The movie ---- (already start) when we arrived there.Correct answer is 'had already started'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > The movie ---- (already start) when we arrive...

The movie ---- (already start) when we arrived there.

Correct answer is 'had already started'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

The movie ---- (already start) when we arrived there.Correct answer is...

Explanation:

The given sentence is in the past perfect tense, which is used to talk about an action that happened before another past action or time. In this case, the action of the movie starting happened before the action of us arriving at the theater. The correct form of the verb to use in this sentence is "had already started." Here is a detailed explanation:
Past Perfect Tense:
- The past perfect tense is used to express an action that happened before another past action or time.
- It is formed using the auxiliary verb "had" followed by the past participle of the main verb.
Correct Answer: had already started
Detailed
- The sentence is talking about the movie starting before we arrived at the theater.
- We use the past perfect tense to indicate that the movie had started before our arrival.
- The correct form of the verb to use in this sentence is "had already started."
Example:
- The movie had already started when we arrived there.
Key Points:
- The action of the movie starting happened before the action of us arriving at the theater.
- The correct form of the verb to use in this sentence is "had already started."

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

When they arrived we ________ the test.

View answer

If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. But it is not successful. We must, regrettably, conclude that it will neither become a movie nor be revived at the Decade Festival.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argument

View answer

Logical arguments are usually classified as either deductive or inductive, depending on the process used to arrive at them. In the process of deduction, you begin with some statements, called premises, which are assumed to be true, and you then determine what else would have to be true if the premises are true. For example, in mathematics you can begin with some axioms and then determine what you can prove to be true given those axioms are true. With deduction you can provide absolute proof of your conclusions,since your premises are considered correct. The premises themselves, however, remain unproven and unprovable; they must be accepted on face value, or by faith, or for the purpose of exploration.On the other hand, in the process of induction, you begin with some data, and then determine what general conclusion(s) can logically be derived from that data. In other words, you determine what theory or theories could explain the data. For example, you note that the probability of becoming schizophrenic is greatly increased if at least one parent is schizophrenic, and from that you conclude that schizophrenia may be inherited. That is certainly a reasonable hypothesis given the data. Note, however, that induction does not prove that the theory is correct. There are often alternative theories that are also supported by the data. For example, the behavior of the schizophrenic parent may cause the child to be schizophrenic, not the genes. What is important in induction is that the theory does indeed offer a logical explanation of the data. To conclude that the parents have no effect on the schizophrenia of the children is not supportable given the data, and would not be a logical conclusion.Both deduction and induction by themselves are inadequate for a scientific approach. While deduction gives absolute proof, it never makes contact with the real world; there is no place for observation or experimentation - no way to test the validity of the premises. And, while induction is driven by observation, it never approaches actual proof of a theory. Accordingly, a synthesis of these two logical approaches is required for an actual scientific method.Which one of the following statements can be inferred about the induction process of arriving at a logical argument?

View answer

In an effort to promote the culture of movie going, the media industry of Mumbai has decided to not release DVDs in India till about 5 weeks after the movie has been released. The industry director argues that this would force those individuals who are financially well off and wait eagerly for the movie to be released but are too lazy to go to a cinema hall to visit the cinema halls more often.Which of the following if true indicates that the plan to hold off the release of DVDs of a movie is ill designed to have the desired effect?

View answer

The mandates established by the 1838 treaty promoting a greater amount of control for Native American nations over the use of river water flowing through their reservations arrived too late for the Apache tribes living in New Mexico, who had already been displaced from their lands by the time the treaty was finalized.

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2025

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT