All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   A person is said to defame another when he i... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
A person is said to defame another when he injures his reputation in the eyes of the right thinking member of the society. The liability of a person who repeats a defamatory matter arises in the same way as the originator, because every repetition is a fresh publication, giving rise to a fresh cause of action. People who disseminate the defamatory matter are equally liable, unless they did not know or in spite of reasonable diligence could not have known that what they were circulating was defamatory.
"Balance between one person's right to freedom of speech and another's right to protect their good name."
Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken , that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person is known as defamation. It is a statement that injures someone's reputation. Defamation is the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone.
Defamation is a wrong done by a person to another's reputation by words, written or spoken, sign or other visible representation. In a motion picture, not only the photographic part of it is considered to be a libel but also the speech which synchronizes with it.
If the victim has to win a lawsuit relating to defamation, then the victim has to prove the following essentials:
(1) Statement- There must be a statement which can be spoken, written, pictured or even gestured.
(2) Publication- For a statement to be published, a third party must have seen, heard or read the defamatory statement. If there is no publication there is no injury of reputation and no action will arise.
(3) Injury- The above statement must have caused an injury to the subject of the statement. It means that the statement must tend to injure the reputation of a person to whom it refers.
(4) Falsity- The defamatory statement must be false. If the statement is not false then the statement will not be considered as defamatory statement.
(5) Unprivileged- In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must be unprivileged. There are certain circumstances, under which a person cannot sue someone for defamation.
Q. Defamation is a communication to some person, other than the person defamed, of the matter which tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right thinking persons. Rahul and Yuganter were brothers.
Rahul was jealous of Yuganter as Yuganter got married despite being younger to Rahul and Rahul did not get any offers. Rahul started spreading rumours about Yuganters character that he had been in relationships with many girls and used them and later parted ways. Yuganters's newly wedded wife Saloni comes to know about this. She files a defamation suit against Rahul. Decide.
  • a)
    Rahul is liable for defamation.
  • b)
    Rahul is not liable for defamation.
  • c)
    Rahul was speaking the truth. Truth is a defence against defamation.
  • d)
    Saloni should leave Yuganter instead of taking side with him.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
A person is said to defame another when he injures his reputation in ...
Correct Answer is (a)
Rahul is liable for defamation as this act of Rahul as lowered the image of Yuganter in the public.
Incorrect Answers
None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
A person is said to defame another when he injures his reputation in ...
Explanation of Defamation Liabilities
In the case presented, Rahul's actions can be evaluated under the principles of defamation. Here’s a breakdown of why Rahul is liable:
1. Statement Made
- Rahul made a statement about Yuganter’s character, alleging he had multiple relationships and used women. This qualifies as a defamatory statement as it harms Yuganter's reputation.
2. Publication of the Statement
- The rumors were spread, implying that a third party (Saloni) heard these statements. The act of sharing rumors constitutes publication, essential for defamation.
3. Injury to Reputation
- The statements made by Rahul tend to lower Yuganter in the eyes of others, particularly affecting his newlywed wife. This can cause emotional distress and damage to his reputation.
4. Falsity of the Statement
- If Rahul's assertions are not true, they meet the requirement of falsity, making the statements defamatory. The burden of proof lies with the defendant to prove the truth of the statements, which Rahul cannot do if they are indeed false.
5. Unprivileged Communication
- The statements made by Rahul do not fall under any privileged communication that would exempt him from liability. Gossip and rumors are generally not protected.
Conclusion
Based on these points, Rahul is liable for defamation. His actions not only harm Yuganter's reputation but also negatively impact Saloni. Therefore, option 'A' is correct: Rahul is liable for defamation. This scenario illustrates the delicate balance between freedom of speech and the protection of individual reputations.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Read the passage carefully and answer the following questions: MY LOVE OF NATURE, goes right back to my childhood, to the times when I stayed on my grandparents' farm in Suffolk. My father was in the armed forces, so we were always moving and didn't have a home base for any length of time, but I loved going there. I think it was my grandmother who encouraged me more than anyone: she taught me the names of wild flowers and got me interested in looking at the countryside, so it seemed obvious to go on to do Zoology at University.I didn't get my first camera until after I'd graduated, when I was due to go diving in Norway and needed a method of recording the sea creatures I would find there. My father didn't know anything about photography, but he bought me an Exacta, which was really quite a good camera for the time, and I went off to take my first pictures of sea anemones and starfish. I became keen very quickly, and learned how to develop and print; obviously I didn't have much money in those days, so I did more black and white photography than colour, but it was all still using the camera very much as a tool to record what I found both by diving and on the shore. I had no ambition at all to be a photographer then, or even for some years afterwards.Unlike many of the wildlife photographers of the time, I trained as a scientist and therefore my way of expressing myself is very different. I've tried from the beginning to produce pictures, which are always biologically correct. There are people who will alter things deliberately: you don't pick up sea creatures from the middle of the shore and take them down to attractive pools at the bottom of the shore without knowing you're doing it. In so doing you're actually falsifying the sort of seaweeds they live on and so on, which may seem unimportant, but it is actually changing the natural surroundings to make them prettier. Unfortunately, many of the people who select pictures are looking for attractive images and, at the end of the day, whether it's truthful or not doesn't really matter to them.It's important to think about the animal first, and there are many occasions when I've not taken a picture because it would have been too disturbing. Nothing is so important that you have to get that shot; of course, there are cases when it would be very sad if you didn't, but it's not the end of the world. There can be a lot of ignorance in people's behaviour towards wild animals and it's a problem that more and more people are going to wild places: while some animals may get used to cars, they won't get used to people suddenly rushing up to them. The sheer pressure of people, coupled with the fact that there are increasingly fewer places where no-one else has photographed, means that over the years, life has become much more difficult for the professional wildlife photographer. Nevertheless, wildlife photographs play a very important part in educating people about what is out there and what needs conserving. Although photography can be an enjoyable pastime, as it is to many people, it is also something that plays a very important part in educating young and old alike. Of the qualities it takes to make a good wildlife photographer, patience is perhaps the most obvious - you just have to be prepared to sit it out. I'm actually more patient now because I write more than ever before, and as long as I've got a bit of paper and a pencil, I don't feel I'm wasting my time. And because I photograph such a wide range of things, even if the main target doesn't appear I can probably find something else to concentrate on instead.How is she different from some of the other wildlife photographers she meets?

Read the passage carefully and answer the following questions:MY LOVE OF NATURE, goes right back to my childhood, to the times when I stayed on my grandparents farm in Suffolk. My father was in the armed forces, so we were always moving and didnt have a home base for any length of time, but I loved going there. I think it was my grandmother who encouraged me more than anyone: she taught me the names of wild flowers and got me interested in looking at the countryside, so it seemed obvious to go on to do Zoology at University.I didnt get my first camera until after Id graduated, when I was due to go diving in Norway and needed a method of recording the sea creatures I would find there. My father didnt know anything about photography, but he bought me an Exacta, which was really quite a good camera for the time, and I went off to take my first pictures of sea anemones and starfish. I became keen very quickly, and learned how to develop and print; obviously I didnt have much money in those days, so I did more black and white photography than colour, but it was all still using the camera very much as a tool to record what I found both by diving and on the shore. I had no ambition at all to be a photographer then, or even for some years afterwards.Unlike many of the wildlife photographers of the time, I trained as a scientist and therefore my way of expressing myself is very different. Ive tried from the beginning to produce pictures, which are always biologically correct. There are people who will alter things deliberately: you dont pick up sea creatures from the middle of the shore and take them down to attractive pools at the bottom of the shore without knowing youre doing it. In so doing youre actually falsifying the sort of seaweeds they live on and so on, which may seem unimportant, but it is actually changing the natural surroundings to make them prettier. Unfortunately, many of the people who select pictures are looking for attractive images and, at the end of the day, whether its truthful or not doesnt really matter to them.Its important to think about the animal first, and there are many occasions when Ive not taken a picture because it would have been too disturbing. Nothing is so important that you have to get that shot; of course, there are cases when it would be very sad if you didnt, but its not the end of the world. There can be a lot of ignorance in peoples behaviour towards wild animals and its a problem that more and more people are going to wild places: while some animals may get used to cars, they wont get used to people suddenly rushing up to them. The sheer pressure of people, coupled with the fact that there are increasingly fewer places where no-one else has photographed, means that over the years, life has become much more difficult for the professional wildlife photographer. Nevertheless, wildlife photographs play a very important part in educating people about what is out there and what needs conserving. Although photography can be an enjoyable pastime, as it is to many people, it is also something that plays a very important part in educating young and old alike. Of the qualities it takes to make a good wildlife photographer, patience is perhaps the most obvious - you just have to be prepared to sit it out. Im actually more patient now because I write more than ever before, and as long as Ive got a bit of paper and a pencil, I dont feel Im wasting my time. And because I photograph such a wide range of things, even if the main target doesnt appear I can probably find something else to concentrate on instead.Q. How is she different from some of the other wildlife photographers she meets?

Read the passage carefully and answer the following questions: MY LOVE OF NATURE, goes right back to my childhood, to the times when I stayed on my grandparents' farm in Suffolk. My father was in the armed forces, so we were always moving and didn't have a home base for any length of time, but I loved going there. I think it was my grandmother who encouraged me more than anyone: she taught me the names of wild flowers and got me interested in looking at the countryside, so it seemed obvious to go on to do Zoology at University.I didn't get my first camera until after I'd graduated, when I was due to go diving in Norway and needed a method of recording the sea creatures I would find there. My father didn't know anything about photography, but he bought me an Exacta, which was really quite a good camera for the time, and I went off to take my first pictures of sea anemones and starfish. I became keen very quickly, and learned how to develop and print; obviously I didn't have much money in those days, so I did more black and white photography than colour, but it was all still using the camera very much as a tool to record what I found both by diving and on the shore. I had no ambition at all to be a photographer then, or even for some years afterwards. Unlike many of the wildlife photographers of the time, I trained as a scientist and therefore my way of expressing myself is very different. I've tried from the beginning to produce pictures, which are always biologically correct. There are people who will alter things deliberately: you don't pick up sea creatures from the middle of the shore and take them down to attractive pools at the bottom of the shore without knowing you're doing it. In so doing you're actually falsifying the sort of seaweeds they live on and so on, which may seem unimportant, but it is actually changing the natural surroundings to make them prettier. Unfortunately, many of the people who select pictures are looking for attractive images and, at the end of the day, whether it's truthful or not doesn't really matter to them.It's important to think about the animal first, and there are many occasions when I've not taken a picture because it would have been too disturbing. Nothing is so important that you have to get that shot; of course, there are cases when it would be very sad if you didn't, but it's not the end of the world. There can be a lot of ignorance in people's behaviour towards wild animals and it's a problem that more and more people are going to wild places: while some animals may get used to cars, they won't get used to people suddenly rushing up to them. The sheer pressure of people, coupled with the fact that there are increasingly fewer places where no-one else has photographed, means that over the years, life has become much more difficult for the professional wildlife photographer. Nevertheless, wildlife photographs play a very important part in educating people about what is out there and what needs conserving. Although photography can be an enjoyable pastime, as it is to many people, it is also something that plays a very important part in educating young and old alike. Of the qualities it takes to make a good wildlife photographer, patience is perhaps the most obvious - you just have to be prepared to sit it out. I'm actually more patient now because I write more than ever before, and as long as I've got a bit of paper and a pencil, I don't feel I'm wasting my time. And because I photograph such a wide range of things, even if the main target doesn't appear I can probably find something else to concentrate on instead.She did more black and white photography than colour because

Read the passage carefully and answer the following questions:MY LOVE OF NATURE, goes right back to my childhood, to the times when I stayed on my grandparents farm in Suffolk. My father was in the armed forces, so we were always moving and didnt have a home base for any length of time, but I loved going there. I think it was my grandmother who encouraged me more than anyone: she taught me the names of wild flowers and got me interested in looking at the countryside, so it seemed obvious to go on to do Zoology at University.I didnt get my first camera until after Id graduated, when I was due to go diving in Norway and needed a method of recording the sea creatures I would find there. My father didnt know anything about photography, but he bought me an Exacta, which was really quite a good camera for the time, and I went off to take my first pictures of sea anemones and starfish. I became keen very quickly, and learned how to develop and print; obviously I didnt have much money in those days, so I did more black and white photography than colour, but it was all still using the camera very much as a tool to record what I found both by diving and on the shore. I had no ambition at all to be a photographer then, or even for some years afterwards.Unlike many of the wildlife photographers of the time, I trained as a scientist and therefore my way of expressing myself is very different. Ive tried from the beginning to produce pictures, which are always biologically correct. There are people who will alter things deliberately: you dont pick up sea creatures from the middle of the shore and take them down to attractive pools at the bottom of the shore without knowing youre doing it. In so doing youre actually falsifying the sort of seaweeds they live on and so on, which may seem unimportant, but it is actually changing the natural surroundings to make them prettier. Unfortunately, many of the people who select pictures are looking for attractive images and, at the end of the day, whether its truthful or not doesnt really matter to them.Its important to think about the animal first, and there are many occasions when Ive not taken a picture because it would have been too disturbing. Nothing is so important that you have to get that shot; of course, there are cases when it would be very sad if you didnt, but its not the end of the world. There can be a lot of ignorance in peoples behaviour towards wild animals and its a problem that more and more people are going to wild places: while some animals may get used to cars, they wont get used to people suddenly rushing up to them. The sheer pressure of people, coupled with the fact that there are increasingly fewer places where no-one else has photographed, means that over the years, life has become much more difficult for the professional wildlife photographer. Nevertheless, wildlife photographs play a very important part in educating people about what is out there and what needs conserving. Although photography can be an enjoyable pastime, as it is to many people, it is also something that plays a very important part in educating young and old alike. Of the qualities it takes to make a good wildlife photographer, patience is perhaps the most obvious - you just have to be prepared to sit it out. Im actually more patient now because I write more than ever before, and as long as Ive got a bit of paper and a pencil, I dont feel Im wasting my time. And because I photograph such a wide range of things, even if the main target doesnt appear I can probably find something else to concentrate on instead.Q. She did more black and white photography than colour because

Images are the core of society today; they have become the means of massive communication and, therefore, the essence of daily life. Humans have become homus photographicus. Almost every person has a camera, whether it is in a cellphone, iPad, tablet, point and shoot or any other device. People have learned to express emotions, ideas and concepts through images regardless of its complexity. Photos may be digital images but not every image is a photograph. In general, the image is defined as a figure, the representation of something. That is, the copy of an object, a mental representation is subject to cognition and interpretation.The material images, under their production scheme, are prone to depict the world on a canvas, the medium determines how people look, read, sing and tell stories.Additionally, the narratives are considered to be truthful because, in order to photograph an object, it has to exist; it has a referent, contrary to painting, where the artist may create chimeras based on imagination. Nonetheless, the veracity of a picture may be questioned since it could be staged or transformed into something else, even something that is not as it appears in reality. For example, a portrait may be an idealistic version of a person, an alter ego or simply not the subject as known in daily life. To illustrate further, the case of Hippolyte Bayard becomes interesting to mention. In 1840, Bayard photographed himself as a drowned man, and people who saw the picture believed it was real. At the time, these images were believed to be real because a mechanic device, a camera, had taken them. In this way, Bayard created an alternative reality, where he was found dead.Q. What is the most important message conveyed by the passage?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

A person is said to defame another when he injures his reputation in the eyes of the right thinking member of the society. The liability of a person who repeats a defamatory matter arises in the same way as the originator, because every repetition is a fresh publication, giving rise to a fresh cause of action. People who disseminate the defamatory matter are equally liable, unless they did not know or in spite of reasonable diligence could not have known that what they were circulating was defamatory."Balance between one person's right to freedom of speech and another's right to protect their good name."Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken , that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person is known as defamation. It is a statement that injures someone's reputation. Defamation is the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone.Defamation is a wrong done by a person to another's reputation by words, written or spoken, sign or other visible representation. In a motion picture, not only the photographic part of it is considered to be a libel but also the speech which synchronizes with it.If the victim has to win a lawsuit relating to defamation, then the victim has to prove the following essentials:(1) Statement- There must be a statement which can be spoken, written, pictured or even gestured.(2) Publication- For a statement to be published, a third party must have seen, heard or read the defamatory statement. If there is no publication there is no injury of reputation and no action will arise.(3) Injury- The above statement must have caused an injury to the subject of the statement. It means that the statement must tend to injure the reputation of a person to whom it refers.(4) Falsity- The defamatory statement must be false. If the statement is not false then the statement will not be considered as defamatory statement.(5) Unprivileged- In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must be unprivileged. There are certain circumstances, under which a person cannot sue someone for defamation.Q. Defamation is a communication to some person, other than the person defamed, of the matter which tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right thinking persons. Rahul and Yuganter were brothers.Rahul was jealous of Yuganter as Yuganter got married despite being younger to Rahul and Rahul did not get any offers. Rahul started spreading rumours about Yuganters character that he had been in relationships with many girls and used them and later parted ways. Yuganters's newly wedded wife Saloni comes to know about this. She files a defamation suit against Rahul. Decide.a)Rahul is liable for defamation.b)Rahul is not liable for defamation.c)Rahul was speaking the truth. Truth is a defence against defamation.d)Saloni should leave Yuganter instead of taking side with him.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
A person is said to defame another when he injures his reputation in the eyes of the right thinking member of the society. The liability of a person who repeats a defamatory matter arises in the same way as the originator, because every repetition is a fresh publication, giving rise to a fresh cause of action. People who disseminate the defamatory matter are equally liable, unless they did not know or in spite of reasonable diligence could not have known that what they were circulating was defamatory."Balance between one person's right to freedom of speech and another's right to protect their good name."Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken , that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person is known as defamation. It is a statement that injures someone's reputation. Defamation is the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone.Defamation is a wrong done by a person to another's reputation by words, written or spoken, sign or other visible representation. In a motion picture, not only the photographic part of it is considered to be a libel but also the speech which synchronizes with it.If the victim has to win a lawsuit relating to defamation, then the victim has to prove the following essentials:(1) Statement- There must be a statement which can be spoken, written, pictured or even gestured.(2) Publication- For a statement to be published, a third party must have seen, heard or read the defamatory statement. If there is no publication there is no injury of reputation and no action will arise.(3) Injury- The above statement must have caused an injury to the subject of the statement. It means that the statement must tend to injure the reputation of a person to whom it refers.(4) Falsity- The defamatory statement must be false. If the statement is not false then the statement will not be considered as defamatory statement.(5) Unprivileged- In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must be unprivileged. There are certain circumstances, under which a person cannot sue someone for defamation.Q. Defamation is a communication to some person, other than the person defamed, of the matter which tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right thinking persons. Rahul and Yuganter were brothers.Rahul was jealous of Yuganter as Yuganter got married despite being younger to Rahul and Rahul did not get any offers. Rahul started spreading rumours about Yuganters character that he had been in relationships with many girls and used them and later parted ways. Yuganters's newly wedded wife Saloni comes to know about this. She files a defamation suit against Rahul. Decide.a)Rahul is liable for defamation.b)Rahul is not liable for defamation.c)Rahul was speaking the truth. Truth is a defence against defamation.d)Saloni should leave Yuganter instead of taking side with him.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about A person is said to defame another when he injures his reputation in the eyes of the right thinking member of the society. The liability of a person who repeats a defamatory matter arises in the same way as the originator, because every repetition is a fresh publication, giving rise to a fresh cause of action. People who disseminate the defamatory matter are equally liable, unless they did not know or in spite of reasonable diligence could not have known that what they were circulating was defamatory."Balance between one person's right to freedom of speech and another's right to protect their good name."Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken , that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person is known as defamation. It is a statement that injures someone's reputation. Defamation is the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone.Defamation is a wrong done by a person to another's reputation by words, written or spoken, sign or other visible representation. In a motion picture, not only the photographic part of it is considered to be a libel but also the speech which synchronizes with it.If the victim has to win a lawsuit relating to defamation, then the victim has to prove the following essentials:(1) Statement- There must be a statement which can be spoken, written, pictured or even gestured.(2) Publication- For a statement to be published, a third party must have seen, heard or read the defamatory statement. If there is no publication there is no injury of reputation and no action will arise.(3) Injury- The above statement must have caused an injury to the subject of the statement. It means that the statement must tend to injure the reputation of a person to whom it refers.(4) Falsity- The defamatory statement must be false. If the statement is not false then the statement will not be considered as defamatory statement.(5) Unprivileged- In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must be unprivileged. There are certain circumstances, under which a person cannot sue someone for defamation.Q. Defamation is a communication to some person, other than the person defamed, of the matter which tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right thinking persons. Rahul and Yuganter were brothers.Rahul was jealous of Yuganter as Yuganter got married despite being younger to Rahul and Rahul did not get any offers. Rahul started spreading rumours about Yuganters character that he had been in relationships with many girls and used them and later parted ways. Yuganters's newly wedded wife Saloni comes to know about this. She files a defamation suit against Rahul. Decide.a)Rahul is liable for defamation.b)Rahul is not liable for defamation.c)Rahul was speaking the truth. Truth is a defence against defamation.d)Saloni should leave Yuganter instead of taking side with him.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A person is said to defame another when he injures his reputation in the eyes of the right thinking member of the society. The liability of a person who repeats a defamatory matter arises in the same way as the originator, because every repetition is a fresh publication, giving rise to a fresh cause of action. People who disseminate the defamatory matter are equally liable, unless they did not know or in spite of reasonable diligence could not have known that what they were circulating was defamatory."Balance between one person's right to freedom of speech and another's right to protect their good name."Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken , that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person is known as defamation. It is a statement that injures someone's reputation. Defamation is the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone.Defamation is a wrong done by a person to another's reputation by words, written or spoken, sign or other visible representation. In a motion picture, not only the photographic part of it is considered to be a libel but also the speech which synchronizes with it.If the victim has to win a lawsuit relating to defamation, then the victim has to prove the following essentials:(1) Statement- There must be a statement which can be spoken, written, pictured or even gestured.(2) Publication- For a statement to be published, a third party must have seen, heard or read the defamatory statement. If there is no publication there is no injury of reputation and no action will arise.(3) Injury- The above statement must have caused an injury to the subject of the statement. It means that the statement must tend to injure the reputation of a person to whom it refers.(4) Falsity- The defamatory statement must be false. If the statement is not false then the statement will not be considered as defamatory statement.(5) Unprivileged- In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must be unprivileged. There are certain circumstances, under which a person cannot sue someone for defamation.Q. Defamation is a communication to some person, other than the person defamed, of the matter which tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right thinking persons. Rahul and Yuganter were brothers.Rahul was jealous of Yuganter as Yuganter got married despite being younger to Rahul and Rahul did not get any offers. Rahul started spreading rumours about Yuganters character that he had been in relationships with many girls and used them and later parted ways. Yuganters's newly wedded wife Saloni comes to know about this. She files a defamation suit against Rahul. Decide.a)Rahul is liable for defamation.b)Rahul is not liable for defamation.c)Rahul was speaking the truth. Truth is a defence against defamation.d)Saloni should leave Yuganter instead of taking side with him.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for A person is said to defame another when he injures his reputation in the eyes of the right thinking member of the society. The liability of a person who repeats a defamatory matter arises in the same way as the originator, because every repetition is a fresh publication, giving rise to a fresh cause of action. People who disseminate the defamatory matter are equally liable, unless they did not know or in spite of reasonable diligence could not have known that what they were circulating was defamatory."Balance between one person's right to freedom of speech and another's right to protect their good name."Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken , that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person is known as defamation. It is a statement that injures someone's reputation. Defamation is the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone.Defamation is a wrong done by a person to another's reputation by words, written or spoken, sign or other visible representation. In a motion picture, not only the photographic part of it is considered to be a libel but also the speech which synchronizes with it.If the victim has to win a lawsuit relating to defamation, then the victim has to prove the following essentials:(1) Statement- There must be a statement which can be spoken, written, pictured or even gestured.(2) Publication- For a statement to be published, a third party must have seen, heard or read the defamatory statement. If there is no publication there is no injury of reputation and no action will arise.(3) Injury- The above statement must have caused an injury to the subject of the statement. It means that the statement must tend to injure the reputation of a person to whom it refers.(4) Falsity- The defamatory statement must be false. If the statement is not false then the statement will not be considered as defamatory statement.(5) Unprivileged- In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must be unprivileged. There are certain circumstances, under which a person cannot sue someone for defamation.Q. Defamation is a communication to some person, other than the person defamed, of the matter which tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right thinking persons. Rahul and Yuganter were brothers.Rahul was jealous of Yuganter as Yuganter got married despite being younger to Rahul and Rahul did not get any offers. Rahul started spreading rumours about Yuganters character that he had been in relationships with many girls and used them and later parted ways. Yuganters's newly wedded wife Saloni comes to know about this. She files a defamation suit against Rahul. Decide.a)Rahul is liable for defamation.b)Rahul is not liable for defamation.c)Rahul was speaking the truth. Truth is a defence against defamation.d)Saloni should leave Yuganter instead of taking side with him.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of A person is said to defame another when he injures his reputation in the eyes of the right thinking member of the society. The liability of a person who repeats a defamatory matter arises in the same way as the originator, because every repetition is a fresh publication, giving rise to a fresh cause of action. People who disseminate the defamatory matter are equally liable, unless they did not know or in spite of reasonable diligence could not have known that what they were circulating was defamatory."Balance between one person's right to freedom of speech and another's right to protect their good name."Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken , that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person is known as defamation. It is a statement that injures someone's reputation. Defamation is the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone.Defamation is a wrong done by a person to another's reputation by words, written or spoken, sign or other visible representation. In a motion picture, not only the photographic part of it is considered to be a libel but also the speech which synchronizes with it.If the victim has to win a lawsuit relating to defamation, then the victim has to prove the following essentials:(1) Statement- There must be a statement which can be spoken, written, pictured or even gestured.(2) Publication- For a statement to be published, a third party must have seen, heard or read the defamatory statement. If there is no publication there is no injury of reputation and no action will arise.(3) Injury- The above statement must have caused an injury to the subject of the statement. It means that the statement must tend to injure the reputation of a person to whom it refers.(4) Falsity- The defamatory statement must be false. If the statement is not false then the statement will not be considered as defamatory statement.(5) Unprivileged- In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must be unprivileged. There are certain circumstances, under which a person cannot sue someone for defamation.Q. Defamation is a communication to some person, other than the person defamed, of the matter which tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right thinking persons. Rahul and Yuganter were brothers.Rahul was jealous of Yuganter as Yuganter got married despite being younger to Rahul and Rahul did not get any offers. Rahul started spreading rumours about Yuganters character that he had been in relationships with many girls and used them and later parted ways. Yuganters's newly wedded wife Saloni comes to know about this. She files a defamation suit against Rahul. Decide.a)Rahul is liable for defamation.b)Rahul is not liable for defamation.c)Rahul was speaking the truth. Truth is a defence against defamation.d)Saloni should leave Yuganter instead of taking side with him.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A person is said to defame another when he injures his reputation in the eyes of the right thinking member of the society. The liability of a person who repeats a defamatory matter arises in the same way as the originator, because every repetition is a fresh publication, giving rise to a fresh cause of action. People who disseminate the defamatory matter are equally liable, unless they did not know or in spite of reasonable diligence could not have known that what they were circulating was defamatory."Balance between one person's right to freedom of speech and another's right to protect their good name."Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken , that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person is known as defamation. It is a statement that injures someone's reputation. Defamation is the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone.Defamation is a wrong done by a person to another's reputation by words, written or spoken, sign or other visible representation. In a motion picture, not only the photographic part of it is considered to be a libel but also the speech which synchronizes with it.If the victim has to win a lawsuit relating to defamation, then the victim has to prove the following essentials:(1) Statement- There must be a statement which can be spoken, written, pictured or even gestured.(2) Publication- For a statement to be published, a third party must have seen, heard or read the defamatory statement. If there is no publication there is no injury of reputation and no action will arise.(3) Injury- The above statement must have caused an injury to the subject of the statement. It means that the statement must tend to injure the reputation of a person to whom it refers.(4) Falsity- The defamatory statement must be false. If the statement is not false then the statement will not be considered as defamatory statement.(5) Unprivileged- In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must be unprivileged. There are certain circumstances, under which a person cannot sue someone for defamation.Q. Defamation is a communication to some person, other than the person defamed, of the matter which tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right thinking persons. Rahul and Yuganter were brothers.Rahul was jealous of Yuganter as Yuganter got married despite being younger to Rahul and Rahul did not get any offers. Rahul started spreading rumours about Yuganters character that he had been in relationships with many girls and used them and later parted ways. Yuganters's newly wedded wife Saloni comes to know about this. She files a defamation suit against Rahul. Decide.a)Rahul is liable for defamation.b)Rahul is not liable for defamation.c)Rahul was speaking the truth. Truth is a defence against defamation.d)Saloni should leave Yuganter instead of taking side with him.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A person is said to defame another when he injures his reputation in the eyes of the right thinking member of the society. The liability of a person who repeats a defamatory matter arises in the same way as the originator, because every repetition is a fresh publication, giving rise to a fresh cause of action. People who disseminate the defamatory matter are equally liable, unless they did not know or in spite of reasonable diligence could not have known that what they were circulating was defamatory."Balance between one person's right to freedom of speech and another's right to protect their good name."Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken , that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person is known as defamation. It is a statement that injures someone's reputation. Defamation is the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone.Defamation is a wrong done by a person to another's reputation by words, written or spoken, sign or other visible representation. In a motion picture, not only the photographic part of it is considered to be a libel but also the speech which synchronizes with it.If the victim has to win a lawsuit relating to defamation, then the victim has to prove the following essentials:(1) Statement- There must be a statement which can be spoken, written, pictured or even gestured.(2) Publication- For a statement to be published, a third party must have seen, heard or read the defamatory statement. If there is no publication there is no injury of reputation and no action will arise.(3) Injury- The above statement must have caused an injury to the subject of the statement. It means that the statement must tend to injure the reputation of a person to whom it refers.(4) Falsity- The defamatory statement must be false. If the statement is not false then the statement will not be considered as defamatory statement.(5) Unprivileged- In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must be unprivileged. There are certain circumstances, under which a person cannot sue someone for defamation.Q. Defamation is a communication to some person, other than the person defamed, of the matter which tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right thinking persons. Rahul and Yuganter were brothers.Rahul was jealous of Yuganter as Yuganter got married despite being younger to Rahul and Rahul did not get any offers. Rahul started spreading rumours about Yuganters character that he had been in relationships with many girls and used them and later parted ways. Yuganters's newly wedded wife Saloni comes to know about this. She files a defamation suit against Rahul. Decide.a)Rahul is liable for defamation.b)Rahul is not liable for defamation.c)Rahul was speaking the truth. Truth is a defence against defamation.d)Saloni should leave Yuganter instead of taking side with him.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A person is said to defame another when he injures his reputation in the eyes of the right thinking member of the society. The liability of a person who repeats a defamatory matter arises in the same way as the originator, because every repetition is a fresh publication, giving rise to a fresh cause of action. People who disseminate the defamatory matter are equally liable, unless they did not know or in spite of reasonable diligence could not have known that what they were circulating was defamatory."Balance between one person's right to freedom of speech and another's right to protect their good name."Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken , that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person is known as defamation. It is a statement that injures someone's reputation. Defamation is the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone.Defamation is a wrong done by a person to another's reputation by words, written or spoken, sign or other visible representation. In a motion picture, not only the photographic part of it is considered to be a libel but also the speech which synchronizes with it.If the victim has to win a lawsuit relating to defamation, then the victim has to prove the following essentials:(1) Statement- There must be a statement which can be spoken, written, pictured or even gestured.(2) Publication- For a statement to be published, a third party must have seen, heard or read the defamatory statement. If there is no publication there is no injury of reputation and no action will arise.(3) Injury- The above statement must have caused an injury to the subject of the statement. It means that the statement must tend to injure the reputation of a person to whom it refers.(4) Falsity- The defamatory statement must be false. If the statement is not false then the statement will not be considered as defamatory statement.(5) Unprivileged- In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must be unprivileged. There are certain circumstances, under which a person cannot sue someone for defamation.Q. Defamation is a communication to some person, other than the person defamed, of the matter which tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right thinking persons. Rahul and Yuganter were brothers.Rahul was jealous of Yuganter as Yuganter got married despite being younger to Rahul and Rahul did not get any offers. Rahul started spreading rumours about Yuganters character that he had been in relationships with many girls and used them and later parted ways. Yuganters's newly wedded wife Saloni comes to know about this. She files a defamation suit against Rahul. Decide.a)Rahul is liable for defamation.b)Rahul is not liable for defamation.c)Rahul was speaking the truth. Truth is a defence against defamation.d)Saloni should leave Yuganter instead of taking side with him.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A person is said to defame another when he injures his reputation in the eyes of the right thinking member of the society. The liability of a person who repeats a defamatory matter arises in the same way as the originator, because every repetition is a fresh publication, giving rise to a fresh cause of action. People who disseminate the defamatory matter are equally liable, unless they did not know or in spite of reasonable diligence could not have known that what they were circulating was defamatory."Balance between one person's right to freedom of speech and another's right to protect their good name."Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken , that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person is known as defamation. It is a statement that injures someone's reputation. Defamation is the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone.Defamation is a wrong done by a person to another's reputation by words, written or spoken, sign or other visible representation. In a motion picture, not only the photographic part of it is considered to be a libel but also the speech which synchronizes with it.If the victim has to win a lawsuit relating to defamation, then the victim has to prove the following essentials:(1) Statement- There must be a statement which can be spoken, written, pictured or even gestured.(2) Publication- For a statement to be published, a third party must have seen, heard or read the defamatory statement. If there is no publication there is no injury of reputation and no action will arise.(3) Injury- The above statement must have caused an injury to the subject of the statement. It means that the statement must tend to injure the reputation of a person to whom it refers.(4) Falsity- The defamatory statement must be false. If the statement is not false then the statement will not be considered as defamatory statement.(5) Unprivileged- In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must be unprivileged. There are certain circumstances, under which a person cannot sue someone for defamation.Q. Defamation is a communication to some person, other than the person defamed, of the matter which tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right thinking persons. Rahul and Yuganter were brothers.Rahul was jealous of Yuganter as Yuganter got married despite being younger to Rahul and Rahul did not get any offers. Rahul started spreading rumours about Yuganters character that he had been in relationships with many girls and used them and later parted ways. Yuganters's newly wedded wife Saloni comes to know about this. She files a defamation suit against Rahul. Decide.a)Rahul is liable for defamation.b)Rahul is not liable for defamation.c)Rahul was speaking the truth. Truth is a defence against defamation.d)Saloni should leave Yuganter instead of taking side with him.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup