. He ______________ the dog.a)was feedingb)fedc)was fedd)is feedingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Tom wasnt reading a book. He ______________ the dog.a)was feedingb)fedc)was fedd)is feedingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Tom wasnt reading a book. He ______________ the dog.a)was feedingb)fedc)was fedd)is feedingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Tom wasnt reading a book. He ______________ the dog.a)was feedingb)fedc)was fedd)is feedingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Tom wasnt reading a book. He ______________ the dog.a)was feedingb)fedc)was fedd)is feedingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Tom wasnt reading a book. He ______________ the dog.a)was feedingb)fedc)was fedd)is feedingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Tom wasnt reading a book. He ______________ the dog.a)was feedingb)fedc)was fedd)is feedingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Tom wasnt reading a book. He ______________ the dog.a)was feedingb)fedc)was fedd)is feedingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Tom wasnt reading a book. He ______________ the dog.a)was feedingb)fedc)was fedd)is feedingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Tom wasnt reading a book. He ______________ the dog.a)was feedingb)fedc)was fedd)is feedingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup