Consider the following statements regarding the Emergency Use Listing (EUL) by the World Health Organization (WHO):1. The EUL procedure is designed to evaluate only vaccines and therapeutics, excluding In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs).2. Products listed under EUL must be manufactured following Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for medicines and vaccines.3. The EUL is aimed at accelerating the availability of medical products during public health crises.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Consider the following statements regarding ...

Consider the following statements regarding the Emergency Use Listing (EUL) by the World Health Organization (WHO):
1. The EUL procedure is designed to evaluate only vaccines and therapeutics, excluding In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs).
2. Products listed under EUL must be manufactured following Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for medicines and vaccines.
3. The EUL is aimed at accelerating the availability of medical products during public health crises.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

a)
1 Only
b)
1 and 2 Only
c)
1 and 3 Only
d)
1, 2 and 3

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Consider the following statements regarding the Emergency Use Listing...

1. Statement 1: This statement is incorrect. The EUL procedure is not limited to just vaccines and therapeutics; it also includes In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs). This is evident from the recent Emergency Use Listing for an IVD test for mpox, which highlights the inclusion of diagnostics under the EUL procedure.
2. Statement 2: This statement is correct. Products listed under the EUL must indeed be manufactured in accordance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for medicines and vaccines. However, the statement does not mention IVDs, which must be manufactured under a functional Quality Management System (QMS). Since the statement is about GMP specifically, it is technically correct.
3. Statement 3: This statement is correct. The EUL is explicitly aimed at accelerating the availability of medical products during public health emergencies by providing a mechanism to quickly assess their quality, safety, and efficacy.
Thus, the correct statements are 2 and 3. Although the provided answer is Option C: 1 and 3 Only, a careful review shows that the answer should actually be based on correctly understanding the details of the WHO's EUL procedure. Therefore, the correct option should be based on statements 2 and 3 being correct, not 1. Thus, the correct answer should be corrected if needed to reflect these points accurately.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the following question:In terms of labour, for decades the relatively low cost and high quality of Japanese workers conferred considerable competitive advantage across numerous durable goods and consumer electronics industries (eg. Machinery, automobiles, televisions, radios). Then labour-based advantages shifted to South Korea, then to Malaysia, Mexico and other nations. Today, China appears to be capitalizing best on the basis of labour. Japanese firms still remain competitive in markets for such durable goods, electronics and other products, but the labour force is no longer sufficient for competitive advantage over manufacturers in other industrializing nations. Such shifting of labour-based advantage is clearly not limited to manufacturing industries. Today, a huge number of IT and service jobs are moving from Europe and North America to India, Singapore, and like countries with relatively well-educated, low-cost workforces possessing technical skills. However, as educational levels and technical skills continue to rise in other countries, India, Singapore, and like nations enjoying labour-based competitive advantage today are likely to find such advantage cannot be sustained through the emergence of new competitors.In terms of capital, for centuries the days of gold coins and later even paper money restricted financial flows. Subsequently, regional concentrations were formed where large banks, industries and markets coalesced. But today capital flows internationally at rapid speed. Globa commerce no longer requires regional interactions among business players. Regional capital concentrations in places such as New York, London and Tokyo still persist, of course, but the capital concentrated there is no longer sufficient for competitive advantage over other capitalists distributed worldwide. Only if an organization is able to combine, integrate and apply its resources (eg. Land, labour, capital, IT in an effective manner that is not readily imitable by competitors can such an organization enjoy competitive advantage sustainable overtime.In a knowledge-based theory of the firm, this idea is extended to view organizational knowledge as a resource with at least the same level of power and importance as the traditional economic inputs. An organization with superior knowledge can achieve a competitive advantage in markets that appreciate the application of such knowledge. Semiconductors, genetic engineering, pharmaceuticals, software, military warfare, and like knowledge-intensive competitive arenas provide both time-proven and current examples. Consider semiconductors (e.g. computer chips), which are made principally of sand and common metals. These ubiquitous and powerful electronic devices are designed within common office buildings, using commercially available tools, and fabricated within factories in many industrialized nations. Hence, the land is not the key competitive resource in the semiconductor industry.Q. The passage also mentions the trend of

View answer

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.The Pesticide Management Bill, 2020, is a long-overdue law on this critical segment of agriculture, in the making since 2008, to replace the obsolete Insecticides Act, 1968. Globally, India is the fourth-largest producer of pesticides. As a first step, the proposed legislation covers all classes of pesticides, not just insecticides as the current law does.Taking into account advances in modern pest management science and the ill effects of synthetic pesticides, the Pesticide Management Bill should bring India's pesticide sector in line with global norms, to some of which India has signed up. The food safety law already has limits on pesticide residue. It would be desirable for the government to subject the Bill to public comment.The present law addresses manufacturing, sale, import, transport, use, and distribution of insecticides. The Bill will cover the life cycle of pesticides from manufacture to disposal and will include regulation of export, packaging, labelling, pricing, storage, and advertisement. Penalties on manufacturers for non-compliance with rules and regulations would be stiffer.An important focus of the Bill is on labelling-manufacturers will be required by law to specify clear and specific information on material and chemical composition, and dosage of use. The labels must carry this information in the local language to ensure that farmers are properly informed. This is critical. There is a tendency of overuse of pesticides by farmers, often driven by ignorance.The Bill should also have provision for technical assistance to farmers on pesticide use from agriculture extension services centers. This is vital for farm exports. Proposals for a pool for compensating farmers might sound good but would diffuse culpability, which must be rigorously established before seeking compensation. Empowering states to set locally relevant norms would be a good idea.While the Bill is a major step forward, it needs to go beyond regulating chemical pesticides. It must take into account non-synthetic pesticides, including research and development.Q. If a manufacturer is supplying pesticides to the farmers at a village in Tamil Nadu. What is the most important thing for the manufacturer to ensure according to the proposed Pesticide Management Bill, 2020?

View answer

Since the late 1970’s, faced with severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the US have been trying to improve productivity—and therefore enhance their international competitiveness—through cost-cutting programs. (Cost-cutting here is defined as raising labor output while holding the amount of labor constant.) However, from 1978 through 1982, productivity—the value of goods manufactured divided by the amount of labor—did not improve; and while the results were better in the business upturn of the three years following, they ran 25 percent lower than productivity improvements during earlier, post-1945 upturns. ##At the same time, it became clear that the harder manufacturers worked to implement cost-cutting, the more they lost their competitive edge.When I recently visited 25 companies; it became clear to me that the cost-cutting approach to increasing productivity is fundamentally flawed. Manufacturing regularly observes a “40, 40, 20” rule. Roughly 40 percent of any manufacturing-based competitive advantage derives from long-term changes in manufacturing structure (decisions about the number, size, location, and capacity of facilities) and in approaches to materials. Another 40 percent comes from major changes in equipment and process technology. The final 20 percent rests on implementing conventional cost-cutting. This does not mean cost-cutting should not be tried. Approaches like simplifying jobs and retraining employees to work smarter, not harder—do produce results. But the tools quickly reach the limits of what they can contribute.Cost-cutting approach hinders innovation and discourages creative people. An industry can easily become prisoner of its own investments in cost-cutting techniques, reducing its ability to develop new products. Managers under pressure to maximize cost-cutting will resist innovation because they know that more fundamental changes in processes or systems will wreak havoc with the results on which they are measured. Production managers have always seen their job as one of minimizing costs and maximizing output. This dimension of performance has created a penny-pinching, mechanistic culture in most factories that has kept away creative managers. Successful companies have overcome this problem by developing and implementing a strategy that focuses on the manufacturing structure and on equipment and process technology. In one company a manufacturing strategy that allowed different areas of the factory to specialize in different markets replaced the conventional cost-cutting approach; within three years the company regained its competitive advantage. Together with such strategies, successful companies are also encouraging managers to focus on a wider set of objectives besides cutting costs. There is hope for manufacturing, but it clearly rests on a different way of managing.Q. As inferred from the first paragraph, the manufacturers expected that the measures they implemented would

View answer

Since the late 1970’s, faced with severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the US have been trying to improve productivity—and therefore enhance their international competitiveness—through cost-cutting programs. (Cost-cutting here is defined as raising labor output while holding the amount of labor constant.) However, from 1978 through 1982, productivity—the value of goods manufactured divided by the amount of labor—did not improve; and while the results were better in the business upturn of the three years following, they ran 25 percent lower than productivity improvements during earlier, post-1945 upturns. ##At the same time, it became clear that the harder manufacturers worked to implement cost-cutting, the more they lost their competitive edge.When I recently visited 25 companies; it became clear to me that the cost-cutting approach to increasing productivity is fundamentally flawed. Manufacturing regularly observes a “40, 40, 20” rule. Roughly 40 percent of any manufacturing-based competitive advantage derives from long-term changes in manufacturing structure (decisions about the number, size, location, and capacity of facilities) and in approaches to materials. Another 40 percent comes from major changes in equipment and process technology. The final 20 percent rests on implementing conventional cost-cutting. This does not mean cost-cutting should not be tried. Approaches like simplifying jobs and retraining employees to work smarter, not harder—do produce results. But the tools quickly reach the limits of what they can contribute.Cost-cutting approach hinders innovation and discourages creative people. An industry can easily become prisoner of its own investments in cost-cutting techniques, reducing its ability to develop new products. Managers under pressure to maximize cost-cutting will resist innovation because they know that more fundamental changes in processes or systems will wreak havoc with the results on which they are measured. Production managers have always seen their job as one of minimizing costs and maximizing output. This dimension of performance has created a penny-pinching, mechanistic culture in most factories that has kept away creative managers. Successful companies have overcome this problem by developing and implementing a strategy that focuses on the manufacturing structure and on equipment and process technology. In one company a manufacturing strategy that allowed different areas of the factory to specialize in different markets replaced the conventional cost-cutting approach; within three years the company regained its competitive advantage. Together with such strategies, successful companies are also encouraging managers to focus on a wider set of objectives besides cutting costs. There is hope for manufacturing, but it clearly rests on a different way of managing.Q. The author’s attitude toward the culture in most factories is best described as

View answer

Since the late 1970’s, faced with severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the US have been trying to improve productivity—and therefore enhance their international competitiveness—through cost-cutting programs. (Cost-cutting here is defined as raising labor output while holding the amount of labor constant.) However, from 1978 through 1982, productivity—the value of goods manufactured divided by the amount of labor—did not improve; and while the results were better in the business upturn of the three years following, they ran 25 percent lower than productivity improvements during earlier, post-1945 upturns. ##At the same time, it became clear that the harder manufacturers worked to implement cost-cutting, the more they lost their competitive edge.When I recently visited 25 companies; it became clear to me that the cost-cutting approach to increasing productivity is fundamentally flawed. Manufacturing regularly observes a “40, 40, 20” rule. Roughly 40 percent of any manufacturing-based competitive advantage derives from long-term changes in manufacturing structure (decisions about the number, size, location, and capacity of facilities) and in approaches to materials. Another 40 percent comes from major changes in equipment and process technology. The final 20 percent rests on implementing conventional cost-cutting. This does not mean cost-cutting should not be tried. Approaches like simplifying jobs and retraining employees to work smarter, not harder—do produce results. But the tools quickly reach the limits of what they can contribute.Cost-cutting approach hinders innovation and discourages creative people. An industry can easily become prisoner of its own investments in cost-cutting techniques, reducing its ability to develop new products. Managers under pressure to maximize cost-cutting will resist innovation because they know that more fundamental changes in processes or systems will wreak havoc with the results on which they are measured. Production managers have always seen their job as one of minimizing costs and maximizing output. This dimension of performance has created a penny-pinching, mechanistic culture in most factories that has kept away creative managers. Successful companies have overcome this problem by developing and implementing a strategy that focuses on the manufacturing structure and on equipment and process technology. In one company a manufacturing strategy that allowed different areas of the factory to specialize in different markets replaced the conventional cost-cutting approach; within three years the company regained its competitive advantage. Together with such strategies, successful companies are also encouraging managers to focus on a wider set of objectives besides cutting costs. There is hope for manufacturing, but it clearly rests on a different way of managing.Q. Which figure of speech is used in the sentence enclosed within **?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Consider the following statements regarding the Emergency Use Listing (EUL) by the World Health Organization (WHO):1. The EUL procedure is designed to evaluate only vaccines and therapeutics, excluding In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs).2. Products listed under EUL must be manufactured following Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for medicines and vaccines.3. The EUL is aimed at accelerating the availability of medical products during public health crises.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Consider the following statements regarding the Emergency Use Listing (EUL) by the World Health Organization (WHO):1. The EUL procedure is designed to evaluate only vaccines and therapeutics, excluding In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs).2. Products listed under EUL must be manufactured following Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for medicines and vaccines.3. The EUL is aimed at accelerating the availability of medical products during public health crises.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements regarding the Emergency Use Listing (EUL) by the World Health Organization (WHO):1. The EUL procedure is designed to evaluate only vaccines and therapeutics, excluding In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs).2. Products listed under EUL must be manufactured following Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for medicines and vaccines.3. The EUL is aimed at accelerating the availability of medical products during public health crises.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements regarding the Emergency Use Listing (EUL) by the World Health Organization (WHO):1. The EUL procedure is designed to evaluate only vaccines and therapeutics, excluding In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs).2. Products listed under EUL must be manufactured following Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for medicines and vaccines.3. The EUL is aimed at accelerating the availability of medical products during public health crises.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Consider the following statements regarding the Emergency Use Listing (EUL) by the World Health Organization (WHO):1. The EUL procedure is designed to evaluate only vaccines and therapeutics, excluding In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs).2. Products listed under EUL must be manufactured following Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for medicines and vaccines.3. The EUL is aimed at accelerating the availability of medical products during public health crises.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following statements regarding the Emergency Use Listing (EUL) by the World Health Organization (WHO):1. The EUL procedure is designed to evaluate only vaccines and therapeutics, excluding In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs).2. Products listed under EUL must be manufactured following Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for medicines and vaccines.3. The EUL is aimed at accelerating the availability of medical products during public health crises.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Consider the following statements regarding the Emergency Use Listing (EUL) by the World Health Organization (WHO):1. The EUL procedure is designed to evaluate only vaccines and therapeutics, excluding In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs).2. Products listed under EUL must be manufactured following Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for medicines and vaccines.3. The EUL is aimed at accelerating the availability of medical products during public health crises.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following statements regarding the Emergency Use Listing (EUL) by the World Health Organization (WHO):1. The EUL procedure is designed to evaluate only vaccines and therapeutics, excluding In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs).2. Products listed under EUL must be manufactured following Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for medicines and vaccines.3. The EUL is aimed at accelerating the availability of medical products during public health crises.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following statements regarding the Emergency Use Listing (EUL) by the World Health Organization (WHO):1. The EUL procedure is designed to evaluate only vaccines and therapeutics, excluding In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs).2. Products listed under EUL must be manufactured following Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for medicines and vaccines.3. The EUL is aimed at accelerating the availability of medical products during public health crises.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Consider the following statements regarding the Emergency Use Listing (EUL) by the World Health Organization (WHO):1. The EUL procedure is designed to evaluate only vaccines and therapeutics, excluding In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs).2. Products listed under EUL must be manufactured following Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for medicines and vaccines.3. The EUL is aimed at accelerating the availability of medical products during public health crises.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam