Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.While reservation is an effective tool for social mobility, we cannot remain oblivious to the fact that it has strengthened and institutionalised a caste-based identity. Dr. Ambedkar had himself said that reservation cannot be for an unlimited time, but due to vested interests, no authority or organisation has been willing to judge the efficacy of reservation in terms of enabling its intended benefits and examining its percolation to the marginalised sections. The "monopolisation" of reservation has to be looked into. A reserved candidate can avail of concessions such as age relaxation, an increased number of attempts and even financial rebates. But when it comes to competing in an examination, he must be subject to only one cut-off level. By diluting cut-off marks, we are not only inducing complacency but also indirectly making India weak. To imply that people from the reserved category face discrimination is a bit far-fetched. There are many in the unreserved category who continue to face exploitation.Q.In the argument for the abolition of the Indian reservation system, where does the authors assertion that offering concessions to the reserved category in competitive exams leads to mediocrity and weakens India fit?a)It constitutes the arguments conclusion.b)It serves as the arguments premise.c)It doesnt fit into either(1) or (2).d)It simultaneously functions as both the arguments conclusion and premise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.While reservation is an effective tool for social mobility, we cannot remain oblivious to the fact that it has strengthened and institutionalised a caste-based identity. Dr. Ambedkar had himself said that reservation cannot be for an unlimited time, but due to vested interests, no authority or organisation has been willing to judge the efficacy of reservation in terms of enabling its intended benefits and examining its percolation to the marginalised sections. The "monopolisation" of reservation has to be looked into. A reserved candidate can avail of concessions such as age relaxation, an increased number of attempts and even financial rebates. But when it comes to competing in an examination, he must be subject to only one cut-off level. By diluting cut-off marks, we are not only inducing complacency but also indirectly making India weak. To imply that people from the reserved category face discrimination is a bit far-fetched. There are many in the unreserved category who continue to face exploitation.Q.In the argument for the abolition of the Indian reservation system, where does the authors assertion that offering concessions to the reserved category in competitive exams leads to mediocrity and weakens India fit?a)It constitutes the arguments conclusion.b)It serves as the arguments premise.c)It doesnt fit into either(1) or (2).d)It simultaneously functions as both the arguments conclusion and premise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.While reservation is an effective tool for social mobility, we cannot remain oblivious to the fact that it has strengthened and institutionalised a caste-based identity. Dr. Ambedkar had himself said that reservation cannot be for an unlimited time, but due to vested interests, no authority or organisation has been willing to judge the efficacy of reservation in terms of enabling its intended benefits and examining its percolation to the marginalised sections. The "monopolisation" of reservation has to be looked into. A reserved candidate can avail of concessions such as age relaxation, an increased number of attempts and even financial rebates. But when it comes to competing in an examination, he must be subject to only one cut-off level. By diluting cut-off marks, we are not only inducing complacency but also indirectly making India weak. To imply that people from the reserved category face discrimination is a bit far-fetched. There are many in the unreserved category who continue to face exploitation.Q.In the argument for the abolition of the Indian reservation system, where does the authors assertion that offering concessions to the reserved category in competitive exams leads to mediocrity and weakens India fit?a)It constitutes the arguments conclusion.b)It serves as the arguments premise.c)It doesnt fit into either(1) or (2).d)It simultaneously functions as both the arguments conclusion and premise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.While reservation is an effective tool for social mobility, we cannot remain oblivious to the fact that it has strengthened and institutionalised a caste-based identity. Dr. Ambedkar had himself said that reservation cannot be for an unlimited time, but due to vested interests, no authority or organisation has been willing to judge the efficacy of reservation in terms of enabling its intended benefits and examining its percolation to the marginalised sections. The "monopolisation" of reservation has to be looked into. A reserved candidate can avail of concessions such as age relaxation, an increased number of attempts and even financial rebates. But when it comes to competing in an examination, he must be subject to only one cut-off level. By diluting cut-off marks, we are not only inducing complacency but also indirectly making India weak. To imply that people from the reserved category face discrimination is a bit far-fetched. There are many in the unreserved category who continue to face exploitation.Q.In the argument for the abolition of the Indian reservation system, where does the authors assertion that offering concessions to the reserved category in competitive exams leads to mediocrity and weakens India fit?a)It constitutes the arguments conclusion.b)It serves as the arguments premise.c)It doesnt fit into either(1) or (2).d)It simultaneously functions as both the arguments conclusion and premise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.While reservation is an effective tool for social mobility, we cannot remain oblivious to the fact that it has strengthened and institutionalised a caste-based identity. Dr. Ambedkar had himself said that reservation cannot be for an unlimited time, but due to vested interests, no authority or organisation has been willing to judge the efficacy of reservation in terms of enabling its intended benefits and examining its percolation to the marginalised sections. The "monopolisation" of reservation has to be looked into. A reserved candidate can avail of concessions such as age relaxation, an increased number of attempts and even financial rebates. But when it comes to competing in an examination, he must be subject to only one cut-off level. By diluting cut-off marks, we are not only inducing complacency but also indirectly making India weak. To imply that people from the reserved category face discrimination is a bit far-fetched. There are many in the unreserved category who continue to face exploitation.Q.In the argument for the abolition of the Indian reservation system, where does the authors assertion that offering concessions to the reserved category in competitive exams leads to mediocrity and weakens India fit?a)It constitutes the arguments conclusion.b)It serves as the arguments premise.c)It doesnt fit into either(1) or (2).d)It simultaneously functions as both the arguments conclusion and premise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.While reservation is an effective tool for social mobility, we cannot remain oblivious to the fact that it has strengthened and institutionalised a caste-based identity. Dr. Ambedkar had himself said that reservation cannot be for an unlimited time, but due to vested interests, no authority or organisation has been willing to judge the efficacy of reservation in terms of enabling its intended benefits and examining its percolation to the marginalised sections. The "monopolisation" of reservation has to be looked into. A reserved candidate can avail of concessions such as age relaxation, an increased number of attempts and even financial rebates. But when it comes to competing in an examination, he must be subject to only one cut-off level. By diluting cut-off marks, we are not only inducing complacency but also indirectly making India weak. To imply that people from the reserved category face discrimination is a bit far-fetched. There are many in the unreserved category who continue to face exploitation.Q.In the argument for the abolition of the Indian reservation system, where does the authors assertion that offering concessions to the reserved category in competitive exams leads to mediocrity and weakens India fit?a)It constitutes the arguments conclusion.b)It serves as the arguments premise.c)It doesnt fit into either(1) or (2).d)It simultaneously functions as both the arguments conclusion and premise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.While reservation is an effective tool for social mobility, we cannot remain oblivious to the fact that it has strengthened and institutionalised a caste-based identity. Dr. Ambedkar had himself said that reservation cannot be for an unlimited time, but due to vested interests, no authority or organisation has been willing to judge the efficacy of reservation in terms of enabling its intended benefits and examining its percolation to the marginalised sections. The "monopolisation" of reservation has to be looked into. A reserved candidate can avail of concessions such as age relaxation, an increased number of attempts and even financial rebates. But when it comes to competing in an examination, he must be subject to only one cut-off level. By diluting cut-off marks, we are not only inducing complacency but also indirectly making India weak. To imply that people from the reserved category face discrimination is a bit far-fetched. There are many in the unreserved category who continue to face exploitation.Q.In the argument for the abolition of the Indian reservation system, where does the authors assertion that offering concessions to the reserved category in competitive exams leads to mediocrity and weakens India fit?a)It constitutes the arguments conclusion.b)It serves as the arguments premise.c)It doesnt fit into either(1) or (2).d)It simultaneously functions as both the arguments conclusion and premise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.While reservation is an effective tool for social mobility, we cannot remain oblivious to the fact that it has strengthened and institutionalised a caste-based identity. Dr. Ambedkar had himself said that reservation cannot be for an unlimited time, but due to vested interests, no authority or organisation has been willing to judge the efficacy of reservation in terms of enabling its intended benefits and examining its percolation to the marginalised sections. The "monopolisation" of reservation has to be looked into. A reserved candidate can avail of concessions such as age relaxation, an increased number of attempts and even financial rebates. But when it comes to competing in an examination, he must be subject to only one cut-off level. By diluting cut-off marks, we are not only inducing complacency but also indirectly making India weak. To imply that people from the reserved category face discrimination is a bit far-fetched. There are many in the unreserved category who continue to face exploitation.Q.In the argument for the abolition of the Indian reservation system, where does the authors assertion that offering concessions to the reserved category in competitive exams leads to mediocrity and weakens India fit?a)It constitutes the arguments conclusion.b)It serves as the arguments premise.c)It doesnt fit into either(1) or (2).d)It simultaneously functions as both the arguments conclusion and premise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.While reservation is an effective tool for social mobility, we cannot remain oblivious to the fact that it has strengthened and institutionalised a caste-based identity. Dr. Ambedkar had himself said that reservation cannot be for an unlimited time, but due to vested interests, no authority or organisation has been willing to judge the efficacy of reservation in terms of enabling its intended benefits and examining its percolation to the marginalised sections. The "monopolisation" of reservation has to be looked into. A reserved candidate can avail of concessions such as age relaxation, an increased number of attempts and even financial rebates. But when it comes to competing in an examination, he must be subject to only one cut-off level. By diluting cut-off marks, we are not only inducing complacency but also indirectly making India weak. To imply that people from the reserved category face discrimination is a bit far-fetched. There are many in the unreserved category who continue to face exploitation.Q.In the argument for the abolition of the Indian reservation system, where does the authors assertion that offering concessions to the reserved category in competitive exams leads to mediocrity and weakens India fit?a)It constitutes the arguments conclusion.b)It serves as the arguments premise.c)It doesnt fit into either(1) or (2).d)It simultaneously functions as both the arguments conclusion and premise.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.