John Locke refuted the doctrine of the divine and absolute rights of the monarch because he was inspired by the humanistic and enlightened viewpoint that all individuals are equal. No individual is created superior by God. Hence, no individual can have any absolute and divine right to rule over others. Instead, in his "Two Treatises of Government", he propounded the idea that the government should rule according to law and with the consent of the people.

John Locke's Refutation of Divine and Absolute Right

Introduction
The doctrine of divine and absolute right maintained that monarchs were ordained by God and had absolute power over their subjects. However, John Locke, an English philosopher, refuted this doctrine in his influential work, Two Treatises of Government.

Locke's Argument
Locke argued that political power was derived from the consent of the governed, not from divine right. He believed that individuals had natural rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that could not be taken away by the government.

Social Contract Theory
Locke's argument was based on the social contract theory, which held that individuals surrendered some of their natural rights to the government in exchange for protection and security. However, the government was only legitimate if it acted in the interests of the people and respected their rights.

Impact
Locke's refutation of divine and absolute right had a significant impact on political thought and played a crucial role in the development of modern democracy. His ideas influenced the American Revolution and the drafting of the United States Constitution, which enshrined the principles of natural rights and limited government.

Conclusion
In conclusion, John Locke's refutation of divine and absolute right challenged the traditional view of monarchs as divinely ordained rulers with absolute power. Instead, he argued that political power should be based on the consent of the governed and that individuals had natural rights that must be respected by the government. His ideas continue to shape modern political thought and inspire movements for democracy and human rights around the world.

Because he was educated and he kept his own point of view. He knew that no person should be able to gain all the powers , he should be divided among all like in the democracy