Question Description
Consultant: Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right. Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely that complex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Consultant: Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right. Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely that complex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consultant: Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right. Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely that complex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Consultant: Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right. Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely that complex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Consultant: Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right. Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely that complex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Consultant: Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right. Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely that complex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consultant: Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right. Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely that complex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consultant: Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right. Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely that complex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Consultant: Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right. Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely that complex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.