Which one of the following is True with respect to the date selection ...
From the book the following information is inferred that There was a time when historians were fascinated with dates. There were heated debates about the dates on which rulers were crowned or battles were fought. In the common-sense notion, history was synonymous with dates. Thus the answer is option A.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all UPSC courses
Which one of the following is True with respect to the date selection ...
Introduction:
The selection of dates by historians holds significant importance in historical research and analysis. It helps to establish chronology, understand the context, and make connections between events. However, among the given options, the true statement regarding date selection by historians is option A, which states that dates around which the story is composed are not important on their own.
Explanation:
Historians do not consider dates as isolated pieces of information; instead, they give importance to the events and narratives surrounding those dates. Here are the reasons why option A is true:
1. Contextual Significance:
Dates gain significance and meaning when connected to the larger historical context. Historians analyze the events, patterns, and circumstances surrounding a particular date to understand its significance in the broader historical narrative. They consider multiple factors like political, social, economic, and cultural contexts to interpret the importance of a particular date.
2. Causal Relationships:
Dates alone do not provide a complete understanding of historical events. Historians aim to establish causality between events and analyze the relationships between different occurrences. By examining the sequence of events and their interconnections, historians can identify the reasons for a particular event or its impact on subsequent developments.
3. Primary and Secondary Sources:
Historians rely on various primary and secondary sources to gather information about historical events. These sources provide details about the events, people involved, and the broader context. Primary sources like official records, diaries, letters, and eyewitness accounts provide direct evidence, while secondary sources like scholarly works and historical analyses offer interpretations and perspectives. By examining these sources, historians can construct a comprehensive narrative around the events, going beyond the dates themselves.
4. Debate and Interpretation:
Historians often engage in debates and discussions about the interpretation of historical events. These debates can involve conflicting perspectives on the significance of specific dates or the sequencing of events. The interpretation of historical dates can vary based on the historian's perspective, available evidence, and research methodology. Therefore, it is not uncommon for historians to discuss and debate the importance and interpretation of dates.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, while dates are an essential aspect of historical research, they gain significance when placed within the broader historical context. Historians analyze events, establish causality, rely on primary and secondary sources, and engage in debates to construct a comprehensive narrative. Therefore, the statement that dates around which the story is composed are not important on their own (option A) is true.
Which one of the following is True with respect to the date selection ...
Some one please give me a clear explanation for this.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.