GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo...
Start Learning for Free
Consultant: Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right. Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics' lack of competence. Rather, it is likely that complex repairs require a level of focused attention that the company's mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.
In the consultant's reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
In the consultant's reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
- a)The first is the consultant's main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.
- b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultant's own explanation of that finding.
- c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.
- d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultant's explanation of that contrast.
- e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultant's explanation of that contrast.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of ...
Consultant: Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right. Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics' lack of competence. Rather, it is likely that complex repairs require a level of focused attention that the company's mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.
In the consultant's reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
Passage Map: Chronologically, it looks like -
Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, - A reasoning to make a claim. It is established that mechanics who do initial repairs and mechanics who redo unsatisfactory jobs are equally capable to do their job.
Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, - A reasoning to make a claim. It is established that mechanics who do initial repairs and mechanics who redo unsatisfactory jobs are equally capable to do their job.
we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics' lack of competence. - This is the claim, based on previous reasoning, that mechanics' lack of competence is not the reason behind mistakes in initial repairs. This is the main conclusion.
Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right. - BF1: Since we have a few assumptions previously established, this is paradoxical finding that is author tries to resolve in the passage ahead.
Rather, it is likely that complex repairs require a level of focused attention that the company's mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try. - The keyword 'rather' suggests that author takes a turn to explain the issue at hand. 'it is likely' suggests that whatever comes next is the possible reasoning given by author. Here author clears the ambiguity as presented in BF1 by giving a alternative explanation as why was that so.
(A) The first is the consultant's main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion. - WRONG. An easy elimination since both parts are incorrect. Neither BF1 is main conclusion, nor BF2 is 'evidence'.
(B) The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultant's own explanation of that finding. - WRONG. First part is wrong since BF1 is neither an 'evidence' nor it serves as the 'basis' to reject anything. Second part is correct - BF2 is consultant's explanation.
(C) The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true. - WRONG. First part is wrong to say that BF1 is a 'claim', neither it's the issue of its truthfulness - finding its truthfulness may result in either way, it may be true or may not be. Second part is wrong to say that BF2 acts as an 'evidence' and also wrong in saying what BF2 does.
(D) The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultant's explanation of that contrast. - CORRECT. First part is correct. If we follow the chronology of passage we find that BF1 present an opposite(to assumption) finding which is an issue at hand. Second part is also correct for BF2 is consultant's explanation.
(E) The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultant's explanation of that contrast. - WRONG. First part is correct about BF1. Second part is wrong for neither BF2 is an 'evidence' nor it challenges anything at all in the passage.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right.Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely thatcomplex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions inboldfaceplay which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right.Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely thatcomplex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions inboldfaceplay which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right.Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely thatcomplex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions inboldfaceplay which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right.Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely thatcomplex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions inboldfaceplay which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right.Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely thatcomplex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions inboldfaceplay which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right.Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely thatcomplex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions inboldfaceplay which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right.Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely thatcomplex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions inboldfaceplay which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right.Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely thatcomplex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions inboldfaceplay which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right.Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely thatcomplex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions inboldfaceplay which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right.Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely thatcomplex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions inboldfaceplay which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right.Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely thatcomplex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions inboldfaceplay which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right.Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely thatcomplex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions inboldfaceplay which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Consultant:Ace Repairs ends up having to redo a significant number of the complex repair jobs it undertakes, but when those repairs are redone, they are invariably done right.Since we have established that there is no systematic difference between the mechanics who are assigned to do the initial repairs and those who are assigned to redo unsatisfactory jobs, we must reject the hypothesis that mistakes made in the initial repairs are due to the mechanics lack of competence. Rather, it is likely thatcomplex repairs require a level of focused attention that the companys mechanics apply consistently only to repair jobs that have not been done right on the first try.In the consultants reasoning, the two portions inboldfaceplay which of the following roles?a)The first is the consultants main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.b)The first is evidence that serves as the basis for rejecting one explanation of a certain finding; the second is the consultants own explanation of that finding.c)The first is a claim whose truth is at issue in the reasoning; the second provides evidence to show that the claim is true.d)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is the consultants explanation of that contrast.e)The first presents a contrast whose explanation is at issue in the reasoning; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the consultants explanation of that contrast.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup