CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  PRINCIPLE:A master is liable for the acts com... Start Learning for Free
PRINCIPLE: A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in the course of employment.
FACT: Sanjay is a driver working in Brookebond and Co. One day, the Manager asked him to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. On his way back from the airport, he happened to see his fiancé Ruhina waiting for a bus to go home. He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car and soon thereafter; the car somersaulted due to negligence of Sanjay. Ruhina was thrown out of the car and suffered multiple injuries. She seeks compensation from Brookebond and Co.
  • a)
    Brookebond and Co., shall be liable, because Sanjay was in the course of employment at the time of accident
  • b)
    Brookebond and Co., shall not be liable, Sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car.
  • c)
    Ruhina got into the car at her own risk, and therefore, she cannot sue anybody.
  • d)
    None of the above.
Correct answer is 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
PRINCIPLE:A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in ...
  • Vicarious liability can be defined as a legal doctrine that assigns liability for an injury to a person who did not cause the injury who has a particular relationship to the person who did act negligently. It can also be called imputed negligence.
  • This doctrine arises under the common law doctrine of agency, respondeat superior, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability or duty to control" the activities of a violator. 
  • Hence, in the above situation, since the act was not committed in the course of employment, Ruhina will not succeed.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
PRINCIPLE:A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in ...
Ée waiting for him on the road. He stopped the car and spent some time with her, which made him get late to reach the office. In the meantime, the customer missed his flight and suffered a loss.

ISSUE:Whether Brookebond and Co. would be liable for the loss suffered by the customer due to Sanjay's act?

ANALYSIS:As per the given principle, a master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in the course of employment. Here, Sanjay was employed by Brookebond and Co. as a driver, and he was asked by the Manager to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. This act was done in the course of Sanjay's employment, and hence, Brookebond and Co. would be liable for Sanjay's act.

CONCLUSION:Therefore, Brookebond and Co. would be liable for the loss suffered by the customer due to Sanjay's act of spending time with his fiancée on the way back from the airport, which made him get late to reach the office.
Free Test
Community Answer
PRINCIPLE:A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in ...
Correct answer is 'B', as the driver was in the course of employment as he was ordered to come back.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Question Description
PRINCIPLE:A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in the course of employment.FACT:Sanjay is a driver working in Brookebond and Co. One day, the Manager asked him to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. On his way back from the airport, he happened to see his fiancé Ruhina waiting for a bus to go home. He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car and soon thereafter; the car somersaulted due to negligence of Sanjay. Ruhina was thrown out of the car and suffered multiple injuries. She seeks compensation from Brookebond and Co.a)Brookebond and Co., shall be liable, because Sanjay was in the course of employment at the time of accidentb)Brookebond and Co., shall not be liable, Sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car.c)Ruhina got into the car at her own risk, and therefore, she cannot sue anybody.d)None of the above.Correct answer is 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE:A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in the course of employment.FACT:Sanjay is a driver working in Brookebond and Co. One day, the Manager asked him to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. On his way back from the airport, he happened to see his fiancé Ruhina waiting for a bus to go home. He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car and soon thereafter; the car somersaulted due to negligence of Sanjay. Ruhina was thrown out of the car and suffered multiple injuries. She seeks compensation from Brookebond and Co.a)Brookebond and Co., shall be liable, because Sanjay was in the course of employment at the time of accidentb)Brookebond and Co., shall not be liable, Sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car.c)Ruhina got into the car at her own risk, and therefore, she cannot sue anybody.d)None of the above.Correct answer is 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE:A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in the course of employment.FACT:Sanjay is a driver working in Brookebond and Co. One day, the Manager asked him to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. On his way back from the airport, he happened to see his fiancé Ruhina waiting for a bus to go home. He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car and soon thereafter; the car somersaulted due to negligence of Sanjay. Ruhina was thrown out of the car and suffered multiple injuries. She seeks compensation from Brookebond and Co.a)Brookebond and Co., shall be liable, because Sanjay was in the course of employment at the time of accidentb)Brookebond and Co., shall not be liable, Sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car.c)Ruhina got into the car at her own risk, and therefore, she cannot sue anybody.d)None of the above.Correct answer is 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for PRINCIPLE:A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in the course of employment.FACT:Sanjay is a driver working in Brookebond and Co. One day, the Manager asked him to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. On his way back from the airport, he happened to see his fiancé Ruhina waiting for a bus to go home. He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car and soon thereafter; the car somersaulted due to negligence of Sanjay. Ruhina was thrown out of the car and suffered multiple injuries. She seeks compensation from Brookebond and Co.a)Brookebond and Co., shall be liable, because Sanjay was in the course of employment at the time of accidentb)Brookebond and Co., shall not be liable, Sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car.c)Ruhina got into the car at her own risk, and therefore, she cannot sue anybody.d)None of the above.Correct answer is 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of PRINCIPLE:A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in the course of employment.FACT:Sanjay is a driver working in Brookebond and Co. One day, the Manager asked him to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. On his way back from the airport, he happened to see his fiancé Ruhina waiting for a bus to go home. He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car and soon thereafter; the car somersaulted due to negligence of Sanjay. Ruhina was thrown out of the car and suffered multiple injuries. She seeks compensation from Brookebond and Co.a)Brookebond and Co., shall be liable, because Sanjay was in the course of employment at the time of accidentb)Brookebond and Co., shall not be liable, Sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car.c)Ruhina got into the car at her own risk, and therefore, she cannot sue anybody.d)None of the above.Correct answer is 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of PRINCIPLE:A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in the course of employment.FACT:Sanjay is a driver working in Brookebond and Co. One day, the Manager asked him to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. On his way back from the airport, he happened to see his fiancé Ruhina waiting for a bus to go home. He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car and soon thereafter; the car somersaulted due to negligence of Sanjay. Ruhina was thrown out of the car and suffered multiple injuries. She seeks compensation from Brookebond and Co.a)Brookebond and Co., shall be liable, because Sanjay was in the course of employment at the time of accidentb)Brookebond and Co., shall not be liable, Sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car.c)Ruhina got into the car at her own risk, and therefore, she cannot sue anybody.d)None of the above.Correct answer is 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PRINCIPLE:A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in the course of employment.FACT:Sanjay is a driver working in Brookebond and Co. One day, the Manager asked him to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. On his way back from the airport, he happened to see his fiancé Ruhina waiting for a bus to go home. He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car and soon thereafter; the car somersaulted due to negligence of Sanjay. Ruhina was thrown out of the car and suffered multiple injuries. She seeks compensation from Brookebond and Co.a)Brookebond and Co., shall be liable, because Sanjay was in the course of employment at the time of accidentb)Brookebond and Co., shall not be liable, Sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car.c)Ruhina got into the car at her own risk, and therefore, she cannot sue anybody.d)None of the above.Correct answer is 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PRINCIPLE:A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in the course of employment.FACT:Sanjay is a driver working in Brookebond and Co. One day, the Manager asked him to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. On his way back from the airport, he happened to see his fiancé Ruhina waiting for a bus to go home. He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car and soon thereafter; the car somersaulted due to negligence of Sanjay. Ruhina was thrown out of the car and suffered multiple injuries. She seeks compensation from Brookebond and Co.a)Brookebond and Co., shall be liable, because Sanjay was in the course of employment at the time of accidentb)Brookebond and Co., shall not be liable, Sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car.c)Ruhina got into the car at her own risk, and therefore, she cannot sue anybody.d)None of the above.Correct answer is 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice PRINCIPLE:A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in the course of employment.FACT:Sanjay is a driver working in Brookebond and Co. One day, the Manager asked him to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. On his way back from the airport, he happened to see his fiancé Ruhina waiting for a bus to go home. He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car and soon thereafter; the car somersaulted due to negligence of Sanjay. Ruhina was thrown out of the car and suffered multiple injuries. She seeks compensation from Brookebond and Co.a)Brookebond and Co., shall be liable, because Sanjay was in the course of employment at the time of accidentb)Brookebond and Co., shall not be liable, Sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car.c)Ruhina got into the car at her own risk, and therefore, she cannot sue anybody.d)None of the above.Correct answer is 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev