Question Description
Principle – Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort.Facts – Ravi and Lakshman are not the best of friends. They have strained relations and they constantly compete against one another for better business prospects. Ravi sets up a grocery store where he sells food grains for Rs. 20 per kilogram, a rate that is substantially lower than other stores in the same area. The store is a huge success, and Ravi gains huge profits, as everybody prefers to buy the grains from his store. Soon after, Lakshman sets up another store next to Ravi‘s and puts up a board that says, Rice – Rs.15 per kilo and Wheat – Rs. 12 per kilo‘. Attracted by the new offer, all of Ravi‘s customers now prefer to buy grains from Lakshman‘s store. Ravi, hence, incurs heavy losses and is forced to close down his store. He believes that Lakshman has set up the shop in order to make his business fail, and decides to sue Lakshman for damages. Will Ravi succeed?a)No, Ravi cannot sue Lakshman, as Lakshman had an equal right to set up a store and sell commodities at his own prices.b)No, Ravi will not succeed, as no legal right has been violated by Lakshman‘s act of setting up a store and selling food grains for a cheaper price.c)Yes, Ravi will succeed, as he has suffered great losses, and the damage he has suffered must be compensated by Lakshman.d)Ravi can sue, as Lakshman has committed a tort.Correct answer is 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle – Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort.Facts – Ravi and Lakshman are not the best of friends. They have strained relations and they constantly compete against one another for better business prospects. Ravi sets up a grocery store where he sells food grains for Rs. 20 per kilogram, a rate that is substantially lower than other stores in the same area. The store is a huge success, and Ravi gains huge profits, as everybody prefers to buy the grains from his store. Soon after, Lakshman sets up another store next to Ravi‘s and puts up a board that says, Rice – Rs.15 per kilo and Wheat – Rs. 12 per kilo‘. Attracted by the new offer, all of Ravi‘s customers now prefer to buy grains from Lakshman‘s store. Ravi, hence, incurs heavy losses and is forced to close down his store. He believes that Lakshman has set up the shop in order to make his business fail, and decides to sue Lakshman for damages. Will Ravi succeed?a)No, Ravi cannot sue Lakshman, as Lakshman had an equal right to set up a store and sell commodities at his own prices.b)No, Ravi will not succeed, as no legal right has been violated by Lakshman‘s act of setting up a store and selling food grains for a cheaper price.c)Yes, Ravi will succeed, as he has suffered great losses, and the damage he has suffered must be compensated by Lakshman.d)Ravi can sue, as Lakshman has committed a tort.Correct answer is 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle – Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort.Facts – Ravi and Lakshman are not the best of friends. They have strained relations and they constantly compete against one another for better business prospects. Ravi sets up a grocery store where he sells food grains for Rs. 20 per kilogram, a rate that is substantially lower than other stores in the same area. The store is a huge success, and Ravi gains huge profits, as everybody prefers to buy the grains from his store. Soon after, Lakshman sets up another store next to Ravi‘s and puts up a board that says, Rice – Rs.15 per kilo and Wheat – Rs. 12 per kilo‘. Attracted by the new offer, all of Ravi‘s customers now prefer to buy grains from Lakshman‘s store. Ravi, hence, incurs heavy losses and is forced to close down his store. He believes that Lakshman has set up the shop in order to make his business fail, and decides to sue Lakshman for damages. Will Ravi succeed?a)No, Ravi cannot sue Lakshman, as Lakshman had an equal right to set up a store and sell commodities at his own prices.b)No, Ravi will not succeed, as no legal right has been violated by Lakshman‘s act of setting up a store and selling food grains for a cheaper price.c)Yes, Ravi will succeed, as he has suffered great losses, and the damage he has suffered must be compensated by Lakshman.d)Ravi can sue, as Lakshman has committed a tort.Correct answer is 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle – Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort.Facts – Ravi and Lakshman are not the best of friends. They have strained relations and they constantly compete against one another for better business prospects. Ravi sets up a grocery store where he sells food grains for Rs. 20 per kilogram, a rate that is substantially lower than other stores in the same area. The store is a huge success, and Ravi gains huge profits, as everybody prefers to buy the grains from his store. Soon after, Lakshman sets up another store next to Ravi‘s and puts up a board that says, Rice – Rs.15 per kilo and Wheat – Rs. 12 per kilo‘. Attracted by the new offer, all of Ravi‘s customers now prefer to buy grains from Lakshman‘s store. Ravi, hence, incurs heavy losses and is forced to close down his store. He believes that Lakshman has set up the shop in order to make his business fail, and decides to sue Lakshman for damages. Will Ravi succeed?a)No, Ravi cannot sue Lakshman, as Lakshman had an equal right to set up a store and sell commodities at his own prices.b)No, Ravi will not succeed, as no legal right has been violated by Lakshman‘s act of setting up a store and selling food grains for a cheaper price.c)Yes, Ravi will succeed, as he has suffered great losses, and the damage he has suffered must be compensated by Lakshman.d)Ravi can sue, as Lakshman has committed a tort.Correct answer is 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle – Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort.Facts – Ravi and Lakshman are not the best of friends. They have strained relations and they constantly compete against one another for better business prospects. Ravi sets up a grocery store where he sells food grains for Rs. 20 per kilogram, a rate that is substantially lower than other stores in the same area. The store is a huge success, and Ravi gains huge profits, as everybody prefers to buy the grains from his store. Soon after, Lakshman sets up another store next to Ravi‘s and puts up a board that says, Rice – Rs.15 per kilo and Wheat – Rs. 12 per kilo‘. Attracted by the new offer, all of Ravi‘s customers now prefer to buy grains from Lakshman‘s