UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > Consider the following statements:Statement-...
Start Learning for Free
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.
Statement-II:
The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.
Statement-II:
The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- b)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- c)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- d)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highl...
Statement-I is correct as it reflects the recent news involving the Supreme Court's stance on relaxing stringent bail conditions due to trial delays in money laundering cases.
Statement-II is also correct as it highlights the US District Court's accusation against Google for maintaining a monopoly through exclusive deals, unrelated to the Supreme Court's bail relaxation context. Therefore, both statements are individually correct but are not interlinked in terms of explanation, making option (b) the correct choice.
Most Upvoted Answer
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highl...
Explanation:
Statement-I:
- The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.
- This statement is correct as the Supreme Court indeed emphasized the need to take into account factors such as delay in trial and lengthy pre-trial detention when deciding on bail conditions in money laundering cases.
Statement-II:
- The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.
- This statement is also correct as the US District Court of Columbia did accuse Google of leveraging its dominant market position through exclusive deals with smartphone manufacturers, which raised antitrust concerns.
Therefore, both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct. However, Statement-II does not directly explain or relate to Statement-I. They are separate events or cases that happened independently, highlighting different issues in the legal and business domains.
Statement-I:
- The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.
- This statement is correct as the Supreme Court indeed emphasized the need to take into account factors such as delay in trial and lengthy pre-trial detention when deciding on bail conditions in money laundering cases.
Statement-II:
- The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.
- This statement is also correct as the US District Court of Columbia did accuse Google of leveraging its dominant market position through exclusive deals with smartphone manufacturers, which raised antitrust concerns.
Therefore, both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct. However, Statement-II does not directly explain or relate to Statement-I. They are separate events or cases that happened independently, highlighting different issues in the legal and business domains.
Attention UPSC Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Similar UPSC Doubts
Top Courses for UPSCView all
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.Statement-II:The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.Statement-II:The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.Statement-II:The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.Statement-II:The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.Statement-II:The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.Statement-II:The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.Statement-II:The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.Statement-II:The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.Statement-II:The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.Statement-II:The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.Statement-II:The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.Statement-II:The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of considering the delay in trial and extensive pre-trial detention as reasons to relax stringent bail conditions in cases related to money laundering.Statement-II:The US District Court of Columbia accused search giant - Google - of using its dominant position in the online search market by cutting exclusive deals with smartphone makers such as Apple and Samsung.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup