All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  X went Y's house and forgot his bag which con... Start Learning for Free
X went Y's house and forgot his bag which contained 1kg sweets.Y's children consumed the sweets. Decide the liability of Y? (a) Y is bound to pay the price of sweets to X. (b) Y is not bound to pay anything. (c) Y is bound to pay half the price of sweets. (d) Y would not have to pay anything because X loves Y's children. ?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
X went Y's house and forgot his bag which contained 1kg sweets.Y's chi...
Liability of Y in the Situation

Scenario: X forgot his bag at Y's house, which contained 1kg of sweets, and Y's children consumed the sweets.
  • Legal Responsibility: In this scenario, the liability of Y can be analyzed based on legal principles.
  • Duty of Care: As the sweets were consumed by Y's children, it is important to consider whether Y had a duty of care towards X's belongings.
  • Reasonable Care: Generally, individuals are expected to take reasonable care of the belongings of others that are in their possession.
  • No Negligence: If Y did not intentionally or negligently allow the children to consume the sweets, it may be argued that Y should not be held liable.
  • Relationship between X and Y: The relationship between X and Y can also be a factor in determining liability.



Evaluation of Options:
  • (a) Y is bound to pay the price of sweets to X: This option may be applicable if Y failed to fulfill the duty of care and was negligent in the situation.
  • (b) Y is not bound to pay anything: If Y took reasonable care and did not act negligently, this option may be appropriate.
  • (c) Y is bound to pay half the price of sweets: This option could be considered if there was shared responsibility in the situation.
  • (d) Y would not have to pay anything because X loves Y's children: Emotional factors should generally not influence legal liability, so this option may not be legally justified.


In conclusion, the liability of Y in this situation would depend on factors such as duty of care, negligence, and the specific circumstances of the incident. It is important to carefully evaluate these aspects before determining Y's responsibility in relation to the consumed sweets.
Community Answer
X went Y's house and forgot his bag which contained 1kg sweets.Y's chi...
Due to the ambiguous nature of question and no legal principle, two options have the equal opportunity to be right, option A and B. But the CLAT committee has marked only option B as correct.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

The Parliament passed the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which promises to strengthen the rights of consumers and provides a mechanism for redressal of complaints regarding defects in goods and deficiency in services.Union Food and Consumer Affairs Minister stressed that the overall purpose of the legislation was to ease the process of addressing grievances of consumers.TheAct also seeks to bring in e-commerce under their jurisdiction and hold celebrities accountable for false and misleading advertisements of products that they endorse.The Act proposed strict action against the advertiser in case of misleading advertisements but not against the media through which the advertisement is being publicised. It also provides for product liability action on account of harm caused to consumers due to defective products or deficient services.Product liability means the liability of a product manufacturer, service provider or seller to compensate a consumer for any harm or injury caused by a defective good or deficient service.Under the Act, a consumer is defined as a person who buys any good or avails a service for a consideration.It does not include a person who obtains a good for resale or a good or service for commercial purpose. It covers transactions through all modes including offline, and online through electronic means, teleshopping, multilevel marketing or direct selling. Only a consumer can bring an action under the Act. Certain consumer rights have been defined in the Act, including the right to: (i) be protected against marketing of goods and services which are hazardous to life and property; (ii) be informed of the quality, quantity, potency, purity, standard and price of goods or services; (iii) be assured of access to a variety of goods or services at competitive prices; and (iv) seek redressal against unfair or restrictive trade practices.The central government will set up a Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCP

The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The 2019 Act has brought in some major changes and provides for more protection to the consumers in pari materia to the earlier 1986 Act which can be seen from the comprehensive definition provided for the terms consumer and unfair trade practice. The 2019 Act expands the scope of the definition of consumer so as to include the consumers involved in online transactions and it now squarely covers the e-commerce businesses within its ambit. The 2019 Act has also widened the definition of unfair trade practices as compared to the 1986 Act which now includes within its ambit online misleading advertisements; the practice of not issuing bill/memo for the goods and services; failing to take back defective goods or deactivate defective services and refund the amount within the stipulated time mentioned in the bill or memo or within 30 days in the absence of such stipulation; and disclosing personal information of a consumer unless such disclosure is in accordance with law.The 2019 Act has also introduced the concept of unfair contract which includes those contracts which favour the manufacturers or service providers and are against the interest of the consumers such as contracts requiring manifestly excessive security deposits to be given by a consumer for the performance of contractual obligations; imposing any penalty on the consumer for a breach of the contract, which is wholly disproportionate to the loss occurred due to such breach to the other party to the contract. Such unfair consumer contracts are now covered under the 2019 Act and a complaint in this regard can now be filed by a consumer.Another major introduction in the 2019 Act is the concept of product liability which covers within its ambit the product manufacturer, product service provider and product seller, for any claim for compensation. The term product liability is defined by the 2019 Act as the responsibility of a product manufacturer or product seller, of any product or service, related to the product to compensate for any harm caused to a consumer by such defective product manufactured or sold or by deficiency in services relating to the product. Also, the product seller has now been defined to include a person who is involved in placing the product for a commercial purpose and as such would include e-commerce platforms as well. Therefore, the ground commonly taken by e-commerce websites that they merely act as platforms or aggregators will now not be tenable before the court anymore. There are increased liability risks for manufacturers as compared to product service providers and product sellers, considering that under the 2019 Act, manufacturers will be liable in product liability action even where they successfully prove that they were not negligent or fraudulent in making the express warranty of a product. However, certain exceptions have been provided under the 2019 Act from liability claims, such as, that the product seller will not be liable where the product has been misused, altered or modified.Q.Stinga, a yogurt company, advertises its online product claiming that it boosts immunity and keeps the person healthy as it contains a special kind of bacteria. Zia filed a case against Stinga that it has misled the consumers.

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

X went Y's house and forgot his bag which contained 1kg sweets.Y's children consumed the sweets. Decide the liability of Y? (a) Y is bound to pay the price of sweets to X. (b) Y is not bound to pay anything. (c) Y is bound to pay half the price of sweets. (d) Y would not have to pay anything because X loves Y's children. ?
Question Description
X went Y's house and forgot his bag which contained 1kg sweets.Y's children consumed the sweets. Decide the liability of Y? (a) Y is bound to pay the price of sweets to X. (b) Y is not bound to pay anything. (c) Y is bound to pay half the price of sweets. (d) Y would not have to pay anything because X loves Y's children. ? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about X went Y's house and forgot his bag which contained 1kg sweets.Y's children consumed the sweets. Decide the liability of Y? (a) Y is bound to pay the price of sweets to X. (b) Y is not bound to pay anything. (c) Y is bound to pay half the price of sweets. (d) Y would not have to pay anything because X loves Y's children. ? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for X went Y's house and forgot his bag which contained 1kg sweets.Y's children consumed the sweets. Decide the liability of Y? (a) Y is bound to pay the price of sweets to X. (b) Y is not bound to pay anything. (c) Y is bound to pay half the price of sweets. (d) Y would not have to pay anything because X loves Y's children. ?.
Solutions for X went Y's house and forgot his bag which contained 1kg sweets.Y's children consumed the sweets. Decide the liability of Y? (a) Y is bound to pay the price of sweets to X. (b) Y is not bound to pay anything. (c) Y is bound to pay half the price of sweets. (d) Y would not have to pay anything because X loves Y's children. ? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of X went Y's house and forgot his bag which contained 1kg sweets.Y's children consumed the sweets. Decide the liability of Y? (a) Y is bound to pay the price of sweets to X. (b) Y is not bound to pay anything. (c) Y is bound to pay half the price of sweets. (d) Y would not have to pay anything because X loves Y's children. ? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of X went Y's house and forgot his bag which contained 1kg sweets.Y's children consumed the sweets. Decide the liability of Y? (a) Y is bound to pay the price of sweets to X. (b) Y is not bound to pay anything. (c) Y is bound to pay half the price of sweets. (d) Y would not have to pay anything because X loves Y's children. ?, a detailed solution for X went Y's house and forgot his bag which contained 1kg sweets.Y's children consumed the sweets. Decide the liability of Y? (a) Y is bound to pay the price of sweets to X. (b) Y is not bound to pay anything. (c) Y is bound to pay half the price of sweets. (d) Y would not have to pay anything because X loves Y's children. ? has been provided alongside types of X went Y's house and forgot his bag which contained 1kg sweets.Y's children consumed the sweets. Decide the liability of Y? (a) Y is bound to pay the price of sweets to X. (b) Y is not bound to pay anything. (c) Y is bound to pay half the price of sweets. (d) Y would not have to pay anything because X loves Y's children. ? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice X went Y's house and forgot his bag which contained 1kg sweets.Y's children consumed the sweets. Decide the liability of Y? (a) Y is bound to pay the price of sweets to X. (b) Y is not bound to pay anything. (c) Y is bound to pay half the price of sweets. (d) Y would not have to pay anything because X loves Y's children. ? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup