**Difference between Civil Disobedience Movement and Non-Cooperation Movement**

The Civil Disobedience Movement and Non-Cooperation Movement were two significant phases of India's struggle for independence against British colonial rule. While both movements aimed to challenge British authority and achieve self-rule, there are distinct differences between them.

**1. Objective:**
- The Non-Cooperation Movement, led by Mahatma Gandhi in 1920-1922, aimed to resist British rule by non-violent means, boycott British institutions, and withdraw from cooperation with the colonial administration.
- The Civil Disobedience Movement, initiated by Gandhi in 1930, sought to demand complete independence from British rule, challenge unjust laws, and involve mass participation through non-violent civil disobedience.

**2. Nature and Scope:**
- The Non-Cooperation Movement focused on non-violent non-cooperation, boycotting British products, institutions, and titles, and promoting indigenous goods and institutions.
- The Civil Disobedience Movement went a step further and involved acts of deliberate law-breaking, such as the famous Salt March, where people illegally manufactured salt as a symbol of defiance against the British salt monopoly.

**3. Goal:**
- The Non-Cooperation Movement aimed to create a sense of self-reliance, self-governance, and self-sufficiency among Indians to weaken British authority and promote the idea of Swaraj (self-rule).
- The Civil Disobedience Movement sought to achieve complete independence from British rule by challenging oppressive laws and practices, mobilizing the masses, and drawing international attention to the Indian freedom struggle.

**4. Mass Participation:**
- The Non-Cooperation Movement witnessed widespread participation from various sections of society, including students, lawyers, teachers, and peasants. It generated a sense of unity and awakened nationalist sentiments among the masses.
- The Civil Disobedience Movement expanded the mass participation even further, involving women, rural communities, and people from diverse socio-economic backgrounds. It became a truly nationwide movement, with people actively engaging in acts of civil disobedience.

**5. Government Reaction:**
- The Non-Cooperation Movement faced severe government repression, with mass arrests, violence, and the Chauri Chaura incident, where policemen were killed. Eventually, Gandhi called off the movement due to the violence.
- The Civil Disobedience Movement also faced harsh repression, with thousands of people arrested and imprisoned by the British authorities. However, it managed to garner significant international attention and forced the British government to negotiate with Indian leaders.

In summary, while both the Non-Cooperation Movement and Civil Disobedience Movement aimed to challenge British rule, the Civil Disobedience Movement took the struggle for independence to a more advanced stage by involving acts of deliberate law-breaking and demanding complete independence. The Civil Disobedience Movement also witnessed greater mass participation and international attention, making it an important milestone in India's fight for freedom.

CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE MOVEMENT :-
* people were asked to break colonial laws.
* peasant refused to pay taxes.
* M. Gandhi broke salt law.

Non COOPERATION MOVEMENT
* people were asked to refuse cooperation with British.
* They were asked to surrender titles that were awarded
* They boycott foreign cloths.