store. Ravi, hence, incurs heavy losses and is forced to close down his store. He believes that Lakshman has set up the shop in order to make his business fail, and decides to sue Lakshman for damages. Will Ravi succeed?a)No, Ravi cannot sue Lakshman, as Lakshman had an equal right to set up a store and sell commodities at his own prices.b)No, Ravi will not succeed, as no legal right has been violated by Lakshman‘s act of setting up a store and selling food grains for a cheaper price.c)Yes, Ravi will succeed, as he has suffered great losses, and the damage he has suffered must be compensated by Lakshman.d)Ravi can sue, as Lakshman has committed a tort.Correct answer is 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle – Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort.Facts – Ravi and Lakshman are not the best of friends. They have strained relations and they constantly compete against one another for better business prospects. Ravi sets up a grocery store where he sells food grains for Rs. 20 per kilogram, a rate that is substantially lower than other stores in the same area. The store is a huge success, and Ravi gains huge profits, as everybody prefers to buy the grains from his store. Soon after, Lakshman sets up another store next to Ravi‘s and puts up a board that says, Rice – Rs.15 per kilo and Wheat – Rs. 12 per kilo‘. Attracted by the new offer, all of Ravi‘s customers now prefer to buy grains from Lakshman‘s store. Ravi, hence, incurs heavy losses and is forced to close down his store. He believes that Lakshman has set up the shop in order to make his business fail, and decides to sue Lakshman for damages. Will Ravi succeed?a)No, Ravi cannot sue Lakshman, as Lakshman had an equal right to set up a store and sell commodities at his own prices.b)No, Ravi will not succeed, as no legal right has been violated by Lakshman‘s act of setting up a store and selling food grains for a cheaper price.c)Yes, Ravi will succeed, as he has suffered great losses, and the damage he has suffered must be compensated by Lakshman.d)Ravi can sue, as Lakshman has committed a tort.Correct answer is 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle – Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort.Facts – Ravi and Lakshman are not the best of friends. They have strained relations and they constantly compete against one another for better business prospects. Ravi sets up a grocery store where he sells food grains for Rs. 20 per kilogram, a rate that is substantially lower than other stores in the same area. The store is a huge success, and Ravi gains huge profits, as everybody prefers to buy the grains from his store. Soon after, Lakshman sets up another store next to Ravi‘s and puts up a board that says, Rice – Rs.15 per kilo and Wheat – Rs. 12 per kilo‘. Attracted by the new offer, all of Ravi‘s customers now prefer to buy grains from Lakshman‘s store. Ravi, hence, incurs heavy losses and is forced to close down his store. He believes that Lakshman has set up the shop in order to make his business fail, and decides to sue Lakshman for damages. Will Ravi succeed?a)No, Ravi cannot sue Lakshman, as Lakshman had an equal right to set up a store and sell commodities at his own prices.b)No, Ravi will not succeed, as no legal right has been violated by Lakshman‘s act of setting up a store and selling food grains for a cheaper price.c)Yes, Ravi will succeed, as he has suffered great losses, and the damage he has suffered must be compensated by Lakshman.d)Ravi can sue, as Lakshman has committed a tort.Correct answer is 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle – Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort.Facts – Ravi and Lakshman are not the best of friends. They have strained relations and they constantly compete against one another for better business prospects. Ravi sets up a grocery store where he sells food grains for Rs. 20 per kilogram, a rate that is substantially lower than other stores in the same area. The store is a huge success, and Ravi gains huge profits, as everybody prefers to buy the grains from his store. Soon after, Lakshman sets up another store next to Ravi‘s and puts up a board that says, Rice – Rs.15 per kilo and Wheat – Rs. 12 per kilo‘. Attracted by the new offer, all of Ravi‘s customers now prefer to buy grains from Lakshman‘s store. Ravi, hence, incurs heavy losses and is forced to close down his store. He believes that Lakshman has set up the shop in order to make his business fail, and decides to sue Lakshman for damages. Will Ravi succeed?a)No, Ravi cannot sue Lakshman, as Lakshman had an equal right to set up a store and sell commodities at his own prices.b)No, Ravi will not succeed, as no legal right has been violated by Lakshman‘s act of setting up a store and selling food grains for a cheaper price.c)Yes, Ravi will succeed, as he has suffered great losses, and the damage he has suffered must be compensated by Lakshman.d)Ravi can sue, as Lakshman has committed a tort.Correct answer is 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle – Violation of a legal right, with or without actual damage, gives rise to a tort.Facts – Ravi and Lakshman are not the best of friends. They have strained relations and they constantly compete against one another for better business prospects. Ravi sets up a grocery store where he sells food grains for Rs. 20 per kilogram, a rate that is substantially lower than other stores in the same area. The store is a huge success, and Ravi gains huge profits, as everybody prefers to buy the grains from his store. Soon after, Lakshman sets up another store next to Ravi‘s and puts up a board that says, Rice – Rs.15 per kilo and Wheat – Rs. 12 per kilo‘. Attracted by the new offer, all of Ravi‘s customers now prefer to buy grains from Lakshman‘s store. Ravi, hence, incurs heavy losses and is forced to close down his store. He believes that Lakshman has set up the shop in order to make his business fail, and decides to sue Lakshman for damages. Will Ravi succeed?a)No, Ravi cannot sue Lakshman, as Lakshman had an equal right to set up a store and sell commodities at his own prices.b)No, Ravi will not succeed, as no legal right has been violated by Lakshman‘s act of setting up a store and selling food grains for a cheaper price.c)Yes, Ravi will succeed, as he has suffered great losses, and the damage he has suffered must be compensated by Lakshman.d)Ravi can sue, as Lakshman has committed a tort.Correct answer is 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.