CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > The Railway authorities allowed a train to be...
Start Learning for Free
The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger, Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose appropriate answer-
- a)Mr. X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered.
- b)Mr. X cannot sue because he had given his consent to travel in over-crowded train.
- c)Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give to a cause of action.
- d)None of the above.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequ...
Answer: CExplanation:- Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give rise to a cause of action. - The railway authorities may be responsible for allowing the train to be overcrowded, but the act of pocket-picking was committed by a third party, not the railway authorities. - There is no legal duty on the part of the railway authorities to prevent or guarantee against pickpocketing, as it is an unforeseen criminal act. - Mr. X's consent to travel in an overcrowded train does not come into play in this situation, as the issue at hand is the pickpocketing incident.In conclusion, while it is unfortunate that Mr. X had his pocket picked, he cannot sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered as there was no infringement of a legal right by the railway authorities in this case.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequ...
Mr. X's Legal Position in the Case
In this scenario, Mr. X, a legitimate passenger, had his pocket picked while traveling in an over-crowded train. The question is whether he can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered. The correct answer is option 'C,' which states that Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of a legal right, and the mere fact that the loss was caused does not give rise to a cause of action. Let's explore the reasoning behind this answer in detail.
No Infringement of Legal Right
It is important to note that for a person to have a valid cause of action, there must be an infringement of a legal right. In this case, Mr. X's pocket was picked, resulting in a loss. However, the question arises as to whether the railway authorities can be held responsible for this loss.
Consent to Travel in Over-Crowded Train
One argument against the railway authorities would be that they allowed the train to be over-crowded, which created a favorable environment for pickpocketing. However, this argument would not hold because it can be argued that Mr. X, as a legitimate passenger, had given his consent to travel in the over-crowded train. By choosing to board the train despite the crowded conditions, Mr. X accepted the risks associated with traveling in such circumstances. Therefore, it can be said that Mr. X voluntarily assumed the risk of potential losses, including the possibility of theft.
No Cause of Action
To establish a cause of action, it is necessary to demonstrate that a legal duty was owed by the defendant, that this duty was breached, and that the breach resulted in a loss or harm to the plaintiff. In this case, the railway authorities did not owe a legal duty to Mr. X specifically to prevent his pocket from being picked. Their duty primarily lies in providing transportation services and ensuring the safety of passengers. Therefore, there was no breach of a legal duty owed to Mr. X, and as a result, he does not have a cause of action against the railway authorities.
Conclusion
Based on the above analysis, it can be concluded that Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered due to his pocket being picked in an over-crowded train. There was no infringement of a legal right, and the mere fact that the loss was caused does not give rise to a cause of action.
In this scenario, Mr. X, a legitimate passenger, had his pocket picked while traveling in an over-crowded train. The question is whether he can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered. The correct answer is option 'C,' which states that Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of a legal right, and the mere fact that the loss was caused does not give rise to a cause of action. Let's explore the reasoning behind this answer in detail.
No Infringement of Legal Right
It is important to note that for a person to have a valid cause of action, there must be an infringement of a legal right. In this case, Mr. X's pocket was picked, resulting in a loss. However, the question arises as to whether the railway authorities can be held responsible for this loss.
Consent to Travel in Over-Crowded Train
One argument against the railway authorities would be that they allowed the train to be over-crowded, which created a favorable environment for pickpocketing. However, this argument would not hold because it can be argued that Mr. X, as a legitimate passenger, had given his consent to travel in the over-crowded train. By choosing to board the train despite the crowded conditions, Mr. X accepted the risks associated with traveling in such circumstances. Therefore, it can be said that Mr. X voluntarily assumed the risk of potential losses, including the possibility of theft.
No Cause of Action
To establish a cause of action, it is necessary to demonstrate that a legal duty was owed by the defendant, that this duty was breached, and that the breach resulted in a loss or harm to the plaintiff. In this case, the railway authorities did not owe a legal duty to Mr. X specifically to prevent his pocket from being picked. Their duty primarily lies in providing transportation services and ensuring the safety of passengers. Therefore, there was no breach of a legal duty owed to Mr. X, and as a result, he does not have a cause of action against the railway authorities.
Conclusion
Based on the above analysis, it can be concluded that Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered due to his pocket being picked in an over-crowded train. There was no infringement of a legal right, and the mere fact that the loss was caused does not give rise to a cause of action.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Question Description
The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger, Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose appropriate answer-a)Mr. X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered.b)Mr. X cannot sue because he had given his consent to travel in over-crowded train.c)Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give to a cause of action.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger, Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose appropriate answer-a)Mr. X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered.b)Mr. X cannot sue because he had given his consent to travel in over-crowded train.c)Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give to a cause of action.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger, Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose appropriate answer-a)Mr. X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered.b)Mr. X cannot sue because he had given his consent to travel in over-crowded train.c)Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give to a cause of action.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger, Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose appropriate answer-a)Mr. X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered.b)Mr. X cannot sue because he had given his consent to travel in over-crowded train.c)Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give to a cause of action.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger, Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose appropriate answer-a)Mr. X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered.b)Mr. X cannot sue because he had given his consent to travel in over-crowded train.c)Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give to a cause of action.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger, Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose appropriate answer-a)Mr. X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered.b)Mr. X cannot sue because he had given his consent to travel in over-crowded train.c)Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give to a cause of action.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger, Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose appropriate answer-a)Mr. X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered.b)Mr. X cannot sue because he had given his consent to travel in over-crowded train.c)Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give to a cause of action.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger, Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose appropriate answer-a)Mr. X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered.b)Mr. X cannot sue because he had given his consent to travel in over-crowded train.c)Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give to a cause of action.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger, Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose appropriate answer-a)Mr. X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered.b)Mr. X cannot sue because he had given his consent to travel in over-crowded train.c)Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give to a cause of action.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger, Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose appropriate answer-a)Mr. X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered.b)Mr. X cannot sue because he had given his consent to travel in over-crowded train.c)Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give to a cause of action.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger, Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose appropriate answer-a)Mr. X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered.b)Mr. X cannot sue because he had given his consent to travel in over-crowded train.c)Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give to a cause of action.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice The Railway authorities allowed a train to be over-crowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger, Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose appropriate answer-a)Mr. X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered.b)Mr. X cannot sue because he had given his consent to travel in over-crowded train.c)Mr. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give to a cause of action.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up
within 7 days!
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup