CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Principle 1 – Whosoever causes the deat... Start Learning for Free
Principle 1 – Whosoever causes the death of anyperson by a rash or negligent act is liable to bepunished for culpable homicide.
Principle 2 – Negligence refers to the gross andculpable neglect or failure to exercise reasonable careand caution against harm to either the general publicor to a particular individual.
Facts – Aayush is driving back home from a busy dayat work. He stops by at a grocery store to buy milk,eggs and strawberries. The street is a busy one, andAayush leaves his car with the engine running,thinking that he would be able to return with thegrocery in no time at all. While he was in the store,some curious children happen to notice that the car isunlocked and the engine is running. They release thehandbrake while playing in the car. The car crashesinto a person who was nearby, who sustains a serioushead injury and subsequently dies.
Ques Can Aayush be held liable for culpablehomicide?
  • a)
    No, Aayush cannot be held liable, as there isno guilty intent on his part, to kill the personstanding nearby.
  • b)
    No, Aayush has no committed any act tocause the person’s death. It is the childrenwho released the handbrake who must beheld liable.
  • c)
    Yes, Aayush can be held liable. He has beengrossly negligent by leaving the car with theengine running on a busy street.
  • d)
    None of the above.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Principle 1 – Whosoever causes the death of anyperson by a rash ...
Aayush had left the car unattended with the engine running, despite the fact that the street was a busy one. He has been grossly negligent, and has not taken reasonable care and precaution by at least turning the engine off. Hence, he will be held liable. 
 
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle 1 – Whosoever causes the death of anyperson by a rash ...
Aayush had left the car unattended with the engine running, despite the fact that the street was a busy one. He has been grossly negligent, and has not taken reasonable care and precaution by at least turning the engine off. Hence, he will be held liable. 
 
Free Test
Community Answer
Principle 1 – Whosoever causes the death of anyperson by a rash ...
Aayush can be held liable because he could exercise reasonable care by not leaving his car running so this is a negligent act (according to principle 2) causing a person 's death thus according to principle 1 this negligent act
is liable to be punished for cupable homicide.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Question Description
Principle 1 – Whosoever causes the death of anyperson by a rash or negligent act is liable to bepunished for culpable homicide.Principle 2 – Negligence refers to the gross andculpable neglect or failure to exercise reasonable careand caution against harm to either the general publicor to a particular individual.Facts – Aayush is driving back home from a busy dayat work. He stops by at a grocery store to buy milk,eggs and strawberries. The street is a busy one, andAayush leaves his car with the engine running,thinking that he would be able to return with thegrocery in no time at all. While he was in the store,some curious children happen to notice that the car isunlocked and the engine is running. They release thehandbrake while playing in the car. The car crashesinto a person who was nearby, who sustains a serioushead injury and subsequently dies.Ques Can Aayush be held liable for culpablehomicide?a)No, Aayush cannot be held liable, as there isno guilty intent on his part, to kill the personstanding nearby.b)No, Aayush has no committed any act tocause the person’s death. It is the childrenwho released the handbrake who must beheld liable.c)Yes, Aayush can be held liable. He has beengrossly negligent by leaving the car with theengine running on a busy street.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle 1 – Whosoever causes the death of anyperson by a rash or negligent act is liable to bepunished for culpable homicide.Principle 2 – Negligence refers to the gross andculpable neglect or failure to exercise reasonable careand caution against harm to either the general publicor to a particular individual.Facts – Aayush is driving back home from a busy dayat work. He stops by at a grocery store to buy milk,eggs and strawberries. The street is a busy one, andAayush leaves his car with the engine running,thinking that he would be able to return with thegrocery in no time at all. While he was in the store,some curious children happen to notice that the car isunlocked and the engine is running. They release thehandbrake while playing in the car. The car crashesinto a person who was nearby, who sustains a serioushead injury and subsequently dies.Ques Can Aayush be held liable for culpablehomicide?a)No, Aayush cannot be held liable, as there isno guilty intent on his part, to kill the personstanding nearby.b)No, Aayush has no committed any act tocause the person’s death. It is the childrenwho released the handbrake who must beheld liable.c)Yes, Aayush can be held liable. He has beengrossly negligent by leaving the car with theengine running on a busy street.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle 1 – Whosoever causes the death of anyperson by a rash or negligent act is liable to bepunished for culpable homicide.Principle 2 – Negligence refers to the gross andculpable neglect or failure to exercise reasonable careand caution against harm to either the general publicor to a particular individual.Facts – Aayush is driving back home from a busy dayat work. He stops by at a grocery store to buy milk,eggs and strawberries. The street is a busy one, andAayush leaves his car with the engine running,thinking that he would be able to return with thegrocery in no time at all. While he was in the store,some curious children happen to notice that the car isunlocked and the engine is running. They release thehandbrake while playing in the car. The car crashesinto a person who was nearby, who sustains a serioushead injury and subsequently dies.Ques Can Aayush be held liable for culpablehomicide?a)No, Aayush cannot be held liable, as there isno guilty intent on his part, to kill the personstanding nearby.b)No, Aayush has no committed any act tocause the person’s death. It is the childrenwho released the handbrake who must beheld liable.c)Yes, Aayush can be held liable. He has beengrossly negligent by leaving the car with theengine running on a busy street.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle 1 – Whosoever causes the death of anyperson by a rash or negligent act is liable to bepunished for culpable homicide.Principle 2 – Negligence refers to the gross andculpable neglect or failure to exercise reasonable careand caution against harm to either the general publicor to a particular individual.Facts – Aayush is driving back home from a busy dayat work. He stops by at a grocery store to buy milk,eggs and strawberries. The street is a busy one, andAayush leaves his car with the engine running,thinking that he would be able to return with thegrocery in no time at all. While he was in the store,some curious children happen to notice that the car isunlocked and the engine is running. They release thehandbrake while playing in the car. The car crashesinto a person who was nearby, who sustains a serioushead injury and subsequently dies.Ques Can Aayush be held liable for culpablehomicide?a)No, Aayush cannot be held liable, as there isno guilty intent on his part, to kill the personstanding nearby.b)No, Aayush has no committed any act tocause the person’s death. It is the childrenwho released the handbrake who must beheld liable.c)Yes, Aayush can be held liable. He has beengrossly negligent by leaving the car with theengine running on a busy street.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle 1 – Whosoever causes the death of anyperson by a rash or negligent act is liable to bepunished for culpable homicide.Principle 2 – Negligence refers to the gross andculpable neglect or failure to exercise reasonable careand caution against harm to either the general publicor to a particular individual.Facts – Aayush is driving back home from a busy dayat work. He stops by at a grocery store to buy milk,eggs and strawberries. The street is a busy one, andAayush leaves his car with the engine running,thinking that he would be able to return with thegrocery in no time at all. While he was in the store,some curious children happen to notice that the car isunlocked and the engine is running. They release thehandbrake while playing in the car. The car crashesinto a person who was nearby, who sustains a serioushead injury and subsequently dies.Ques Can Aayush be held liable for culpablehomicide?a)No, Aayush cannot be held liable, as there isno guilty intent on his part, to kill the personstanding nearby.b)No, Aayush has no committed any act tocause the person’s death. It is the childrenwho released the handbrake who must beheld liable.c)Yes, Aayush can be held liable. He has beengrossly negligent by leaving the car with theengine running on a busy street.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle 1 – Whosoever causes the death of anyperson by a rash or negligent act is liable to bepunished for culpable homicide.Principle 2 – Negligence refers to the gross andculpable neglect or failure to exercise reasonable careand caution against harm to either the general publicor to a particular individual.Facts – Aayush is driving back home from a busy dayat work. He stops by at a grocery store to buy milk,eggs and strawberries. The street is a busy one, andAayush leaves his car with the engine running,thinking that he would be able to return with thegrocery in no time at all. While he was in the store,some curious children happen to notice that the car isunlocked and the engine is running. They release thehandbrake while playing in the car. The car crashesinto a person who was nearby, who sustains a serioushead injury and subsequently dies.Ques Can Aayush be held liable for culpablehomicide?a)No, Aayush cannot be held liable, as there isno guilty intent on his part, to kill the personstanding nearby.b)No, Aayush has no committed any act tocause the person’s death. It is the childrenwho released the handbrake who must beheld liable.c)Yes, Aayush can be held liable. He has beengrossly negligent by leaving the car with theengine running on a busy street.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle 1 – Whosoever causes the death of anyperson by a rash or negligent act is liable to bepunished for culpable homicide.Principle 2 – Negligence refers to the gross andculpable neglect or failure to exercise reasonable careand caution against harm to either the general publicor to a particular individual.Facts – Aayush is driving back home from a busy dayat work. He stops by at a grocery store to buy milk,eggs and strawberries. The street is a busy one, andAayush leaves his car with the engine running,thinking that he would be able to return with thegrocery in no time at all. While he was in the store,some curious children happen to notice that the car isunlocked and the engine is running. They release thehandbrake while playing in the car. The car crashesinto a person who was nearby, who sustains a serioushead injury and subsequently dies.Ques Can Aayush be held liable for culpablehomicide?a)No, Aayush cannot be held liable, as there isno guilty intent on his part, to kill the personstanding nearby.b)No, Aayush has no committed any act tocause the person’s death. It is the childrenwho released the handbrake who must beheld liable.c)Yes, Aayush can be held liable. He has beengrossly negligent by leaving the car with theengine running on a busy street.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle 1 – Whosoever causes the death of anyperson by a rash or negligent act is liable to bepunished for culpable homicide.Principle 2 – Negligence refers to the gross andculpable neglect or failure to exercise reasonable careand caution against harm to either the general publicor to a particular individual.Facts – Aayush is driving back home from a busy dayat work. He stops by at a grocery store to buy milk,eggs and strawberries. The street is a busy one, andAayush leaves his car with the engine running,thinking that he would be able to return with thegrocery in no time at all. While he was in the store,some curious children happen to notice that the car isunlocked and the engine is running. They release thehandbrake while playing in the car. The car crashesinto a person who was nearby, who sustains a serioushead injury and subsequently dies.Ques Can Aayush be held liable for culpablehomicide?a)No, Aayush cannot be held liable, as there isno guilty intent on his part, to kill the personstanding nearby.b)No, Aayush has no committed any act tocause the person’s death. It is the childrenwho released the handbrake who must beheld liable.c)Yes, Aayush can be held liable. He has beengrossly negligent by leaving the car with theengine running on a busy street.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle 1 – Whosoever causes the death of anyperson by a rash or negligent act is liable to bepunished for culpable homicide.Principle 2 – Negligence refers to the gross andculpable neglect or failure to exercise reasonable careand caution against harm to either the general publicor to a particular individual.Facts – Aayush is driving back home from a busy dayat work. He stops by at a grocery store to buy milk,eggs and strawberries. The street is a busy one, andAayush leaves his car with the engine running,thinking that he would be able to return with thegrocery in no time at all. While he was in the store,some curious children happen to notice that the car isunlocked and the engine is running. They release thehandbrake while playing in the car. The car crashesinto a person who was nearby, who sustains a serioushead injury and subsequently dies.Ques Can Aayush be held liable for culpablehomicide?a)No, Aayush cannot be held liable, as there isno guilty intent on his part, to kill the personstanding nearby.b)No, Aayush has no committed any act tocause the person’s death. It is the childrenwho released the handbrake who must beheld liable.c)Yes, Aayush can be held liable. He has beengrossly negligent by leaving the car with theengine running on a busy street.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev