CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Ecosystems function like intricate networks, ... Start Learning for Free
Ecosystems function like intricate networks, where each organism plays a specific role, much like workers in a coordinated system. Understanding these roles and their relationships reveals the delicate balance that sustains life. Ecologists argue that analyzing these connections helps predict environmental changes and informs conservation strategies. Critics, however, caution that oversimplifying these relationships risks missing their complexity, potentially leading to flawed policies.

In a forest ecosystem, the
sun
is a power source, fueling plant growth.
Trees
act as architects, building habitats with their branches and roots stabilizing soil.
Herbivores
, like deer, are consumers, trimming vegetation to prevent overgrowth.
Predators
, such as wolves, are regulators, maintaining herbivore populations to protect plant life.
Decomposers
, like fungi, are recyclers, breaking down dead matter to replenish soil nutrients. Each role is interdependent, forming a web of relationships that ensures stability.

For example of a pond ecosystem:
Algae
serves as the power source, producing energy via photosynthesis.
Aquatic plants
are architects, providing structure and oxygen.
Fish
act as consumers, feeding on algae to control its spread.
Herons
are regulators, preying on fish to balance the system.
Bacteria
are recyclers, decomposing waste to enrich the water.

The relationships can be expressed as analogies: the sun is to trees as algae is to aquatic plants (power source to architect). Similarly, herbivores are to predators as fish are to herons (consumer to regulator). These analogies highlight functional similarities across ecosystems, aiding ecologists in comparing systems. However, critics argue that analogies may oversimplify unique interactions, such as a predator’s impact on soil health, which could lead to misinformed conservation efforts.

Consider Maya, an ecologist studying a grassland ecosystem. She identifies
grass
as the power source** and
bison
as consumers. To complete her analysis, she needs to map relationships using analogies based on the forest or pond models. For instance, what role in the grassland corresponds to wolves in the forest? Such questions test the ability to apply relational patterns while critically assessing the limits of analogical reasoning in complex systems.
In Maya’s grassland ecosystem, what role is analogous to wolves in the forest ecosystem?
  • a)
    Grass
  • b)
    Bison
  • c)
    Coyotes
  • d)
    Soil microbes
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Ecosystems function like intricate networks, where each organism plays...
Wolves are predators (regulators) in the forest, controlling herbivores. In the grassland, coyotes, as predators, regulate consumers like bison, making them the analogous role.
Free Test
Community Answer
Ecosystems function like intricate networks, where each organism plays...
Understanding Ecosystem Roles
In Maya's grassland ecosystem, identifying the role analogous to wolves in the forest is crucial for understanding the balance of relationships. Here’s how this analogy works:
Power Source and Consumers
- Grass serves as the power source, similar to how the sun fuels tree growth in forests.
- Bison act as the primary consumers, analogous to herbivores like deer which consume vegetation and maintain balance.
Regulator Role
- The role that corresponds to wolves in the forest is played by coyotes in the grassland ecosystem.
Why Coyotes are the Correct Answer
- Predatory Role: Just as wolves regulate herbivore populations (like deer), coyotes manage the populations of smaller herbivores and rodents in grasslands.
- Ecosystem Stability: Both wolves and coyotes serve to prevent overgrazing by controlling consumer numbers, ensuring that plant life can thrive and maintain ecosystem health.
Importance of Analogies
- The analogy aids ecologists in understanding the functional similarities across different ecosystems, enhancing the ability to predict the consequences of changes within each system.
- However, caution is advised as these analogies can oversimplify complex interactions and lead to misinformed conservation strategies.
In summary, coyotes in Maya’s grassland fulfill a regulatory role similar to that of wolves in the forest, highlighting the interconnectedness and balance within ecosystems.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Question Description
Ecosystems function like intricate networks, where each organism plays a specific role, much like workers in a coordinated system. Understanding these roles and their relationships reveals the delicate balance that sustains life. Ecologists argue that analyzing these connections helps predict environmental changes and informs conservation strategies. Critics, however, caution that oversimplifying these relationships risks missing their complexity, potentially leading to flawed policies.In a forest ecosystem, the sun is a power source, fueling plant growth. Trees act as architects, building habitats with their branches and roots stabilizing soil. Herbivores, like deer, are consumers, trimming vegetation to prevent overgrowth. Predators, such as wolves, are regulators, maintaining herbivore populations to protect plant life. Decomposers, like fungi, are recyclers, breaking down dead matter to replenish soil nutrients. Each role is interdependent, forming a web of relationships that ensures stability.For example of a pond ecosystem: Algae serves as the power source, producing energy via photosynthesis. Aquatic plants are architects, providing structure and oxygen. Fish act as consumers, feeding on algae to control its spread. Herons are regulators, preying on fish to balance the system. Bacteria are recyclers, decomposing waste to enrich the water.The relationships can be expressed as analogies: the sun is to trees as algae is to aquatic plants (power source to architect). Similarly, herbivores are to predators as fish are to herons (consumer to regulator). These analogies highlight functional similarities across ecosystems, aiding ecologists in comparing systems. However, critics argue that analogies may oversimplify unique interactions, such as a predator’s impact on soil health, which could lead to misinformed conservation efforts.Consider Maya, an ecologist studying a grassland ecosystem. She identifies grass as the power source** and bison as consumers. To complete her analysis, she needs to map relationships using analogies based on the forest or pond models. For instance, what role in the grassland corresponds to wolves in the forest? Such questions test the ability to apply relational patterns while critically assessing the limits of analogical reasoning in complex systems.In Maya’s grassland ecosystem, what role is analogous to wolves in the forest ecosystem?a)Grassb)Bisonc)Coyotesd)Soil microbesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Ecosystems function like intricate networks, where each organism plays a specific role, much like workers in a coordinated system. Understanding these roles and their relationships reveals the delicate balance that sustains life. Ecologists argue that analyzing these connections helps predict environmental changes and informs conservation strategies. Critics, however, caution that oversimplifying these relationships risks missing their complexity, potentially leading to flawed policies.In a forest ecosystem, the sun is a power source, fueling plant growth. Trees act as architects, building habitats with their branches and roots stabilizing soil. Herbivores, like deer, are consumers, trimming vegetation to prevent overgrowth. Predators, such as wolves, are regulators, maintaining herbivore populations to protect plant life. Decomposers, like fungi, are recyclers, breaking down dead matter to replenish soil nutrients. Each role is interdependent, forming a web of relationships that ensures stability.For example of a pond ecosystem: Algae serves as the power source, producing energy via photosynthesis. Aquatic plants are architects, providing structure and oxygen. Fish act as consumers, feeding on algae to control its spread. Herons are regulators, preying on fish to balance the system. Bacteria are recyclers, decomposing waste to enrich the water.The relationships can be expressed as analogies: the sun is to trees as algae is to aquatic plants (power source to architect). Similarly, herbivores are to predators as fish are to herons (consumer to regulator). These analogies highlight functional similarities across ecosystems, aiding ecologists in comparing systems. However, critics argue that analogies may oversimplify unique interactions, such as a predator’s impact on soil health, which could lead to misinformed conservation efforts.Consider Maya, an ecologist studying a grassland ecosystem. She identifies grass as the power source** and bison as consumers. To complete her analysis, she needs to map relationships using analogies based on the forest or pond models. For instance, what role in the grassland corresponds to wolves in the forest? Such questions test the ability to apply relational patterns while critically assessing the limits of analogical reasoning in complex systems.In Maya’s grassland ecosystem, what role is analogous to wolves in the forest ecosystem?a)Grassb)Bisonc)Coyotesd)Soil microbesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Ecosystems function like intricate networks, where each organism plays a specific role, much like workers in a coordinated system. Understanding these roles and their relationships reveals the delicate balance that sustains life. Ecologists argue that analyzing these connections helps predict environmental changes and informs conservation strategies. Critics, however, caution that oversimplifying these relationships risks missing their complexity, potentially leading to flawed policies.In a forest ecosystem, the sun is a power source, fueling plant growth. Trees act as architects, building habitats with their branches and roots stabilizing soil. Herbivores, like deer, are consumers, trimming vegetation to prevent overgrowth. Predators, such as wolves, are regulators, maintaining herbivore populations to protect plant life. Decomposers, like fungi, are recyclers, breaking down dead matter to replenish soil nutrients. Each role is interdependent, forming a web of relationships that ensures stability.For example of a pond ecosystem: Algae serves as the power source, producing energy via photosynthesis. Aquatic plants are architects, providing structure and oxygen. Fish act as consumers, feeding on algae to control its spread. Herons are regulators, preying on fish to balance the system. Bacteria are recyclers, decomposing waste to enrich the water.The relationships can be expressed as analogies: the sun is to trees as algae is to aquatic plants (power source to architect). Similarly, herbivores are to predators as fish are to herons (consumer to regulator). These analogies highlight functional similarities across ecosystems, aiding ecologists in comparing systems. However, critics argue that analogies may oversimplify unique interactions, such as a predator’s impact on soil health, which could lead to misinformed conservation efforts.Consider Maya, an ecologist studying a grassland ecosystem. She identifies grass as the power source** and bison as consumers. To complete her analysis, she needs to map relationships using analogies based on the forest or pond models. For instance, what role in the grassland corresponds to wolves in the forest? Such questions test the ability to apply relational patterns while critically assessing the limits of analogical reasoning in complex systems.In Maya’s grassland ecosystem, what role is analogous to wolves in the forest ecosystem?a)Grassb)Bisonc)Coyotesd)Soil microbesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Ecosystems function like intricate networks, where each organism plays a specific role, much like workers in a coordinated system. Understanding these roles and their relationships reveals the delicate balance that sustains life. Ecologists argue that analyzing these connections helps predict environmental changes and informs conservation strategies. Critics, however, caution that oversimplifying these relationships risks missing their complexity, potentially leading to flawed policies.In a forest ecosystem, the sun is a power source, fueling plant growth. Trees act as architects, building habitats with their branches and roots stabilizing soil. Herbivores, like deer, are consumers, trimming vegetation to prevent overgrowth. Predators, such as wolves, are regulators, maintaining herbivore populations to protect plant life. Decomposers, like fungi, are recyclers, breaking down dead matter to replenish soil nutrients. Each role is interdependent, forming a web of relationships that ensures stability.For example of a pond ecosystem: Algae serves as the power source, producing energy via photosynthesis. Aquatic plants are architects, providing structure and oxygen. Fish act as consumers, feeding on algae to control its spread. Herons are regulators, preying on fish to balance the system. Bacteria are recyclers, decomposing waste to enrich the water.The relationships can be expressed as analogies: the sun is to trees as algae is to aquatic plants (power source to architect). Similarly, herbivores are to predators as fish are to herons (consumer to regulator). These analogies highlight functional similarities across ecosystems, aiding ecologists in comparing systems. However, critics argue that analogies may oversimplify unique interactions, such as a predator’s impact on soil health, which could lead to misinformed conservation efforts.Consider Maya, an ecologist studying a grassland ecosystem. She identifies grass as the power source** and bison as consumers. To complete her analysis, she needs to map relationships using analogies based on the forest or pond models. For instance, what role in the grassland corresponds to wolves in the forest? Such questions test the ability to apply relational patterns while critically assessing the limits of analogical reasoning in complex systems.In Maya’s grassland ecosystem, what role is analogous to wolves in the forest ecosystem?a)Grassb)Bisonc)Coyotesd)Soil microbesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Ecosystems function like intricate networks, where each organism plays a specific role, much like workers in a coordinated system. Understanding these roles and their relationships reveals the delicate balance that sustains life. Ecologists argue that analyzing these connections helps predict environmental changes and informs conservation strategies. Critics, however, caution that oversimplifying these relationships risks missing their complexity, potentially leading to flawed policies.In a forest ecosystem, the sun is a power source, fueling plant growth. Trees act as architects, building habitats with their branches and roots stabilizing soil. Herbivores, like deer, are consumers, trimming vegetation to prevent overgrowth. Predators, such as wolves, are regulators, maintaining herbivore populations to protect plant life. Decomposers, like fungi, are recyclers, breaking down dead matter to replenish soil nutrients. Each role is interdependent, forming a web of relationships that ensures stability.For example of a pond ecosystem: Algae serves as the power source, producing energy via photosynthesis. Aquatic plants are architects, providing structure and oxygen. Fish act as consumers, feeding on algae to control its spread. Herons are regulators, preying on fish to balance the system. Bacteria are recyclers, decomposing waste to enrich the water.The relationships can be expressed as analogies: the sun is to trees as algae is to aquatic plants (power source to architect). Similarly, herbivores are to predators as fish are to herons (consumer to regulator). These analogies highlight functional similarities across ecosystems, aiding ecologists in comparing systems. However, critics argue that analogies may oversimplify unique interactions, such as a predator’s impact on soil health, which could lead to misinformed conservation efforts.Consider Maya, an ecologist studying a grassland ecosystem. She identifies grass as the power source** and bison as consumers. To complete her analysis, she needs to map relationships using analogies based on the forest or pond models. For instance, what role in the grassland corresponds to wolves in the forest? Such questions test the ability to apply relational patterns while critically assessing the limits of analogical reasoning in complex systems.In Maya’s grassland ecosystem, what role is analogous to wolves in the forest ecosystem?a)Grassb)Bisonc)Coyotesd)Soil microbesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Ecosystems function like intricate networks, where each organism plays a specific role, much like workers in a coordinated system. Understanding these roles and their relationships reveals the delicate balance that sustains life. Ecologists argue that analyzing these connections helps predict environmental changes and informs conservation strategies. Critics, however, caution that oversimplifying these relationships risks missing their complexity, potentially leading to flawed policies.In a forest ecosystem, the sun is a power source, fueling plant growth. Trees act as architects, building habitats with their branches and roots stabilizing soil. Herbivores, like deer, are consumers, trimming vegetation to prevent overgrowth. Predators, such as wolves, are regulators, maintaining herbivore populations to protect plant life. Decomposers, like fungi, are recyclers, breaking down dead matter to replenish soil nutrients. Each role is interdependent, forming a web of relationships that ensures stability.For example of a pond ecosystem: Algae serves as the power source, producing energy via photosynthesis. Aquatic plants are architects, providing structure and oxygen. Fish act as consumers, feeding on algae to control its spread. Herons are regulators, preying on fish to balance the system. Bacteria are recyclers, decomposing waste to enrich the water.The relationships can be expressed as analogies: the sun is to trees as algae is to aquatic plants (power source to architect). Similarly, herbivores are to predators as fish are to herons (consumer to regulator). These analogies highlight functional similarities across ecosystems, aiding ecologists in comparing systems. However, critics argue that analogies may oversimplify unique interactions, such as a predator’s impact on soil health, which could lead to misinformed conservation efforts.Consider Maya, an ecologist studying a grassland ecosystem. She identifies grass as the power source** and bison as consumers. To complete her analysis, she needs to map relationships using analogies based on the forest or pond models. For instance, what role in the grassland corresponds to wolves in the forest? Such questions test the ability to apply relational patterns while critically assessing the limits of analogical reasoning in complex systems.In Maya’s grassland ecosystem, what role is analogous to wolves in the forest ecosystem?a)Grassb)Bisonc)Coyotesd)Soil microbesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Ecosystems function like intricate networks, where each organism plays a specific role, much like workers in a coordinated system. Understanding these roles and their relationships reveals the delicate balance that sustains life. Ecologists argue that analyzing these connections helps predict environmental changes and informs conservation strategies. Critics, however, caution that oversimplifying these relationships risks missing their complexity, potentially leading to flawed policies.In a forest ecosystem, the sun is a power source, fueling plant growth. Trees act as architects, building habitats with their branches and roots stabilizing soil. Herbivores, like deer, are consumers, trimming vegetation to prevent overgrowth. Predators, such as wolves, are regulators, maintaining herbivore populations to protect plant life. Decomposers, like fungi, are recyclers, breaking down dead matter to replenish soil nutrients. Each role is interdependent, forming a web of relationships that ensures stability.For example of a pond ecosystem: Algae serves as the power source, producing energy via photosynthesis. Aquatic plants are architects, providing structure and oxygen. Fish act as consumers, feeding on algae to control its spread. Herons are regulators, preying on fish to balance the system. Bacteria are recyclers, decomposing waste to enrich the water.The relationships can be expressed as analogies: the sun is to trees as algae is to aquatic plants (power source to architect). Similarly, herbivores are to predators as fish are to herons (consumer to regulator). These analogies highlight functional similarities across ecosystems, aiding ecologists in comparing systems. However, critics argue that analogies may oversimplify unique interactions, such as a predator’s impact on soil health, which could lead to misinformed conservation efforts.Consider Maya, an ecologist studying a grassland ecosystem. She identifies grass as the power source** and bison as consumers. To complete her analysis, she needs to map relationships using analogies based on the forest or pond models. For instance, what role in the grassland corresponds to wolves in the forest? Such questions test the ability to apply relational patterns while critically assessing the limits of analogical reasoning in complex systems.In Maya’s grassland ecosystem, what role is analogous to wolves in the forest ecosystem?a)Grassb)Bisonc)Coyotesd)Soil microbesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Ecosystems function like intricate networks, where each organism plays a specific role, much like workers in a coordinated system. Understanding these roles and their relationships reveals the delicate balance that sustains life. Ecologists argue that analyzing these connections helps predict environmental changes and informs conservation strategies. Critics, however, caution that oversimplifying these relationships risks missing their complexity, potentially leading to flawed policies.In a forest ecosystem, the sun is a power source, fueling plant growth. Trees act as architects, building habitats with their branches and roots stabilizing soil. Herbivores, like deer, are consumers, trimming vegetation to prevent overgrowth. Predators, such as wolves, are regulators, maintaining herbivore populations to protect plant life. Decomposers, like fungi, are recyclers, breaking down dead matter to replenish soil nutrients. Each role is interdependent, forming a web of relationships that ensures stability.For example of a pond ecosystem: Algae serves as the power source, producing energy via photosynthesis. Aquatic plants are architects, providing structure and oxygen. Fish act as consumers, feeding on algae to control its spread. Herons are regulators, preying on fish to balance the system. Bacteria are recyclers, decomposing waste to enrich the water.The relationships can be expressed as analogies: the sun is to trees as algae is to aquatic plants (power source to architect). Similarly, herbivores are to predators as fish are to herons (consumer to regulator). These analogies highlight functional similarities across ecosystems, aiding ecologists in comparing systems. However, critics argue that analogies may oversimplify unique interactions, such as a predator’s impact on soil health, which could lead to misinformed conservation efforts.Consider Maya, an ecologist studying a grassland ecosystem. She identifies grass as the power source** and bison as consumers. To complete her analysis, she needs to map relationships using analogies based on the forest or pond models. For instance, what role in the grassland corresponds to wolves in the forest? Such questions test the ability to apply relational patterns while critically assessing the limits of analogical reasoning in complex systems.In Maya’s grassland ecosystem, what role is analogous to wolves in the forest ecosystem?a)Grassb)Bisonc)Coyotesd)Soil microbesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Ecosystems function like intricate networks, where each organism plays a specific role, much like workers in a coordinated system. Understanding these roles and their relationships reveals the delicate balance that sustains life. Ecologists argue that analyzing these connections helps predict environmental changes and informs conservation strategies. Critics, however, caution that oversimplifying these relationships risks missing their complexity, potentially leading to flawed policies.In a forest ecosystem, the sun is a power source, fueling plant growth. Trees act as architects, building habitats with their branches and roots stabilizing soil. Herbivores, like deer, are consumers, trimming vegetation to prevent overgrowth. Predators, such as wolves, are regulators, maintaining herbivore populations to protect plant life. Decomposers, like fungi, are recyclers, breaking down dead matter to replenish soil nutrients. Each role is interdependent, forming a web of relationships that ensures stability.For example of a pond ecosystem: Algae serves as the power source, producing energy via photosynthesis. Aquatic plants are architects, providing structure and oxygen. Fish act as consumers, feeding on algae to control its spread. Herons are regulators, preying on fish to balance the system. Bacteria are recyclers, decomposing waste to enrich the water.The relationships can be expressed as analogies: the sun is to trees as algae is to aquatic plants (power source to architect). Similarly, herbivores are to predators as fish are to herons (consumer to regulator). These analogies highlight functional similarities across ecosystems, aiding ecologists in comparing systems. However, critics argue that analogies may oversimplify unique interactions, such as a predator’s impact on soil health, which could lead to misinformed conservation efforts.Consider Maya, an ecologist studying a grassland ecosystem. She identifies grass as the power source** and bison as consumers. To complete her analysis, she needs to map relationships using analogies based on the forest or pond models. For instance, what role in the grassland corresponds to wolves in the forest? Such questions test the ability to apply relational patterns while critically assessing the limits of analogical reasoning in complex systems.In Maya’s grassland ecosystem, what role is analogous to wolves in the forest ecosystem?a)Grassb)Bisonc)Coyotesd)Soil microbesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev