Why the narrator thinks love and affection were a trespass upon it?
The narrator believes love and affection were a trespass upon it, likely due to the fact that the entity or object being referred to may have been designed for a specific purpose or function that did not involve emotions or personal connections. The idea of love and affection may have been seen as unnecessary or irrelevant to the purpose of the object.

Do you agree?
I may or may not agree with the narrator's perspective, as it depends on the context and nature of the entity in question. In some cases, objects or entities may indeed be designed for specific tasks or functions where love and affection are not applicable. However, in other situations, the presence of love and affection can enhance the experience or relationship with the object or entity, making it more meaningful and fulfilling.

Explanation
- It is important to consider the nature and purpose of the entity or object in order to determine whether love and affection are appropriate or necessary.
- Some individuals may prioritize practicality and functionality over emotional connections, leading them to view love and affection as unnecessary trespasses.
- On the other hand, others may value emotional bonds and connections with objects, believing that love and affection can enrich the overall experience and relationship.
In conclusion, whether love and affection are considered trespasses upon an entity or object depends on individual perspectives and the context in which the entity exists. While some may see emotions as irrelevant, others may find value in incorporating love and affection into their interactions.