Question Description
Principle – Volenti non fit injuria – One who voluntarily consents to harm, cannot seek damages.Facts – Jitesh is a tennis player with the NALSAR Tennis Association. One evening, while playing an intense match of tennis, the Vice Chancellor of the university decides to visit the tennis court to watch the match. He enters the court, seats himself at the stands and watches the progress of the match. Accidentally, he drops his watch on the court, and Jitesh steps on it while trying to hit a backhand. The watch is a Rolex, and has been shattered to pieces. Jitesh is terrified of disciplinary action that might be taken against him, and is also upset that he has broken a Rolex, endorsed by his favourite player, Federer. He approaches you for advice.a)Jitesh will not be held liable, as the principle of volenti non fit injuria would apply. The Vice Chancellor can be reasonably expected to foresee that a watch dropped on the tennis court could be stepped on during a match.b)Jitesh will be liable. He has stepped on the Vice Chancellor‘s watch, when he could have avoided it. He must pay damages.c)If Jitesh had caused injury or harm by hitting the tennis ball during the match, that can be reasonably expected. However, he stepped on it. This cannot be reasonably expected,and hence, he must be held liable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle – Volenti non fit injuria – One who voluntarily consents to harm, cannot seek damages.Facts – Jitesh is a tennis player with the NALSAR Tennis Association. One evening, while playing an intense match of tennis, the Vice Chancellor of the university decides to visit the tennis court to watch the match. He enters the court, seats himself at the stands and watches the progress of the match. Accidentally, he drops his watch on the court, and Jitesh steps on it while trying to hit a backhand. The watch is a Rolex, and has been shattered to pieces. Jitesh is terrified of disciplinary action that might be taken against him, and is also upset that he has broken a Rolex, endorsed by his favourite player, Federer. He approaches you for advice.a)Jitesh will not be held liable, as the principle of volenti non fit injuria would apply. The Vice Chancellor can be reasonably expected to foresee that a watch dropped on the tennis court could be stepped on during a match.b)Jitesh will be liable. He has stepped on the Vice Chancellor‘s watch, when he could have avoided it. He must pay damages.c)If Jitesh had caused injury or harm by hitting the tennis ball during the match, that can be reasonably expected. However, he stepped on it. This cannot be reasonably expected,and hence, he must be held liable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle – Volenti non fit injuria – One who voluntarily consents to harm, cannot seek damages.Facts – Jitesh is a tennis player with the NALSAR Tennis Association. One evening, while playing an intense match of tennis, the Vice Chancellor of the university decides to visit the tennis court to watch the match. He enters the court, seats himself at the stands and watches the progress of the match. Accidentally, he drops his watch on the court, and Jitesh steps on it while trying to hit a backhand. The watch is a Rolex, and has been shattered to pieces. Jitesh is terrified of disciplinary action that might be taken against him, and is also upset that he has broken a Rolex, endorsed by his favourite player, Federer. He approaches you for advice.a)Jitesh will not be held liable, as the principle of volenti non fit injuria would apply. The Vice Chancellor can be reasonably expected to foresee that a watch dropped on the tennis court could be stepped on during a match.b)Jitesh will be liable. He has stepped on the Vice Chancellor‘s watch, when he could have avoided it. He must pay damages.c)If Jitesh had caused injury or harm by hitting the tennis ball during the match, that can be reasonably expected. However, he stepped on it. This cannot be reasonably expected,and hence, he must be held liable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle – Volenti non fit injuria – One who voluntarily consents to harm, cannot seek damages.Facts – Jitesh is a tennis player with the NALSAR Tennis Association. One evening, while playing an intense match of tennis, the Vice Chancellor of the university decides to visit the tennis court to watch the match. He enters the court, seats himself at the stands and watches the progress of the match. Accidentally, he drops his watch on the court, and Jitesh steps on it while trying to hit a backhand. The watch is a Rolex, and has been shattered to pieces. Jitesh is terrified of disciplinary action that might be taken against him, and is also upset that he has broken a Rolex, endorsed by his favourite player, Federer. He approaches you for advice.a)Jitesh will not be held liable, as the principle of volenti non fit injuria would apply. The Vice Chancellor can be reasonably expected to foresee that a watch dropped on the tennis court could be stepped on during a match.b)Jitesh will be liable. He has stepped on the Vice Chancellor‘s watch, when he could have avoided it. He must pay damages.c)If Jitesh had caused injury or harm by hitting the tennis ball during the match, that can be reasonably expected. However, he stepped on it. This cannot be reasonably expected,and hence, he must be held liable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle – Volenti non fit injuria – One who voluntarily consents to harm, cannot seek damages.Facts – Jitesh is a tennis player with the NALSAR Tennis Association. One evening, while playing an intense match of tennis, the Vice Chancellor of the university decides to visit the tennis court to watch the match. He enters the court, seats himself at the stands and watches the progress of the match. Accidentally, he drops his watch on the court, and Jitesh steps on it while trying to hit a backhand. The watch is a Rolex, and has been shattered to pieces. Jitesh is terrified of disciplinary action that might be taken against him, and is also upset that he has broken a Rolex, endorsed by his favourite player, Federer. He approaches you for advice.a)Jitesh will not be held liable, as the principle of volenti non fit injuria would apply. The Vice Chancellor can be reasonably expected to foresee that a watch dropped on the tennis court could be stepped on during a match.b)Jitesh will be liable. He has stepped on the Vice Chancellor‘s watch, when he could have avoided it. He must pay damages.c)If Jitesh had caused injury or harm by hitting the tennis ball during the match, that can be reasonably expected. However, he stepped on it. This cannot be reasonably expected,and hence, he must be held liable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle – Volenti non fit injuria – One who voluntarily consents to harm, cannot seek damages.Facts – Jitesh is a tennis player with the NALSAR Tennis Association. One evening, while playing an intense match of tennis, the Vice Chancellor of the university decides to visit the tennis court to watch the match. He enters the court, seats himself at the stands and watches the progress of the match. Accidentally, he drops his watch on the court, and Jitesh steps on it while trying to hit a backhand. The watch is a Rolex, and has been shattered to pieces. Jitesh is terrified of disciplinary action that might be taken against him, and is also upset that he has broken a Rolex, endorsed by his favourite player, Federer. He approaches you for advice.a)Jitesh will not be held liable, as the principle of volenti non fit injuria would apply. The Vice Chancellor can be reasonably expected to foresee that a watch dropped on the tennis court could be stepped on during a match.b)Jitesh will be liable. He has stepped on the Vice Chancellor‘s watch, when he could have avoided it. He must pay damages.c)If Jitesh had caused injury or harm by hitting the tennis ball during the match, that can be reasonably expected. However, he stepped on it. This cannot be reasonably expected,and hence, he must be held liable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle – Volenti non fit injuria – One who voluntarily consents to harm, cannot seek damages.Facts – Jitesh is a tennis player with the NALSAR Tennis Association. One evening, while playing an intense match of tennis, the Vice Chancellor of the university decides to visit the tennis court to watch the match. He enters the court, seats himself at the stands and watches the progress of the match. Accidentally, he drops his watch on the court, and Jitesh steps on it while trying to hit a backhand. The watch is a Rolex, and has been shattered to pieces. Jitesh is terrified of disciplinary action that might be taken against him, and is also upset that he has broken a Rolex, endorsed by his favourite player, Federer. He approaches you for advice.a)Jitesh will not be held liable, as the principle of volenti non fit injuria would apply. The Vice Chancellor can be reasonably expected to foresee that a watch dropped on the tennis court could be stepped on during a match.b)Jitesh will be liable. He has stepped on the Vice Chancellor‘s watch, when he could have avoided it. He must pay damages.c)If Jitesh had caused injury or harm by hitting the tennis ball during the match, that can be reasonably expected. However, he stepped on it. This cannot be reasonably expected,and hence, he must be held liable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle – Volenti non fit injuria – One who voluntarily consents to harm, cannot seek damages.Facts – Jitesh is a tennis player with the NALSAR Tennis Association. One evening, while playing an intense match of tennis, the Vice Chancellor of the university decides to visit the tennis court to watch the match. He enters the court, seats himself at the stands and watches the progress of the match. Accidentally, he drops his watch on the court, and Jitesh steps on it while trying to hit a backhand. The watch is a Rolex, and has been shattered to pieces. Jitesh is terrified of disciplinary action that might be taken against him, and is also upset that he has broken a Rolex, endorsed by his favourite player, Federer. He approaches you for advice.a)Jitesh will not be held liable, as the principle of volenti non fit injuria would apply. The Vice Chancellor can be reasonably expected to foresee that a watch dropped on the tennis court could be stepped on during a match.b)Jitesh will be liable. He has stepped on the Vice Chancellor‘s watch, when he could have avoided it. He must pay damages.c)If Jitesh had caused injury or harm by hitting the tennis ball during the match, that can be reasonably expected. However, he stepped on it. This cannot be reasonably expected,and hence, he must be held liable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle – Volenti non fit injuria – One who voluntarily consents to harm, cannot seek damages.Facts – Jitesh is a tennis player with the NALSAR Tennis Association. One evening, while playing an intense match of tennis, the Vice Chancellor of the university decides to visit the tennis court to watch the match. He enters the court, seats himself at the stands and watches the progress of the match. Accidentally, he drops his watch on the court, and Jitesh steps on it while trying to hit a backhand. The watch is a Rolex, and has been shattered to pieces. Jitesh is terrified of disciplinary action that might be taken against him, and is also upset that he has broken a Rolex, endorsed by his favourite player, Federer. He approaches you for advice.a)Jitesh will not be held liable, as the principle of volenti non fit injuria would apply. The Vice Chancellor can be reasonably expected to foresee that a watch dropped on the tennis court could be stepped on during a match.b)Jitesh will be liable. He has stepped on the Vice Chancellor‘s watch, when he could have avoided it. He must pay damages.c)If Jitesh had caused injury or harm by hitting the tennis ball during the match, that can be reasonably expected. However, he stepped on it. This cannot be reasonably expected,and hence, he must be held liable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.