All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for o... Start Learning for Free
If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.
  • a)
    If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.
  • b)
    If she were to go to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.
  • c)
    If she becomes the winner of the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.
  • d)
    In the event that she would win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.
  • e)
    If she goes to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.a)I...
Answer:

Explanation:

The correct answer is option 'A' - "If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised." This sentence is constructed using the unreal conditional form, also known as the subjunctive mood. Let's break down each option and analyze why 'A' is the correct choice.

a) If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.

- This sentence correctly uses the subjunctive mood by using the phrase "were to" instead of "was to." The subjunctive mood is used to express a hypothetical or unreal situation, and in this case, it implies that winning the Olympic medal is unlikely.
- The phrase "I for one would be surprised" expresses the speaker's surprise at the hypothetical event and is grammatically correct.

b) If she were to go to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.

- This sentence is grammatically incorrect. The phrase "go to win" is not commonly used in this context. It would be more appropriate to use the verb "win" without "go to."
- Additionally, the subjunctive mood should be used with "were" instead of "was" to convey an unreal or hypothetical situation.

c) If she becomes the winner of the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.

- This sentence does not use the correct verb form to convey a hypothetical or unreal situation. Instead of using "becomes," it should use "were to become" to maintain consistency with the subjunctive mood.

d) In the event that she would win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.

- This sentence is grammatically correct, but it does not use the subjunctive mood. Instead, it uses the conditional form "would win" to express a hypothetical situation.
- While this sentence effectively conveys the idea of surprise, it does not adhere to the prompt's requirement of using the subjunctive mood.

e) If she goes to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.

- This sentence is grammatically correct, but it does not use the subjunctive mood. Instead, it uses the present tense "goes to win" to express a hypothetical situation.
- Again, while this sentence effectively conveys the idea of surprise, it does not adhere to the prompt's requirement of using the subjunctive mood.

In conclusion, option 'A' is the correct answer because it uses the subjunctive mood correctly and maintains grammatical accuracy.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.a)I...
The answer is A because  
Option B = 'were to go to win' is wrong, no need to write go to win 
Option C = 'Becomes the winner of the medal' is wrong, we just write win a medal.
Option D = 'in the event'  should not be followed by would 
Option E = you can't write "goes to win the medal'
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

One of the kinds of human enhancement that has received extensive philosophical attention in recent years is the use of biomedical interventions to improve the physical performance of athletes in the context of sports. One reason athletic performance enhancement garners so much attention is because of its currency, given the epidemic of ""doping"" scandals in contemporary sport.At first impression, the ethical problem with performance enhancement in sport would seem to be simply a problem of cheating. If the rules of sport forbid the use of performance enhancements, then their illicit use confers an advantage to users against other athletes. That advantage, in turn, can create pressure for more athletes to cheat in the same way, undermining the basis for the competitions at stake and exacerbating the gap between those who can afford enhancements and those who cannot.The rules of a game can be changed. In sports, novel forms of performance enhancing equipment and training are routinely introduced as athletic technology and expertise evolve. Where issues of athletes' equitable access arise, they can be dealt with in one of two ways. Sometimes it is possible to ensure fair distribution, as for example, when the International Olympic Committee negotiated an agreement with the manufacturer of the new ""FastSkin"" swimming suit to provide suits to all the teams at the Sydney Olympics. In other cases, inequalities may simply come to be accepted as unfortunate but not unfair. This is, for example, how many people would view a story about an equatorial country that could not afford year-round artificial snow for its ski team, and so could not compete evenly with the ski teams of northern countries. If enhancement interventions can either be distributed fairly or the inequities they create can be written into the rules of the social game in question as part of the given advantages of the more fortunate, then individual users no longer face a fairness problem. For those who can afford it, for example, what would be ethically suspect about mounting a mirror image of the ""Special Olympics"" for athletes with disabilities: a ""Super Olympics"", featuring athletes universally equipped with the latest modifications and enhancements? For answers to that challenge, the critics of biomedical enhancement have to dig beyond concerns about the fair governance of games to a deeper and broader sense of ""cheating"", in terms of the corrosive effects of enhancement on the integrity of admirable human practices.Q. Complete the following- "Super Olympics", as per the passage

One of the kinds of human enhancement that has received extensive philosophical attention in recent years is the use of biomedical interventions to improve the physical performance of athletes in the context of sports.One reason athletic performance enhancement garners so much attention is because of its currency, given the epidemic of "doping" scandals in contemporary sport.At first impression, the ethical problem with performance enhancement in sport would seem to be simply a problem of cheating. If the rules of sport forbid the use of performance enhancements, then their illicit use confers an advantage to users against other athletes. That advantage, in turn, can create pressure for more athletes to cheat in the same way, undermining the basis for the competitions at stake and exacerbating the gap between those who can afford enhancements and those who cannot.The rules of a game can be changed. In sports, novel forms of performance enhancing equipment and training are routinely introduced as athletic technology and expertise evolve. Where issues of athletes equitable access arise, they can be dealt with in one of two ways.Sometimes it is possible to ensure fair distribution, as for example, when the International Olympic Committee negotiated an agreement with the manufacturer of the new "FastSkin" swimming suit to provide suits to all the teams at the Sydney Olympics. In other cases, inequalities may simply come to be accepted as unfortunate but not unfair. This is, for example, how many people would view a story about an equatorial country that could not afford year-round artificial snow for its ski team, and so could not compete evenly with the ski teams of northern countries. If enhancement interventions can either be distributed fairly or the inequities they create can be written into the rules of the social game in question as part of the given advantages of the more fortunate, then individual users no longer face a fairness problem.For those who can afford it, for example, what would be ethically suspect about mounting a mirror image of the "Special Olympics" for athletes with disabilities: a "Super Olympics", featuring athletes universally equipped with the latest modifications and enhancements? For answers to that challenge, the critics of biomedical enhancement have to dig beyond concerns about the fair governance of games to a deeper and broader sense of "cheating", in terms of the corrosive effects of enhancement on the integrity of admirable human practices.Q. "Super Olympics", as per the passage

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Soapy's hopes for the winter were not very high. He was not thinking of sailing away on a ship. He was not thinking of southern skies, or of the Bay of Naples. Three months in the prison on Blackwell's Island was what he wanted. Three months of food every day and a bed every night, three months safe from the cold north wind and safe from cops. This seemed to Soapy the most desirable thing in the world. For years Blackwell's Island had been his winter home. Richer New Yorkers made their large plans to go to Florida or to the shore of the Mediterranean Sea each winter. Soapy made his small plans for going to the Island. And now the time had come. Three big newspapers, some under his coat and some over his legs, had not kept him warm during the night in the park. So Soapy was thinking of the Island. There were places in the city where he could go and ask for food and a bed.These would be given to him. He could move from one building to another, and he would be taken care of through the winter. But he liked Blackwell's Island better. Soapy's spirit was proud. If he went to any of these places, there were certain things he had to do. In one way or another, he would have to pay for what they gave him. They would not ask him for money. But they would make him wash his whole body. They would make him answer questions; they would want to know everything about his life. No. Prison was better than that. The prison had rules that he would have to follow. But in prison a gentleman's own life was still his own life. Soapy, having decided to go to the Island, at once began to move towards his desire.Q. Which of the following statements is TRUE in the context of the passage?

Direction:Read the given passages and answer the questions that follow.One of the kinds of human enhancement that has received extensive philosophical attention in recent years is the use of biomedical interventions to improve the physical performance of athletes in the context of sports. One reason athletic performance enhancement garners so much attention is because of its currency, given the epidemic of "doping" scandals in contemporary sport. At first impression, theethical problem with performance enhancement in sport would seem to be simply a problem of cheating. If the rules of sport forbid the use of performance enhancements, then their illicit use confers an advantage to users against other athletes. That advantage, in turn, can create pressure for more athletes to cheat in the same way, undermining the basis for the competitions at stake and exacerbating the gap between those who can afford enhancements and those who cannot.The rules of a game can be changed. In sports, novel forms of performance enhancing equipment and training are routinely introduced as athletic technology and expertise evolve. Where issues of athletes equitable access arise, they can be dealt with in one of two ways. Sometimes it is possible to ensure fair distribution, as for example, when the International Olympic Committee negotiated an agreement with the manufacturer of the new "FastSkin" swimming suit to provide suits to all the teams at the Sydney Olympics. In other cases, inequalities may simply come to be accepted as unfortunate but not unfair. This is, for example, how many people would view a story about an equatorial country that could not afford year-round artificial snow for its ski team, and so could not compete evenly with the ski teams of northern countries. If enhancement interventions can either be distributed fairly or the inequities they create can be written into the rules of the social game in question as part of the given advantages of the more fortunate, then individual users no longer face a fairness problem. For those who can afford it, for example, what would be ethically suspect about mounting a mirror image of the "Special Olympics" for athletes with disabilities: a "Super Olympics", featuring athletes universally equipped with the latest modifications and enhancements? For answers to that challenge, the critics of biomedical enhancement have to dig beyond concerns about the fair governance of games to a deeper and broader sense of "cheating", in terms of the corrosive effects of enhancement on the integrity of admirable human practices.[Extracted, with edits, from: "Human Enhancement", Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, revised in May 2019]"Super Olympics", as per the passage

Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.Indian hockey team player {X}, on February 13, 2020, bagged the 2019 FIH Mens Player of the Year award.{X} has become the first member of the India national team to win the Best Player award since the award was initiated in 1999. {X} was up against Belgiums Arthur van Doren and Lucas Vila of Argentina, who finished second and third, respectively.{X} made 260 appearances for the team since making his debut way back in 2011. In 2019, as captain, he led his team to victory in the FIH Olympic Qualifiers, securing a spot at the Olympic Games Tokyo, 2020.The midfielder has also represented India at London 2012 and Rio 2016.{X} said their biggest goal in 2019 was to book the berth at the Olympics."If you look at our year, we did well in every tournament we participated in. Be it the FIH Series finals in June or the test series in Belgium, where we played the hosts as well as Spain and beat them. Our biggest goal in 2019 was to book our berth at the Olympics," International Hockey Federations (FIH) official website quoted Singh as saying.FIH Chief Executive Officer {Y} congratulated all the winners of the 2019 FIH Stars Awards."On behalf of FIH, I would like to extend heartfelt congratulations from the whole hockey community to all winners of the 2019 FIH Stars Awards and also to all nominees. Thanks to their skills and performances, as well as their teammates, they invite fans all over the world to experience great emotions," {Y} said."We are very grateful to them. Athletes, as well as coaches, are the best ambassadors of our sport. I wish all of them every success, in particular those who are involved in the FIH Hockey Pro League and/or the Olympic Games Tokyo, 2020," he added.Earlier, Australia national hockey team coach Colin Batch was named as the FIH Male Coach of the Year 2019, while Dutch womens national team coach Alyson Annan won the FIH Women Coach of the Year 2019 award.Q.Which of the following countries has won 8 gold medals in hockey in the history of Olympics, which is the highest among all countries?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.a)If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.b)If she were to go to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.c)If she becomes the winner of the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.d)In the event that she would win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.e)If she goes to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.a)If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.b)If she were to go to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.c)If she becomes the winner of the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.d)In the event that she would win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.e)If she goes to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.a)If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.b)If she were to go to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.c)If she becomes the winner of the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.d)In the event that she would win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.e)If she goes to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.a)If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.b)If she were to go to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.c)If she becomes the winner of the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.d)In the event that she would win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.e)If she goes to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.a)If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.b)If she were to go to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.c)If she becomes the winner of the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.d)In the event that she would win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.e)If she goes to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.a)If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.b)If she were to go to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.c)If she becomes the winner of the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.d)In the event that she would win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.e)If she goes to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.a)If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.b)If she were to go to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.c)If she becomes the winner of the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.d)In the event that she would win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.e)If she goes to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.a)If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.b)If she were to go to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.c)If she becomes the winner of the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.d)In the event that she would win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.e)If she goes to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.a)If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.b)If she were to go to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.c)If she becomes the winner of the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.d)In the event that she would win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.e)If she goes to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.a)If she were to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.b)If she were to go to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.c)If she becomes the winner of the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.d)In the event that she would win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.e)If she goes to win the Olympic medal, I for one would be surprised.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup