What was a significant outcome of the recent India-China border deal?a) Increase in direct flights between the two countriesb) Resumption of patrolling rights along the Line of Actual Controlc) Complete withdrawal of troops from the borderd) Normalization of trade relations between India and ChinaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > What was a significant outcome of the recent ...

Join the Discussion on the App

What was a significant outcome of the recent India-China border deal?

a)
Increase in direct flights between the two countries
b)
Resumption of patrolling rights along the Line of Actual Control
c)
Complete withdrawal of troops from the border
d)
Normalization of trade relations between India and China

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Weekly Current Affairs: October 22nd to 31st

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

What was a significant outcome of the recent India-China border deal?a...

The recent border deal between India and China primarily resulted in the resumption of patrolling rights along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). This agreement allows both nations' soldiers to patrol designated areas, marking a step towards reducing military tensions that have escalated since the Galwan clash in 2020. While the deal is a significant diplomatic achievement, it does not address all underlying issues, such as direct flights and trade relations.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The southwest monsoon 2020 has officially drawn to an end with the India Meteorological Department (I.M.D.) declaring a withdrawal of the associated winds and rainfall pattern from India on Wednesday. The over 8% surplus this year has surpassed the I.M.D.'s estimates. For the first time since 2010 , India got more than 100% of its long period average (L.P.A.) of 8 cm in consecutive years. Last year the country saw record rainfall of 110% of the L.P.A., the highest in a quarter-century. India has never got over 105% of the L.P.A. in consecutive years in at least 30 years, according to records available since 1988 on the I.M.D. website. Meteorologists often speak of two or three decades 'epochs' of rainfall variation. Since 2000 , India was in a low patch with several drought years and had barely a handful of above normal or excess rainfall. In that light, the two years of a munificent monsoon could signal a possible return to a rainy epoch. While it could mean more rain, it also implies floods, overflowing dams, landslides and loss of lives.Moreover, surplus rains are not evenly distributed in time and space. Therefore, much like there are attempts to improve flood forecast warnings - especially the short-term ones - there ought to be commensurate efforts by authorities and infrastructure agencies to prepare for the environmental and ecological impact of excess rain. This year the I.M.D. undertook a long-due revision of the onset and withdrawal dates of the monsoon in India. By this reckoning, the monsoon's normal withdrawal date was October 15. Historically, this has always been a statistical average and the actual withdrawal is usually within a few days of this. However, this year the withdrawal has been extremely delayed. Factoring in these changes must become a key part of a State and city's disaster management preparedness.Q. By the calculations made by IMD, which date was expected to be the monsoon's normal withdrawal date in 2020 .

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The southwest monsoon 2020 has officially drawn to an end with the India Meteorological Department (I.M.D.) declaring a withdrawal of the associated winds and rainfall pattern from India on Wednesday. The over 8% surplus this year has surpassed the I.M.D.'s estimates. For the first time since 2010 , India got more than 100% of its long period average (L.P.A.) of 8 cm in consecutive years. Last year the country saw record rainfall of 110% of the L.P.A., the highest in a quarter-century. India has never got over 105% of the L.P.A. in consecutive years in at least 30 years, according to records available since 1988 on the I.M.D. website. Meteorologists often speak of two or three decades 'epochs' of rainfall variation. Since 2000 , India was in a low patch with several drought years and had barely a handful of above normal or excess rainfall. In that light, the two years of a munificent monsoon could signal a possible return to a rainy epoch. While it could mean more rain, it also implies floods, overflowing dams, landslides and loss of lives.Moreover, surplus rains are not evenly distributed in time and space. Therefore, much like there are attempts to improve flood forecast warnings - especially the short-term ones - there ought to be commensurate efforts by authorities and infrastructure agencies to prepare for the environmental and ecological impact of excess rain. This year the I.M.D. undertook a long-due revision of the onset and withdrawal dates of the monsoon in India. By this reckoning, the monsoon's normal withdrawal date was October 15. Historically, this has always been a statistical average and the actual withdrawal is usually within a few days of this. However, this year the withdrawal has been extremely delayed. Factoring in these changes must become a key part of a State and city's disaster management preparedness.Q. What can be inferred from the lines- "In that light, the two years of a munificent monsoon could signal a possible return to a rainy epoch" from the passage?

View answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In the run-up to the annual Spring Meetings of the World Bank and the IMF in the second week of April, there was much talk that the two organisations were on the cusp of change. Multiple crises are demanding attention from the international community. But these institutions, once central players in the management of the international economic order, seem to have little to offer as effective managers in the current conjuncture. Hence the need for change. Two factors account for their loss of significance or even descent into irrelevance. The first is that these dominant multilateral bodies once accounted for a significant share of the cross-border flows of finance from the capitalist North to the Global South but are now minor players in the global movement of capital. The share of yield-seeking or even predatory private capital in total flows has increased enormously as the distribution of the surpluses generated globally concentrate in the hands of these private players rather than in the hands of governments, including those in high-income countries. The second is that even the surpluses that remain in the hands of public players are no more concentrated with G7 governments but are spread across governments of countries outside the North, varying from the oil exporters to the now dominant or newly emerging global-manufacturing hubs, especially an increasingly combative China. The Bretton Woods twins, established at a time when the international order looked very different, have a structure of governance and decision-making (dominated by the G7, especially the US) that does not correspond to the current distribution of global economic (even if not military) power.These dissonant features have developed at a time when the need for multilateral action is urgent, given multiple global challenges. External debt crises overwhelm a large number of low- and middle-income countries that accumulated excess debt during the years when high-income-country governments and central banks injected cheap liquidity into the international system and the COVID pandemic and the spike in food and fuel prices pushed poorer countries into soaking up that liquidity. The result is debt stress and widespread default. With a fragmented creditor community unable to offer viable paths to resolution, adjustment in countries overwhelmed by debt is forcing austerity on populations least able to bear more burdens.Q.According to the passage, what has contributed to the decreased significance of the World Bank and IMF in the global movement of capital?

View answer

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The global distribution of surpluses and deficits in the balance of payments, or the excesses or shortfall in foreign exchange earnings vis-à-vis expenditures, has for multiple reasons been in constant flux. This has implications for the directions in which capital must flow or surpluses must be recycled to deficit countries to ensure global stability and prevent the disruption of development in those countries. One factor that influences the distribution of surpluses and deficits is the uneven development of capitalism with a small set of ‘advanced economies’ at one pole recording surpluses and a large number of less developed or underdeveloped countries recording deficits. This changed, however, when starting in the 1970s, the United States began recording deficits, as it lost competitiveness in trade. In addition, the oil shocks of the 1970s in the form of a spike in prices resulted in a widening of the current account surpluses of the oil exporting countries. These factors blurred the distinction between surplus earning advanced economies and deficit burdened low- and idle-income countries (LMICs).These trends in the balance of payments have been accompanied by financial flows which too have seen significant changes. One change is that flows from governments in the advanced economies that are members of the Paris Club of creditors have been declining, with much of the official flows from these countries being mediated through the multilateral financial institutions. The second is a sharp rise in private capital flows, from commercial banks and private bondholders in search of yields from the advanced capitalist economies to the low and middle income countries. The third is that high growth and large current account surpluses in China have been accompanied by significant bilateral flows from China to the deficit-burdened less developed countries. These changes have made it extremely difficult to generate agreement on the debt forgiveness needed for the poorest countries to stabilise their balance of payments and address structural issues that make their balance of payments fragile. In the event, adjustment has taken the form of austerity in the debt stressed countries, which reduces employment and real incomes of the already poor to curtail imports of essentials in order to reduce deficits. That this is underway is clear from the fact that the current account deficit of the Emerging Markets and Developed economies (EMDEs) excluding China and the OPEC has fallen.Q.What factors have significantly complicated the process of reaching a consensus on the crucial debt forgiveness required by the most impoverished nations?

View answer

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given beside.Compoundable offences are those offences where, the complainant picks up the thrown gauntlet and enters into a compromise and agrees to have the charges dropped against the accused. However, the cardinal caveat is that such a compromise ought to be visited with "bonafides" and cannot stem ought of illegal benefits to which the complainant is not entitled to. The Code vide Section 320 contemplates compounding of certain offences enumerated in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC"). Compounding of offences has legislatively been bifurcated in two broad categories i.e. compounding of offences without the permission of the Court and compounding of offences with the permission of the Court. The offences that dispense with the blessings of the Court or do not require court of law are of comparatively diminished magnitude such as offences under Sections 298,491,500,501 etc. of the IPC. The offences that require the strike of the gavel i.e court of law are offences such as Sections 325,406,420,494 etc. of the IPC. For example Grievous hurt cases require Compounding to be done by Court of Law. Where the accused is made a party to the proceedings of compounding an offence is that where the accused resides outside the jurisdiction of the Court, there is statutorily no requirement for him to incur expenses to come and appear in the compounding proceedings. The common practice of featuring the accused in the memo of parties is a dispensable step which when dispensed with not only would expedite the Court proceedings but would also be in consonance with the intention of the legislature. The effect of compounding of an offence is fundamentally a withdrawal of the charges pressed against the accused. Let us extend this analogy further, all other proceedings such as withdrawal of a suit, withdrawal of a Special Leave Petition, withdrawal of an application, do not contemplate the other party being made part of the withdrawal proceedings and the withdrawal is proceeded with simplicitor. The said practice is not only unnecessary given that the statutory scheme but is also an inconvenience to the accused who in manner of speaking "has paid all his debts". Extracted from Compounding Of Offences: Is The Accused Invited To The "Party" - Crime - India (mondaq.com).Q. What is the effect of compounding an offense?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

What was a significant outcome of the recent India-China border deal?a) Increase in direct flights between the two countriesb) Resumption of patrolling rights along the Line of Actual Controlc) Complete withdrawal of troops from the borderd) Normalization of trade relations between India and ChinaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
What was a significant outcome of the recent India-China border deal?a) Increase in direct flights between the two countriesb) Resumption of patrolling rights along the Line of Actual Controlc) Complete withdrawal of troops from the borderd) Normalization of trade relations between India and ChinaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about What was a significant outcome of the recent India-China border deal?a) Increase in direct flights between the two countriesb) Resumption of patrolling rights along the Line of Actual Controlc) Complete withdrawal of troops from the borderd) Normalization of trade relations between India and ChinaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What was a significant outcome of the recent India-China border deal?a) Increase in direct flights between the two countriesb) Resumption of patrolling rights along the Line of Actual Controlc) Complete withdrawal of troops from the borderd) Normalization of trade relations between India and ChinaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for What was a significant outcome of the recent India-China border deal?a) Increase in direct flights between the two countriesb) Resumption of patrolling rights along the Line of Actual Controlc) Complete withdrawal of troops from the borderd) Normalization of trade relations between India and ChinaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of What was a significant outcome of the recent India-China border deal?a) Increase in direct flights between the two countriesb) Resumption of patrolling rights along the Line of Actual Controlc) Complete withdrawal of troops from the borderd) Normalization of trade relations between India and ChinaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What was a significant outcome of the recent India-China border deal?a) Increase in direct flights between the two countriesb) Resumption of patrolling rights along the Line of Actual Controlc) Complete withdrawal of troops from the borderd) Normalization of trade relations between India and ChinaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What was a significant outcome of the recent India-China border deal?a) Increase in direct flights between the two countriesb) Resumption of patrolling rights along the Line of Actual Controlc) Complete withdrawal of troops from the borderd) Normalization of trade relations between India and ChinaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What was a significant outcome of the recent India-China border deal?a) Increase in direct flights between the two countriesb) Resumption of patrolling rights along the Line of Actual Controlc) Complete withdrawal of troops from the borderd) Normalization of trade relations between India and ChinaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What was a significant outcome of the recent India-China border deal?a) Increase in direct flights between the two countriesb) Resumption of patrolling rights along the Line of Actual Controlc) Complete withdrawal of troops from the borderd) Normalization of trade relations between India and ChinaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam