UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > Consider the following pairs regarding the sc...
Start Learning for Free
Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and proper/improper use of President's Rule (Article 356) in India:
1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends President's Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.
2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the President's satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.
3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the President's satisfaction in invoking Article 356.
4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking President's Rule as per the Bommai case.
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
- a)Only one pair
- b)Only two pairs
- c)Only three pairs
- d)All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review an...
1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends President's Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections. Correct. The Sarkaria Commission indeed recommended that President's Rule can be imposed in the case of a hung assembly.
2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the President's satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review. Incorrect. The Bommai Case established that the President's satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is subject to judicial review, contrary to the statement.
3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the President's satisfaction in invoking Article 356. Correct. The 44th Amendment Act of 1978 indeed allowed for judicial review of the President's satisfaction in invoking Article 356.
4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking President's Rule as per the Bommai case. Correct. The Bommai case concluded that anti-secular activities by a state government could be grounds for invoking President's Rule, as secularism is a basic feature of the Constitution.
Thus, pairs 1, 3, and 4 are correctly matched, while pair 2 is incorrectly matched. Therefore, the correct answer is Option B: Only two pairs.
Most Upvoted Answer
Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review an...
Understanding the Pairs
To analyze the correctness of the pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and the use of President's Rule under Article 356 in India, we need to evaluate each statement.
1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.
- Correct: The Sarkaria Commission indeed suggested that President’s Rule could be invoked in cases of hung assemblies, emphasizing the need for stable governance.
2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.
- Incorrect: The Bommai case (1994) established that while the President’s satisfaction is important, it is subject to judicial review under certain circumstances, particularly if the grounds for invoking it are mala fide or not based on facts.
3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.
- Correct: The 44th Amendment Act introduced provisions that allow for judicial review of the President’s satisfaction regarding the need for President’s Rule, reinforcing checks on executive power.
4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.
- Correct: The Bommai judgment recognized that anti-secularism by a state government could be a valid ground for invoking President’s Rule, emphasizing the importance of upholding constitutional values.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis:
- Correctly matched pairs: 1, 3, and 4 are correct.
- Incorrectly matched pair: 2 is incorrect.
Thus, the answer is option 'C': Only three pairs are correctly matched.
To analyze the correctness of the pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and the use of President's Rule under Article 356 in India, we need to evaluate each statement.
1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.
- Correct: The Sarkaria Commission indeed suggested that President’s Rule could be invoked in cases of hung assemblies, emphasizing the need for stable governance.
2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.
- Incorrect: The Bommai case (1994) established that while the President’s satisfaction is important, it is subject to judicial review under certain circumstances, particularly if the grounds for invoking it are mala fide or not based on facts.
3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.
- Correct: The 44th Amendment Act introduced provisions that allow for judicial review of the President’s satisfaction regarding the need for President’s Rule, reinforcing checks on executive power.
4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.
- Correct: The Bommai judgment recognized that anti-secularism by a state government could be a valid ground for invoking President’s Rule, emphasizing the importance of upholding constitutional values.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis:
- Correctly matched pairs: 1, 3, and 4 are correct.
- Incorrectly matched pair: 2 is incorrect.
Thus, the answer is option 'C': Only three pairs are correctly matched.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Similar UPSC Doubts
Top Courses for UPSCView all
Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and proper/improper use of Presidents Rule (Article 356) in India:1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and proper/improper use of Presidents Rule (Article 356) in India:1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and proper/improper use of Presidents Rule (Article 356) in India:1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and proper/improper use of Presidents Rule (Article 356) in India:1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and proper/improper use of Presidents Rule (Article 356) in India:1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and proper/improper use of Presidents Rule (Article 356) in India:1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and proper/improper use of Presidents Rule (Article 356) in India:1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and proper/improper use of Presidents Rule (Article 356) in India:1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and proper/improper use of Presidents Rule (Article 356) in India:1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and proper/improper use of Presidents Rule (Article 356) in India:1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and proper/improper use of Presidents Rule (Article 356) in India:1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and proper/improper use of Presidents Rule (Article 356) in India:1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Consider the following pairs regarding the scope of judicial review and proper/improper use of Presidents Rule (Article 356) in India:1. Sarkaria Commission: Recommends Presidents Rule in case of a hung assembly after general elections.2. Bommai Case: Establishes that the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356 is final and not subject to judicial review.3. 44th Amendment Act of 1978: Allows for judicial review of the Presidents satisfaction in invoking Article 356.4. Anti-secular politics by state government: Grounds for invoking Presidents Rule as per the Bommai case.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?a)Only one pairb)Only two pairsc)Only three pairsd)All four pairsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup