UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >   Consider the following pairs:1. Olga Tellis ... Start Learning for Free
Consider the following pairs:
1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) - Right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21.
2. Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1996) - Right to shelter includes adequate living space and sanitation.
3. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan (1997) - Directed state to provide free healthcare services.
4. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 - Provides the right to shelter for forest dwellers.
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
  • a)
    Only one pair
  • b)
    Only two pairs
  • c)
    Only three pairs
  • d)
    All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Consider the following pairs:1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corpo...
1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) is correctly matched. This case recognized the right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21.
2. Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1996) is correctly matched. This case declared that the right to shelter is a fundamental right under Article 21, including adequate living space and sanitation.
3. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan (1997) is incorrectly matched. This case did not direct the state to provide free healthcare services but reiterated the state's duty to provide shelter to make the right to life meaningful.
4. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 is incorrectly matched. This Act does not specifically provide the right to shelter but recognizes forest rights, including habitation rights for forest dwellers.
Thus, pairs 1 and 2 are correctly matched.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Consider the following pairs:1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) - Right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21.2. Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1996) - Right to shelter includes adequate living space and sanitation.3. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan (1997) - Directed state to provide free healthcare services.4. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 - Provides the right to shelter for forest dwellers.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Consider the following pairs:1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) - Right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21.2. Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1996) - Right to shelter includes adequate living space and sanitation.3. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan (1997) - Directed state to provide free healthcare services.4. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 - Provides the right to shelter for forest dwellers.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following pairs:1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) - Right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21.2. Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1996) - Right to shelter includes adequate living space and sanitation.3. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan (1997) - Directed state to provide free healthcare services.4. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 - Provides the right to shelter for forest dwellers.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following pairs:1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) - Right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21.2. Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1996) - Right to shelter includes adequate living space and sanitation.3. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan (1997) - Directed state to provide free healthcare services.4. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 - Provides the right to shelter for forest dwellers.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Consider the following pairs:1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) - Right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21.2. Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1996) - Right to shelter includes adequate living space and sanitation.3. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan (1997) - Directed state to provide free healthcare services.4. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 - Provides the right to shelter for forest dwellers.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following pairs:1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) - Right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21.2. Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1996) - Right to shelter includes adequate living space and sanitation.3. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan (1997) - Directed state to provide free healthcare services.4. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 - Provides the right to shelter for forest dwellers.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Consider the following pairs:1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) - Right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21.2. Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1996) - Right to shelter includes adequate living space and sanitation.3. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan (1997) - Directed state to provide free healthcare services.4. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 - Provides the right to shelter for forest dwellers.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following pairs:1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) - Right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21.2. Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1996) - Right to shelter includes adequate living space and sanitation.3. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan (1997) - Directed state to provide free healthcare services.4. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 - Provides the right to shelter for forest dwellers.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following pairs:1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) - Right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21.2. Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1996) - Right to shelter includes adequate living space and sanitation.3. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan (1997) - Directed state to provide free healthcare services.4. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 - Provides the right to shelter for forest dwellers.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Consider the following pairs:1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) - Right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21.2. Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1996) - Right to shelter includes adequate living space and sanitation.3. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan (1997) - Directed state to provide free healthcare services.4. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 - Provides the right to shelter for forest dwellers.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev