UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constit... Start Learning for Free
Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court of India has played a vital role in interpreting and upholding its provisions. In this context consider the following pairs:
1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - Doctrine of basic structure
2. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - Principle of free and fair elections
3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) - Limitations on Parliament’s power
How many of the above pairs is/are correct?
  • a)
    Only one
  • b)
    Only two
  • c)
    All three
  • d)
    None
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court ...
All statements are correct.
Judgments related to amendment of the Constitution
  • Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court of India has played a vital role in interpreting and upholding its provisions.
  • Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973): This landmark judgment established the doctrine of basic structure, which holds that there are certain essential features of the Constitution that cannot be amended by Parliament. It ensures the protection of fundamental rights and the basic framework of the Constitution.
  • Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975): In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that even the Prime Minister is subject to the rule of law, and it upheld the principle of free and fair elections.
  • Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980): This judgment further clarifi ed the limitations on Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution. It held that Parliament cannot destroy or damage the basic features of the Constitution.
Free Test
Community Answer
Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court ...
Explanation:

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - Doctrine of basic structure:
- In this landmark case, the Supreme Court of India upheld the doctrine of basic structure, which implies that there are certain essential features of the Constitution that cannot be altered by amendment.
- The court ruled that while Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its basic structure.

Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - Principle of free and fair elections:
- This case is famous for setting a precedent for free and fair elections in India.
- The Supreme Court declared the election of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi as void on grounds of electoral malpractices, emphasizing the importance of upholding the principle of free and fair elections in a democracy.

Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) - Limitations on Parliament's power:
- In this case, the Supreme Court struck down parts of the 42nd Amendment Act, which had given Parliament the power to alter any part of the Constitution.
- The court held that while Parliament has the authority to amend the Constitution, it cannot destroy its basic structure or take away fundamental rights.
Therefore, all three pairs mentioned in the question are correct as each case represents a significant judgment by the Supreme Court of India in interpreting and upholding the provisions of the Indian Constitution.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court of India has played a vital role in interpreting and upholding its provisions. In this context consider the following pairs:1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - Doctrine of basic structure2. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - Principle of free and fair elections3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) - Limitations on Parliament’s powerHow many of the above pairs is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court of India has played a vital role in interpreting and upholding its provisions. In this context consider the following pairs:1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - Doctrine of basic structure2. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - Principle of free and fair elections3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) - Limitations on Parliament’s powerHow many of the above pairs is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court of India has played a vital role in interpreting and upholding its provisions. In this context consider the following pairs:1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - Doctrine of basic structure2. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - Principle of free and fair elections3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) - Limitations on Parliament’s powerHow many of the above pairs is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court of India has played a vital role in interpreting and upholding its provisions. In this context consider the following pairs:1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - Doctrine of basic structure2. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - Principle of free and fair elections3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) - Limitations on Parliament’s powerHow many of the above pairs is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court of India has played a vital role in interpreting and upholding its provisions. In this context consider the following pairs:1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - Doctrine of basic structure2. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - Principle of free and fair elections3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) - Limitations on Parliament’s powerHow many of the above pairs is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court of India has played a vital role in interpreting and upholding its provisions. In this context consider the following pairs:1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - Doctrine of basic structure2. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - Principle of free and fair elections3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) - Limitations on Parliament’s powerHow many of the above pairs is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court of India has played a vital role in interpreting and upholding its provisions. In this context consider the following pairs:1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - Doctrine of basic structure2. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - Principle of free and fair elections3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) - Limitations on Parliament’s powerHow many of the above pairs is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court of India has played a vital role in interpreting and upholding its provisions. In this context consider the following pairs:1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - Doctrine of basic structure2. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - Principle of free and fair elections3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) - Limitations on Parliament’s powerHow many of the above pairs is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court of India has played a vital role in interpreting and upholding its provisions. In this context consider the following pairs:1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - Doctrine of basic structure2. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - Principle of free and fair elections3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) - Limitations on Parliament’s powerHow many of the above pairs is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Regarding key judgments on the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court of India has played a vital role in interpreting and upholding its provisions. In this context consider the following pairs:1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - Doctrine of basic structure2. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - Principle of free and fair elections3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) - Limitations on Parliament’s powerHow many of the above pairs is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev