Key Differences in the Quit India Movement of 1942:

Leadership:
- The Quit India Movement was characterized by the absence of a central leadership figure, unlike previous movements led by prominent leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru.
- The movement was more decentralized, with local leaders and activists taking charge of organizing protests and demonstrations.

Scope of Participation:
- The Quit India Movement saw a broader participation of people from different sections of society, including students, peasants, and industrial workers.
- The movement also witnessed a significant involvement of women in the freedom struggle, breaking traditional gender roles.

Violent Responses:
- The Quit India Movement saw a more militant response from the British government, with widespread arrests, violence, and repression.
- The movement faced harsh crackdowns, leading to the imprisonment of many leaders and activists.

Focus on Complete Independence:
- Unlike previous movements that aimed at specific demands or reforms, the Quit India Movement called for complete independence from British rule.
- The movement symbolized a more radical and uncompromising approach towards achieving freedom.

Impact on National Consciousness:
- The Quit India Movement played a significant role in shaping the national consciousness and unity, as people from diverse backgrounds came together for a common cause.
- The movement inspired a sense of pride and solidarity among Indians, laying the foundation for future struggles for independence.