UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  Consider the following statements:Statement-I... Start Learning for Free
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
The Supreme Court's recent ruling allows for the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) to extend reservations to more disadvantaged segments within these groups.
Statement-II:
The Supreme Court's decision in the E.V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004) case asserted the sub-classification for the purpose of reservation.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
  • a)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
  • b)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
  • c)
    Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
  • d)
    Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Courts recen...
Statement-I correctly reflects the recent ruling by the Supreme Court, which allows for the sub-classification of SCs and STs to extend reservations to more disadvantaged segments within these groups. However, Statement-II is inaccurate in portraying the Supreme Court's decision in the E.V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004) case, where the court ruled that sub-classification among Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservation would violate the right to equality and said that the SC list must be treated as a single, homogenous group. 
Therefore Correct Answer: Option-C
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

Top Courses for UPSC

Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Courts recent ruling allows for the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) to extend reservations to more disadvantaged segments within these groups.Statement-II:The Supreme Courts decision in the E.V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004) case asserted the sub-classification for the purpose of reservation.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Courts recent ruling allows for the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) to extend reservations to more disadvantaged segments within these groups.Statement-II:The Supreme Courts decision in the E.V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004) case asserted the sub-classification for the purpose of reservation.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Courts recent ruling allows for the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) to extend reservations to more disadvantaged segments within these groups.Statement-II:The Supreme Courts decision in the E.V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004) case asserted the sub-classification for the purpose of reservation.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Courts recent ruling allows for the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) to extend reservations to more disadvantaged segments within these groups.Statement-II:The Supreme Courts decision in the E.V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004) case asserted the sub-classification for the purpose of reservation.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Courts recent ruling allows for the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) to extend reservations to more disadvantaged segments within these groups.Statement-II:The Supreme Courts decision in the E.V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004) case asserted the sub-classification for the purpose of reservation.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Courts recent ruling allows for the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) to extend reservations to more disadvantaged segments within these groups.Statement-II:The Supreme Courts decision in the E.V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004) case asserted the sub-classification for the purpose of reservation.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Courts recent ruling allows for the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) to extend reservations to more disadvantaged segments within these groups.Statement-II:The Supreme Courts decision in the E.V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004) case asserted the sub-classification for the purpose of reservation.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Courts recent ruling allows for the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) to extend reservations to more disadvantaged segments within these groups.Statement-II:The Supreme Courts decision in the E.V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004) case asserted the sub-classification for the purpose of reservation.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Courts recent ruling allows for the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) to extend reservations to more disadvantaged segments within these groups.Statement-II:The Supreme Courts decision in the E.V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004) case asserted the sub-classification for the purpose of reservation.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Consider the following statements:Statement-I:The Supreme Courts recent ruling allows for the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) to extend reservations to more disadvantaged segments within these groups.Statement-II:The Supreme Courts decision in the E.V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004) case asserted the sub-classification for the purpose of reservation.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-Ib)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-Ic)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrectd)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correctCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev