Explain the system of “subsidiary alliance”.

Question

Accepted Answer

Under the system of 'subsidiary alliance'-

(i)Indian rulers were not allowed to have their independent armed forces.

(ii)They were to be protected by the Company, but had to pay for the 'subsidiary forces' that the Company was supposed to maintain for the purpose of this protection.

(iii)If the Indian rulers failed to make the payment, the part of their territory was taken away as penalty.

The states which had to lose their territories on this ground were Awadh and Hyderabad.

Answer

According to this alliance, Indian rulers were not allowed to have their independent armed forces.The company army was to protect the Indian state but the ruler had to pay for the'subsidiary forces'.If an Indian ruler failed to make the payment,then part of his territory was taken away as penalty.For example-Awadh and Hydrabad were forced to cede territories on this ground.

Answer

According to the agreement the britishers took his army out of indian resistant who maintains bears out of Indians rulars and also promised to took care of Indians rulers in war but slowly and gradually they started interffering into their policies and also killing their rulers.

Answer

The System of Subsidiary Alliance

The subsidiary alliance was a system introduced by Lord Wellesley, the Governor-General of India from 1798 to 1805, as a means to expand British influence and control over the princely states of India. This system aimed to maintain the British supremacy and indirectly rule over the Indian states without direct annexation.

Background:
Before the introduction of the subsidiary alliance system, the British East India Company had already established its control over major parts of India. However, there were several independent princely states that still retained their autonomy. Lord Wellesley devised the subsidiary alliance to bring these states under the influence of the British Empire.

Key Features:
The subsidiary alliance system had several key features, including:

1. Military Protection: The princely state entering into a subsidiary alliance would receive military protection from the British. The British would station their troops in the state, ensuring its security against external threats.

2. British Control: The British had significant control over the internal affairs of the princely state. The ruler had to accept a British resident, who would act as an advisor and monitor the state's administration.

3. Financial Obligations: The princely state had to bear the cost of maintaining the British troops stationed in its territory. This placed a heavy financial burden on the state, often leading to economic instability.

4. Non-Intervention Policy: The princely state was not allowed to enter into any political or military alliances with other states without the consent of the British. This ensured that the British maintained their dominant position and prevented any potential threats to their control.

5. Treaty Obligations: The princely state had to sign a formal treaty with the British, outlining the terms and conditions of the subsidiary alliance. Failure to comply with the terms would result in severe consequences, including potential annexation.

Impact:
The subsidiary alliance system had a profound impact on the princely states of India:

1. Loss of Autonomy: The states became dependent on the British for their security, administration, and even financial stability. The rulers lost their independence and became puppets of the British Empire.

2. Financial Strain: The financial burden of maintaining the British troops and meeting other treaty obligations put a strain on the resources of the princely states, often leading to economic instability.

3. Consolidation of British Power: The subsidiary alliance system played a crucial role in consolidating British power in India. It allowed the British to indirectly control a large number of states and expand their influence without direct annexation.

4. Resistance and Rebellion: The imposition of the subsidiary alliance system led to resentment among the rulers and people of the princely states. This discontent often resulted in uprisings and rebellions against British rule.

In conclusion, the subsidiary alliance system was a strategic move by the British to exert control over the princely states of India. It ensured British dominance, weakened the autonomy of the states, and played a significant role in the consolidation of British power in the subcontinent.

Answer

Subsidiary alliance was
inciated by lord wellesly who was governor general from 1798-1805. according to this indian ruler were not allowed to have their independent arm forces .They were to be protected by the conpany's forces which was maintaibed by them.If indian rulerfai l to pay payment then a part of his territory was takebn away as penality.

Answer

Subsidiary alliance was a pact between indian ruler and east India company

Similar Class 8 Doubts

What were the system of subsidiary alliance ? Explain in short?

explain the system of "subsidiary alliance"

Explain the system of " subsidiary alliance ".?

Explain the system of “subsidiary alliance ”.?

What is subsidiary alliance?

Top Courses for Class 8View all

Science Class 8

Mathematics (Maths) Class 8

Social Studies (SST) Class 8

English Class 8

Improve Your Calculations: Vedic Maths (English)

Top Courses for Class 8

Top Courses for Class 8

Suggested Free Tests

Related Content

Class 8 Study Material

Class 8 Subjects

Competitive Examinations for Class 8

NCERT Solutions

Reference Books for Class 8

Other Popular Exams

Company