CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Directions: In making a decision about an imp... Start Learning for Free
Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement: Should gambling be made legal in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes, Government can earn huge amount of money by imposing tax on the amount involved in gambling as people otherwise gamble illegally.
II. No, some individuals might misuse their earnings on gambling if it’s legalized, which could cause issues for them and their families.
  • a)
    if both arguments I and II are strong
  • b)
    if only argument II is strong.
  • c)
    if either argument I or II is strong.
  • d)
    if neither argument I nor II is strong.
  • e)
    if only argument I is strong 
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is de...
Argument I: Yes, the Government can earn a huge amount of money by imposing tax on the amount involved in gambling as people otherwise gamble illegally.
  • Analysis: This argument highlights the potential financial benefit to the government through taxation on legal gambling. It suggests that legalization could help control the gambling industry, prevent illegal activities, and provide a source of revenue. This is a strong argument because it directly addresses a potential advantage of legalization that could benefit public funds and improve regulation.
Argument II: No, some individuals might misuse their earnings on gambling if it’s legalized, which could cause issues for them and their families.
  • Analysis: This argument raises a valid concern about the potential negative impact of gambling on individuals and families, including financial strain and addiction. However, it does not directly address the overall feasibility or regulation of gambling but instead highlights a possible misuse of legalization. While relevant, this argument is relatively weaker because it focuses on individual behavior rather than the larger impact on society or the feasibility of controlled legalization.
Conclusion: Argument I is strong, as it addresses a significant economic benefit and regulatory advantage. Argument II, while raising a valid concern, is less directly related to the question’s broader implications.
Answer: E (if only argument I is strong).
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Question Description
Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should gambling be made legal in India?Arguments:I. Yes, Government can earn huge amount of money by imposing tax on the amount involved in gambling as people otherwise gamble illegally.II.No, some individuals might misuse their earnings on gambling if it’s legalized, which could cause issues for them and their families.a)if both arguments I and II are strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if only argument I is strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should gambling be made legal in India?Arguments:I. Yes, Government can earn huge amount of money by imposing tax on the amount involved in gambling as people otherwise gamble illegally.II.No, some individuals might misuse their earnings on gambling if it’s legalized, which could cause issues for them and their families.a)if both arguments I and II are strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if only argument I is strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should gambling be made legal in India?Arguments:I. Yes, Government can earn huge amount of money by imposing tax on the amount involved in gambling as people otherwise gamble illegally.II.No, some individuals might misuse their earnings on gambling if it’s legalized, which could cause issues for them and their families.a)if both arguments I and II are strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if only argument I is strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should gambling be made legal in India?Arguments:I. Yes, Government can earn huge amount of money by imposing tax on the amount involved in gambling as people otherwise gamble illegally.II.No, some individuals might misuse their earnings on gambling if it’s legalized, which could cause issues for them and their families.a)if both arguments I and II are strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if only argument I is strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should gambling be made legal in India?Arguments:I. Yes, Government can earn huge amount of money by imposing tax on the amount involved in gambling as people otherwise gamble illegally.II.No, some individuals might misuse their earnings on gambling if it’s legalized, which could cause issues for them and their families.a)if both arguments I and II are strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if only argument I is strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should gambling be made legal in India?Arguments:I. Yes, Government can earn huge amount of money by imposing tax on the amount involved in gambling as people otherwise gamble illegally.II.No, some individuals might misuse their earnings on gambling if it’s legalized, which could cause issues for them and their families.a)if both arguments I and II are strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if only argument I is strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should gambling be made legal in India?Arguments:I. Yes, Government can earn huge amount of money by imposing tax on the amount involved in gambling as people otherwise gamble illegally.II.No, some individuals might misuse their earnings on gambling if it’s legalized, which could cause issues for them and their families.a)if both arguments I and II are strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if only argument I is strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should gambling be made legal in India?Arguments:I. Yes, Government can earn huge amount of money by imposing tax on the amount involved in gambling as people otherwise gamble illegally.II.No, some individuals might misuse their earnings on gambling if it’s legalized, which could cause issues for them and their families.a)if both arguments I and II are strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if only argument I is strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should gambling be made legal in India?Arguments:I. Yes, Government can earn huge amount of money by imposing tax on the amount involved in gambling as people otherwise gamble illegally.II.No, some individuals might misuse their earnings on gambling if it’s legalized, which could cause issues for them and their families.a)if both arguments I and II are strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if only argument I is strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev