Question Description
Consider the following statements:Statement-I: The Supreme Court, in the Berubari Union case (1960), opined that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution.Statement-II: In the Kesavananda Bharati case 17 (1973), the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectc)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Id)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for DSSSB TGT/PGT/PRT 2024 is part of DSSSB TGT/PGT/PRT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the DSSSB TGT/PGT/PRT exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements:Statement-I: The Supreme Court, in the Berubari Union case (1960), opined that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution.Statement-II: In the Kesavananda Bharati case 17 (1973), the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectc)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Id)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for DSSSB TGT/PGT/PRT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements:Statement-I: The Supreme Court, in the Berubari Union case (1960), opined that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution.Statement-II: In the Kesavananda Bharati case 17 (1973), the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectc)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Id)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Consider the following statements:Statement-I: The Supreme Court, in the Berubari Union case (1960), opined that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution.Statement-II: In the Kesavananda Bharati case 17 (1973), the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectc)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Id)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for DSSSB TGT/PGT/PRT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for DSSSB TGT/PGT/PRT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following statements:Statement-I: The Supreme Court, in the Berubari Union case (1960), opined that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution.Statement-II: In the Kesavananda Bharati case 17 (1973), the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectc)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Id)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Consider the following statements:Statement-I: The Supreme Court, in the Berubari Union case (1960), opined that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution.Statement-II: In the Kesavananda Bharati case 17 (1973), the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectc)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Id)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following statements:Statement-I: The Supreme Court, in the Berubari Union case (1960), opined that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution.Statement-II: In the Kesavananda Bharati case 17 (1973), the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectc)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Id)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following statements:Statement-I: The Supreme Court, in the Berubari Union case (1960), opined that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution.Statement-II: In the Kesavananda Bharati case 17 (1973), the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectc)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Id)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Consider the following statements:Statement-I: The Supreme Court, in the Berubari Union case (1960), opined that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution.Statement-II: In the Kesavananda Bharati case 17 (1973), the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectc)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Id)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice DSSSB TGT/PGT/PRT tests.