he had not the shade of idea for writing ghost story but that as had happen in the past he would find some plot to write a new ghost story.and some how he would dig up something new.

Introduction:

The statement "I did not specialize in ghost stories, but more or less, they seemed to specialize me" is an ironic one. Irony is a literary device used to convey a meaning that is opposite to what is actually being said. In this statement, there is an underlying irony that highlights the unexpected outcome of the narrator's experience with ghost stories.

Explanation:

1. Lack of specialization:
The narrator begins by stating that they did not specialize in ghost stories. This implies that they did not have any particular expertise or interest in this genre of storytelling. It suggests that they were not actively seeking to engage with or become knowledgeable about ghost stories.

2. Being specialized by ghost stories:
However, the irony lies in the second part of the statement, where the narrator expresses that ghost stories seemed to specialize them. This suggests that despite their lack of interest or intention, they found themselves becoming more involved and absorbed in the world of ghost stories. The irony lies in the fact that something they did not actively pursue ended up having a significant impact on their life.

3. Unexpected outcome:
The usage of the word "specialize" in this context is ironic because it usually implies a deliberate choice or focus. However, in this case, the narrator feels as though they have been specialized by ghost stories without their conscious effort. It highlights the unexpected and unintended consequences of their exposure to ghost stories.

4. Influence on the narrator:
The statement suggests that the narrator's experience with ghost stories has had a profound effect on them. It implies that they have gained knowledge, insight, or perhaps even a fascination with the subject matter. The irony lies in the fact that their lack of specialization in ghost stories has led to an unintended specialization or expertise in this field.

Conclusion:

The irony in the statement "I did not specialize in ghost stories, but more or less, they seemed to specialize me" lies in the unexpected outcome and influence of ghost stories on the narrator. Despite their initial disinterest or lack of expertise, the narrator finds themselves becoming specialized in ghost stories, indicating the unforeseen impact of this genre on their life.