What is one of the main criticisms of the Electoral College system in the United States?a) It guarantees that all states have equal representationb) It allows for a direct election of the Presidentc) It leads to candidates focusing primarily on swing statesd) It eliminates the need for political partiesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > What is one of the main criticisms of the Ele...

Join the Discussion on the App

What is one of the main criticisms of the Electoral College system in the United States?

a)
It guarantees that all states have equal representation
b)
It allows for a direct election of the President
c)
It leads to candidates focusing primarily on swing states
d)
It eliminates the need for political parties

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Daily Current Affairs MCQ: 1st November 2024

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

What is one of the main criticisms of the Electoral College system in ...

A significant criticism of the Electoral College is that it causes presidential candidates to concentrate their campaign efforts on swing states—those that could reasonably be won by either major political party—while neglecting states where one party has a clear majority. This focus can lead to a disproportionate influence of certain states on the election outcome, which some argue undermines the principle of equal representation for all voters.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Proposed in 2007, the Lisbon Treaty was ratified by most member states in 2008, but a referendum in Ireland-the only country that put the Lisbon agreement to a public vote-rejected it on June 12, 2008, thus jeopardizing the entire treaty. More than a year later, on October 2, 2009, Ireland held a second referendum, which passed.Poland's government also had expressed reservations, but it ratified the treaty a week after the Irish vote, after securing opt-outs from EU policy on some social issues, such as abortion. The Czech Republic was the last remaining holdout: though its Parliament had ratified the treaty, the country's president, Václav Klaus, withheld his signature. Finally, after the Czech courts ruled that the treaty did not violate the country's constitution; Klaus signed it on November 3, 2009. The Lisbon Treaty, thus ratified by all 27 member states, entered into force on December 1, 2009.While it was not explicitly called a European constitution, the treaty addressed a number of issues that had been central to the 2004 EU draft constitution, an initiative that was scuttled after voters in France and the Netherlands rejected it in 2005. Under the amendments of the Lisbon Treaty, the European Community-which had provided the economic framework upon which the EU was built, disappeared, and its powers and structure were incorporated into the EU. Moreover, the office of a permanent EU president was created, with the president chosen by the leaders of the member countries from a pool of candidates that they had selected. The leader holding this two-and-a-half-year post, officially called the president of the European Council, would provide a "face" for the EU in matters of Union policy. The rotating EU presidency, whereby each member country assumes a leadership role for a period of six months, was retained, although its mandate would be narrowed. Another new position that of high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, gathered the EU's two foreign affairs portfolios into a single office, with the goal of creating a more robust and unified European foreign policy. The power of the European Parliament also was enhanced and its number of seats revised. Additionally, the Charter of Fundamental Rights, initially proposed at the Council of Nice in 2000, entered into force as part of the Lisbon Treaty. It spelled out a host of civil, political, economic, and social rights guaranteed to all citizens of the EU.For most of the decisions, 55 percent of member states, provided they represented 65 percent of the EU's population, would be able to approve a measure. This "double majority" voting rule, which represents a simplification of the former system of weighted votes, would be phased in over time. Matters of defence, foreign policy, social security, and taxation require the "double majority (DM)" rule. DM was designed to streamline decision making at the highest levels, and critics argued that it would reduce the influence of smaller countries at the expense of larger ones.Q. Which of the following views can be correctly attributed to the author's criticism of the double majority rule?

View answer

Read the passage below and answer the question."Fake News" is a real phenomenon. There are sleazy predators who cook up completely apocryphal news stories and try to get them circulated on social media and on the internet. But its a terrible pollution of the language for the president to call any article that criticizes him "fake news." If you compare the credibility of the presidents statement with those of the mainstream media, theres just no comparison. The presidents been called out on lie after lie after lie. And as someone whos often written for the so-called "mainstream media," for all their flaws, they got fact-checkers. They wont let me just write anything that comes into my head, Ive got to prove it. So thats the kind of standard that has established the credibility of many of the news media.And the basis of democracy is that everyone can be criticized, particularly the leaders. We dont have a monarch, a Supreme Leader, or a dictator for life. Weve got a person who is temporarily in charge of the government and when he makes an error, it is mandatory for the free press to call it out. To try to delegitimize the press whenever it criticizes the president, its really the reflex of an autocrat, of a tin-pot dictator in some banana republic and not worthy of a democracy like the United States where the president serves in our pleasure and can be criticized just like anyone else.Q.What role does the authors claim that the even president can be criticised play in the argument in the passage?

View answer

The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Sec. 126 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, which deals with the contract of guarantee, has defined it as a contract to perform the promise, or discharge the liability of a third person in case of his defaults. Contracts of guarantees may be classified into two types: specific guarantee and continuing guarantee. When a guarantee is given in respect of a single debt or specific transaction and is to come to an end when the guaranteed debt is paid or the promise is duly performed, it is called a specific or simple guarantee. However, a guarantee which extends to a series of transactions is called a continuing guarantee. The suretys liability, in this case, would continue till all the transactions are completed or till the guarantor revokes the guarantee as to the future transactions.A continuing guarantee is defined under Section 129 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. A continuing guarantee is a type of guarantee which applies to a series of transactions. It applies to all the transactions entered into by the principal debtor until it is revoked by the surety. Therefore, bankers always prefer to have a continuing guarantee so that the guarantors liability is not limited to the original advances and would also extend to all subsequent debts.The most important feature of a continuing guarantee is that it applies to a series of separable, distinct transactions. Therefore, when a guarantee is given for an entire consideration, it cannot be termed as a continuing guarantee.So far as a guarantee given for an existing debt is concerned, it cannot be revoked, as once an offer is accepted it becomes final. However, a continuing guarantee can be revoked for future transactions. In that case, the surety shall be liable for those transactions which have already taken place.After making a payment and discharging the liability of the principal debtor, the surety gets various rights. These rights can be studied under three heads:Rights against the principal debtors: In every contract of guarantee, there is an implied promise by the principal debtor to indemnify the surety, and the surety is entitled to recover from the principal debtor whatever sum he has rightfully paid under the guarantee. This is because the surety has suffered a loss due to the non-fulfilment of promise by the principal debtor and therefore the surety has a right to be compensated by the debtorOn the default of payment by the principal debtor, when the surety pays off the debt of the principal debtor he becomes entitled to claim all the securities which were given by the principal debtor to the creditor. The surety has the right to all securities whether received before or after the creation of the guarantee and it is also immaterial whether the surety has knowledge of those securities or not.Q.Lal gave his house to Tanu on a lease for ten years on a specified lease rent. Quzi guaranteed that Tanu would fulfil his obligations. After seven years, Tanu stopped paying the lease rent. Lal sued him for the payment of rent. Quzi then gave a notice revoking his guarantee for the remaining three years.

View answer

The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Sec. 126 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, which deals with the contract of guarantee, has defined it as a contract to perform the promise, or discharge the liability of a third person in case of his defaults. Contracts of guarantees may be classified into two types: specific guarantee and continuing guarantee. When a guarantee is given in respect of a single debt or specific transaction and is to come to an end when the guaranteed debt is paid or the promise is duly performed, it is called a specific or simple guarantee. However, a guarantee which extends to a series of transactions is called a continuing guarantee. The suretys liability, in this case, would continue till all the transactions are completed or till the guarantor revokes the guarantee as to the future transactions.A continuing guarantee is defined under Section 129 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. A continuing guarantee is a type of guarantee which applies to a series of transactions. It applies to all the transactions entered into by the principal debtor until it is revoked by the surety. Therefore, bankers always prefer to have a continuing guarantee so that the guarantors liability is not limited to the original advances and would also extend to all subsequent debts.The most important feature of a continuing guarantee is that it applies to a series of separable, distinct transactions. Therefore, when a guarantee is given for an entire consideration, it cannot be termed as a continuing guarantee.So far as a guarantee given for an existing debt is concerned, it cannot be revoked, as once an offer is accepted it becomes final. However, a continuing guarantee can be revoked for future transactions. In that case, the surety shall be liable for those transactions which have already taken place.After making a payment and discharging the liability of the principal debtor, the surety gets various rights. These rights can be studied under three heads:Rights against the principal debtors: In every contract of guarantee, there is an implied promise by the principal debtor to indemnify the surety, and the surety is entitled to recover from the principal debtor whatever sum he has rightfully paid under the guarantee. This is because the surety has suffered a loss due to the non-fulfilment of promise by the principal debtor and therefore the surety has a right to be compensated by the debtorOn the default of payment by the principal debtor, when the surety pays off the debt of the principal debtor he becomes entitled to claim all the securities which were given by the principal debtor to the creditor. The surety has the right to all securities whether received before or after the creation of the guarantee and it is also immaterial whether the surety has knowledge of those securities or not.Q.Chirag guarantees to Diya to the extent of Rs. 10,000 in August that Elle shall pay for all the goods bought by him during the next three months. Chirag gives a notice of revocation. Diya sells goods worth Rs. 6,000 to Elle in January. Decide.

View answer

The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Sec. 126 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, which deals with the contract of guarantee, has defined it as a contract to perform the promise, or discharge the liability of a third person in case of his defaults. Contracts of guarantees may be classified into two types: specific guarantee and continuing guarantee. When a guarantee is given in respect of a single debt or specific transaction and is to come to an end when the guaranteed debt is paid or the promise is duly performed, it is called a specific or simple guarantee. However, a guarantee which extends to a series of transactions is called a continuing guarantee. The suretys liability, in this case, would continue till all the transactions are completed or till the guarantor revokes the guarantee as to the future transactions.A continuing guarantee is defined under Section 129 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. A continuing guarantee is a type of guarantee which applies to a series of transactions. It applies to all the transactions entered into by the principal debtor until it is revoked by the surety. Therefore, bankers always prefer to have a continuing guarantee so that the guarantors liability is not limited to the original advances and would also extend to all subsequent debts.The most important feature of a continuing guarantee is that it applies to a series of separable, distinct transactions. Therefore, when a guarantee is given for an entire consideration, it cannot be termed as a continuing guarantee.So far as a guarantee given for an existing debt is concerned, it cannot be revoked, as once an offer is accepted it becomes final. However, a continuing guarantee can be revoked for future transactions. In that case, the surety shall be liable for those transactions which have already taken place.After making a payment and discharging the liability of the principal debtor, the surety gets various rights. These rights can be studied under three heads:Rights against the principal debtors: In every contract of guarantee, there is an implied promise by the principal debtor to indemnify the surety, and the surety is entitled to recover from the principal debtor whatever sum he has rightfully paid under the guarantee. This is because the surety has suffered a loss due to the non-fulfilment of promise by the principal debtor and therefore the surety has a right to be compensated by the debtorOn the default of payment by the principal debtor, when the surety pays off the debt of the principal debtor he becomes entitled to claim all the securities which were given by the principal debtor to the creditor. The surety has the right to all securities whether received before or after the creation of the guarantee and it is also immaterial whether the surety has knowledge of those securities or not.Q.Chirag guarantees to Diya to the extent of Rs. 10,000 in August that Elle shall pay for all the goods bought by him during the next three months. Chirag gives a notice of revocation. Diya sells goods worth Rs. 6,000 to Elle in January. Decide.

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

What is one of the main criticisms of the Electoral College system in the United States?a) It guarantees that all states have equal representationb) It allows for a direct election of the Presidentc) It leads to candidates focusing primarily on swing statesd) It eliminates the need for political partiesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
What is one of the main criticisms of the Electoral College system in the United States?a) It guarantees that all states have equal representationb) It allows for a direct election of the Presidentc) It leads to candidates focusing primarily on swing statesd) It eliminates the need for political partiesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about What is one of the main criticisms of the Electoral College system in the United States?a) It guarantees that all states have equal representationb) It allows for a direct election of the Presidentc) It leads to candidates focusing primarily on swing statesd) It eliminates the need for political partiesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What is one of the main criticisms of the Electoral College system in the United States?a) It guarantees that all states have equal representationb) It allows for a direct election of the Presidentc) It leads to candidates focusing primarily on swing statesd) It eliminates the need for political partiesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for What is one of the main criticisms of the Electoral College system in the United States?a) It guarantees that all states have equal representationb) It allows for a direct election of the Presidentc) It leads to candidates focusing primarily on swing statesd) It eliminates the need for political partiesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of What is one of the main criticisms of the Electoral College system in the United States?a) It guarantees that all states have equal representationb) It allows for a direct election of the Presidentc) It leads to candidates focusing primarily on swing statesd) It eliminates the need for political partiesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What is one of the main criticisms of the Electoral College system in the United States?a) It guarantees that all states have equal representationb) It allows for a direct election of the Presidentc) It leads to candidates focusing primarily on swing statesd) It eliminates the need for political partiesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What is one of the main criticisms of the Electoral College system in the United States?a) It guarantees that all states have equal representationb) It allows for a direct election of the Presidentc) It leads to candidates focusing primarily on swing statesd) It eliminates the need for political partiesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What is one of the main criticisms of the Electoral College system in the United States?a) It guarantees that all states have equal representationb) It allows for a direct election of the Presidentc) It leads to candidates focusing primarily on swing statesd) It eliminates the need for political partiesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What is one of the main criticisms of the Electoral College system in the United States?a) It guarantees that all states have equal representationb) It allows for a direct election of the Presidentc) It leads to candidates focusing primarily on swing statesd) It eliminates the need for political partiesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam