State politicians are optimistic that the stateandrsquo;s economic downturn will not be as severe as had been predicted. Their hopes are bolstered by the data released last week:the jobless rate declined two full percentage points in the last six months. But, many economists have pointed out the flight of unemployed residents to the bordering states where jobs are plentiful. Furthermore, many out of work residents have been rehired at minimum wage: virtually all new jobs in the state in the past year have been minimum wage jobs.Economists cast grave doubts on the economic well-being of the state.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in Underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence opposed to the conclusion; the second is an interpretation of the conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation that calls the conclusion into question; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is a conclusion the argument calls into question; the second is the evidence that calls it into question.e)The first is evidence taken to support a conclusion; the second is a position that opposes that conclusion.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > State politicians are optimistic that the sta...

Q. In the argument given, the two portions in Underlined play which of the following roles?

a)
The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
b)
The first is evidence opposed to the conclusion; the second is an interpretation of the conclusion.
c)
The first is an interpretation that calls the conclusion into question; the second is that conclusion.
d)
The first is a conclusion the argument calls into question; the second is the evidence that calls it into question.
e)
The first is evidence taken to support a conclusion; the second is a position that opposes that conclusion.

Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

State politicians are optimistic that the state’s economic downt...

In this argument, view #1 is that of the optimistic politicians, who look to the first piece of evidence #1, the jobless rate decline, for proof. That first piece of evidence is the first bold statement. Then view #2 is that of the economists. They cite more evidence, evidence that calls into question the politician’s optimism in view #1. Finally, we get the economist’s conclusion, view #2, the second underlined statement.

How to express that? The second is definitely the main conclusion of the argument, but the first, evidence #1, is not necessarily something the economists would reject, not something that opposes the economists or calls their view into question. The economists are well aware that the jobless rate has declined: they simply cite additional facts that cast this first fact in a different light. One way to say it is — the first underlined statement, evidence #1, was used to support one conclusion, view #1, and the second underlined statement is a second conclusion, view #2, that calls the first into question.

This is what (E) says. (E) is the credited response.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Recently,some economists have concluded that the major impediment to job growth in the U.S. is the enormous national debt. While many politicians would like to stimulate job growth by increasing government spending, these economists believe it will have the opposite effect and thus want to cut spending immediately.Historically, when total debt levels exceed 90% of domestic GDP, economic growth falls significantly causing job losses and overall economic malaise.The current U.S. debt is over 96% of GDP, so it is hard to argue the importance of decreasing this percentage and the economists are correct on this point. However, what these economists fail to understand is that cutting spending at this critical juncture would put too much pressure on a fragile economy. In the short term, spending should be left at current levels and revenue should be increased by increasing taxes on wealthy individuals and some corporations. As the economy strengthens, then spending can be decreased with the goal of reducing the debt percentage of GDP to a figure below 90%.Q. The portions inunderlineplay which of the following roles?

View answer

Editorial: One of our local television stations has been criticized for its recent coverage of the personal problems of a local politician’s nephew, but the coverage was in fact good journalism. The information was accurate. Furthermore, the newscast had significantly more viewers than it normally does, because many people are curious about the politician’s nephew’s problems.Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify the reasoning in the editorial?

View answer

A politician can neither be reelected nor avoid censure by his or her colleagues if that politician is known to be involved in any serious scandals. Several prominent politicians have just now been shown to be involved in a conspiracy that turned into a serious scandal. These politicians will therefore not be reelected. If the statements above are all true, which one of the following statements must also be true?

View answer

Some people think that in every barrel of politicians there are only a few rotten ones. But if deceit is a quality of rottenness, I believe all effective politicians are rotten. They must be deceitful in order to do the job properly. Someone who is scrupulously honest about obeying the rules of society will never be an effective politician.Assuming that the author’s statements are accurate, which one of the following statements CANNOT be true?

View answer

To discover what percentage of teenagers believe in telekinesis—the psychic ability to move objects without physically touching them—a recent survey asked a representative sample of teenagers whether they agreed with the following statement: “A person’s thoughts can influence the movement of physical objects.” But because this statement is particularly ambiguous and is amenable to a naturalistic, uncontroversial interpretation, the survey’s responses are also ambiguous.The reasoning above conforms most closely to which one of the following general propositions?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2025

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

State politicians are optimistic that the state’s economic downturn will not be as severe as had been predicted. Their hopes are bolstered by the data released last week:the jobless rate declined two full percentage points in the last six months. But, many economists have pointed out the flight of unemployed residents to the bordering states where jobs are plentiful. Furthermore, many out of work residents have been rehired at minimum wage: virtually all new jobs in the state in the past year have been minimum wage jobs.Economists cast grave doubts on the economic well-being of the state.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in Underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence opposed to the conclusion; the second is an interpretation of the conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation that calls the conclusion into question; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is a conclusion the argument calls into question; the second is the evidence that calls it into question.e)The first is evidence taken to support a conclusion; the second is a position that opposes that conclusion.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
State politicians are optimistic that the state’s economic downturn will not be as severe as had been predicted. Their hopes are bolstered by the data released last week:the jobless rate declined two full percentage points in the last six months. But, many economists have pointed out the flight of unemployed residents to the bordering states where jobs are plentiful. Furthermore, many out of work residents have been rehired at minimum wage: virtually all new jobs in the state in the past year have been minimum wage jobs.Economists cast grave doubts on the economic well-being of the state.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in Underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence opposed to the conclusion; the second is an interpretation of the conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation that calls the conclusion into question; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is a conclusion the argument calls into question; the second is the evidence that calls it into question.e)The first is evidence taken to support a conclusion; the second is a position that opposes that conclusion.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about State politicians are optimistic that the state’s economic downturn will not be as severe as had been predicted. Their hopes are bolstered by the data released last week:the jobless rate declined two full percentage points in the last six months. But, many economists have pointed out the flight of unemployed residents to the bordering states where jobs are plentiful. Furthermore, many out of work residents have been rehired at minimum wage: virtually all new jobs in the state in the past year have been minimum wage jobs.Economists cast grave doubts on the economic well-being of the state.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in Underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence opposed to the conclusion; the second is an interpretation of the conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation that calls the conclusion into question; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is a conclusion the argument calls into question; the second is the evidence that calls it into question.e)The first is evidence taken to support a conclusion; the second is a position that opposes that conclusion.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for State politicians are optimistic that the state’s economic downturn will not be as severe as had been predicted. Their hopes are bolstered by the data released last week:the jobless rate declined two full percentage points in the last six months. But, many economists have pointed out the flight of unemployed residents to the bordering states where jobs are plentiful. Furthermore, many out of work residents have been rehired at minimum wage: virtually all new jobs in the state in the past year have been minimum wage jobs.Economists cast grave doubts on the economic well-being of the state.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in Underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence opposed to the conclusion; the second is an interpretation of the conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation that calls the conclusion into question; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is a conclusion the argument calls into question; the second is the evidence that calls it into question.e)The first is evidence taken to support a conclusion; the second is a position that opposes that conclusion.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for State politicians are optimistic that the state’s economic downturn will not be as severe as had been predicted. Their hopes are bolstered by the data released last week:the jobless rate declined two full percentage points in the last six months. But, many economists have pointed out the flight of unemployed residents to the bordering states where jobs are plentiful. Furthermore, many out of work residents have been rehired at minimum wage: virtually all new jobs in the state in the past year have been minimum wage jobs.Economists cast grave doubts on the economic well-being of the state.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in Underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence opposed to the conclusion; the second is an interpretation of the conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation that calls the conclusion into question; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is a conclusion the argument calls into question; the second is the evidence that calls it into question.e)The first is evidence taken to support a conclusion; the second is a position that opposes that conclusion.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of State politicians are optimistic that the state’s economic downturn will not be as severe as had been predicted. Their hopes are bolstered by the data released last week:the jobless rate declined two full percentage points in the last six months. But, many economists have pointed out the flight of unemployed residents to the bordering states where jobs are plentiful. Furthermore, many out of work residents have been rehired at minimum wage: virtually all new jobs in the state in the past year have been minimum wage jobs.Economists cast grave doubts on the economic well-being of the state.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in Underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence opposed to the conclusion; the second is an interpretation of the conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation that calls the conclusion into question; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is a conclusion the argument calls into question; the second is the evidence that calls it into question.e)The first is evidence taken to support a conclusion; the second is a position that opposes that conclusion.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of State politicians are optimistic that the state’s economic downturn will not be as severe as had been predicted. Their hopes are bolstered by the data released last week:the jobless rate declined two full percentage points in the last six months. But, many economists have pointed out the flight of unemployed residents to the bordering states where jobs are plentiful. Furthermore, many out of work residents have been rehired at minimum wage: virtually all new jobs in the state in the past year have been minimum wage jobs.Economists cast grave doubts on the economic well-being of the state.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in Underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence opposed to the conclusion; the second is an interpretation of the conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation that calls the conclusion into question; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is a conclusion the argument calls into question; the second is the evidence that calls it into question.e)The first is evidence taken to support a conclusion; the second is a position that opposes that conclusion.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for State politicians are optimistic that the state’s economic downturn will not be as severe as had been predicted. Their hopes are bolstered by the data released last week:the jobless rate declined two full percentage points in the last six months. But, many economists have pointed out the flight of unemployed residents to the bordering states where jobs are plentiful. Furthermore, many out of work residents have been rehired at minimum wage: virtually all new jobs in the state in the past year have been minimum wage jobs.Economists cast grave doubts on the economic well-being of the state.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in Underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence opposed to the conclusion; the second is an interpretation of the conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation that calls the conclusion into question; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is a conclusion the argument calls into question; the second is the evidence that calls it into question.e)The first is evidence taken to support a conclusion; the second is a position that opposes that conclusion.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of State politicians are optimistic that the state’s economic downturn will not be as severe as had been predicted. Their hopes are bolstered by the data released last week:the jobless rate declined two full percentage points in the last six months. But, many economists have pointed out the flight of unemployed residents to the bordering states where jobs are plentiful. Furthermore, many out of work residents have been rehired at minimum wage: virtually all new jobs in the state in the past year have been minimum wage jobs.Economists cast grave doubts on the economic well-being of the state.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in Underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence opposed to the conclusion; the second is an interpretation of the conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation that calls the conclusion into question; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is a conclusion the argument calls into question; the second is the evidence that calls it into question.e)The first is evidence taken to support a conclusion; the second is a position that opposes that conclusion.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice State politicians are optimistic that the state’s economic downturn will not be as severe as had been predicted. Their hopes are bolstered by the data released last week:the jobless rate declined two full percentage points in the last six months. But, many economists have pointed out the flight of unemployed residents to the bordering states where jobs are plentiful. Furthermore, many out of work residents have been rehired at minimum wage: virtually all new jobs in the state in the past year have been minimum wage jobs.Economists cast grave doubts on the economic well-being of the state.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in Underlined play which of the following roles?a)The first is evidence in support of the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence opposed to the conclusion; the second is an interpretation of the conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation that calls the conclusion into question; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is a conclusion the argument calls into question; the second is the evidence that calls it into question.e)The first is evidence taken to support a conclusion; the second is a position that opposes that conclusion.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam