Which one of the following statements about the land grants made by th...
Background:
The Palas and Pratiharas were two prominent dynasties that ruled over different regions of medieval India. During their reign, they granted land to various individuals, temples, and institutions as a means of maintaining social and economic stability in their territories. These land grants were accompanied by certain terms and conditions that the recipients were expected to adhere to.
Explanation:
The statement that is not true is option C, which states that the villagers could appeal to the king against the peasants of the donated villages. This statement is incorrect because the land grants made by the Palas and Pratiharas were primarily aimed at providing economic benefits to the recipients and ensuring revenue collection for the rulers. The donors did not intend for the villagers to have direct access to the king for resolving disputes or grievances related to the peasants of the donated villages.
Reasons for Incorrectness:
There are several reasons why option C is not true:
1. Lack of Historical Evidence: There is no historical evidence to suggest that the villagers had the right to appeal directly to the king against the peasants of the donated villages. The land grants were primarily concerned with revenue collection and maintaining social order, rather than providing a platform for the villagers to seek justice from the king.
2. Limited Authority of the Villagers: The villagers were not given administrative or judicial powers over the peasants of the donated villages. Their role was mainly restricted to paying dues and carrying out the orders of the donees (recipients of the land grants). They did not have the authority to interfere in the internal affairs of the donated villages or to seek redressal from the king.
3. Centralized Control: The Palas and Pratiharas exercised centralized control over their territories, and the administration was primarily based on a hierarchical system. The king or the ruler was the ultimate authority, and any disputes or grievances were expected to be resolved through the existing administrative channels, rather than through direct appeals from the villagers.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the statement that the villagers could appeal to the king against the peasants of the donated villages is not true. The land grants made by the Palas and Pratiharas were primarily concerned with revenue collection and maintaining social order, and the villagers did not have the right to appeal directly to the king for resolving disputes or grievances related to the peasants of the donated villages.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.