CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls a...
Start Learning for Free
Statements :
All dusters are bowls.
All bowls are shoes.
No shoe is a root.
All roots are flowers.
Q. Conclusions :
(i) No flower is a bowl.
(ii) All dusters are shoes.
- a)if only conclusion I follows;
- b)if only conclusion II follows;
- c)if either I or II follows;
- d)if neither I nor II follows; and
- e)if both I and II follow
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a roo...
It is clear from the venn diagram that both the conclusions follow.
Most Upvoted Answer
Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a roo...
OPTION B SHOULD BE RIGHT BECAUSE
IN FIRST CASE :-
ALL DUSTER ARE BOWLS
ALL BOWLS ARE SHOES SO, FROM THE RULE OF SYMMETRY IT SHOULD BE
ALL DUSTERS ARE SHOES
FOR SECOND CASE
NO SHOES IS A ROOT
ALL ROOTS ARE FLOWERS
THE IMMEDIATE INFERENCE OF NO X IS Y WILL BE{ NO Y IS X }
SO. THERE SHOULD BE NO RULE OF SYMMETRY SHOULD BE APPLICABLE
SO,
THE CORRECT ANSWER SHOULD BE "B" .
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a roo...
Given Information:
All dusters are bowls.
All bowls are shoes.
No shoe is a root.
All roots are flowers.
Conclusion:
(i) No flower is a bowl.
(ii) All dusters are shoes.
Explanation:
To logically deduce the conclusions that follow from the given statements, we need to analyze each statement and its relationship with other statements.
Statement 1: All dusters are bowls.
This statement implies that every duster falls under the category of a bowl. Therefore, it can be concluded that:
- All dusters are bowls. (Given)
Statement 2: All bowls are shoes.
This statement implies that every bowl falls under the category of a shoe. Therefore, it can be concluded that:
- All bowls are shoes. (Given)
Statement 3: No shoe is a root.
This statement implies that there is no shoe that falls under the category of a root. Therefore, it can be concluded that:
- No shoe is a root. (Given)
Statement 4: All roots are flowers.
This statement implies that every root falls under the category of a flower. Therefore, it can be concluded that:
- All roots are flowers. (Given)
Conclusion I: No flower is a bowl.
This conclusion implies that there is no flower that falls under the category of a bowl. To verify whether this conclusion follows logically from the given statements, we need to check whether there is any overlap between the categories of flower and bowl. As per the given statements, there is no direct relationship between flower and bowl. Therefore, it can be concluded that:
- No flower is a bowl. (Follows)
Conclusion II: All dusters are shoes.
This conclusion implies that every duster falls under the category of a shoe. To verify whether this conclusion follows logically from the given statements, we need to check whether there is any overlap between the categories of duster and shoe. As per the given statements, every bowl falls under the category of a shoe and every duster falls under the category of a bowl. Therefore, every duster falls under the category of a shoe. Hence, it can be concluded that:
- All dusters are shoes. (Follows)
Therefore, both conclusions I and II follow logically from the given statements.
Final answer:
Option E. Both conclusions I and II follow.
All dusters are bowls.
All bowls are shoes.
No shoe is a root.
All roots are flowers.
Conclusion:
(i) No flower is a bowl.
(ii) All dusters are shoes.
Explanation:
To logically deduce the conclusions that follow from the given statements, we need to analyze each statement and its relationship with other statements.
Statement 1: All dusters are bowls.
This statement implies that every duster falls under the category of a bowl. Therefore, it can be concluded that:
- All dusters are bowls. (Given)
Statement 2: All bowls are shoes.
This statement implies that every bowl falls under the category of a shoe. Therefore, it can be concluded that:
- All bowls are shoes. (Given)
Statement 3: No shoe is a root.
This statement implies that there is no shoe that falls under the category of a root. Therefore, it can be concluded that:
- No shoe is a root. (Given)
Statement 4: All roots are flowers.
This statement implies that every root falls under the category of a flower. Therefore, it can be concluded that:
- All roots are flowers. (Given)
Conclusion I: No flower is a bowl.
This conclusion implies that there is no flower that falls under the category of a bowl. To verify whether this conclusion follows logically from the given statements, we need to check whether there is any overlap between the categories of flower and bowl. As per the given statements, there is no direct relationship between flower and bowl. Therefore, it can be concluded that:
- No flower is a bowl. (Follows)
Conclusion II: All dusters are shoes.
This conclusion implies that every duster falls under the category of a shoe. To verify whether this conclusion follows logically from the given statements, we need to check whether there is any overlap between the categories of duster and shoe. As per the given statements, every bowl falls under the category of a shoe and every duster falls under the category of a bowl. Therefore, every duster falls under the category of a shoe. Hence, it can be concluded that:
- All dusters are shoes. (Follows)
Therefore, both conclusions I and II follow logically from the given statements.
Final answer:
Option E. Both conclusions I and II follow.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Question Description
Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a root.All roots are flowers.Q.Conclusions :(i) No flower is a bowl.(ii) All dusters are shoes.a)if only conclusion I follows;b)if only conclusion II follows;c)if either I or II follows;d)if neither I nor II follows; ande)if both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a root.All roots are flowers.Q.Conclusions :(i) No flower is a bowl.(ii) All dusters are shoes.a)if only conclusion I follows;b)if only conclusion II follows;c)if either I or II follows;d)if neither I nor II follows; ande)if both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a root.All roots are flowers.Q.Conclusions :(i) No flower is a bowl.(ii) All dusters are shoes.a)if only conclusion I follows;b)if only conclusion II follows;c)if either I or II follows;d)if neither I nor II follows; ande)if both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a root.All roots are flowers.Q.Conclusions :(i) No flower is a bowl.(ii) All dusters are shoes.a)if only conclusion I follows;b)if only conclusion II follows;c)if either I or II follows;d)if neither I nor II follows; ande)if both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a root.All roots are flowers.Q.Conclusions :(i) No flower is a bowl.(ii) All dusters are shoes.a)if only conclusion I follows;b)if only conclusion II follows;c)if either I or II follows;d)if neither I nor II follows; ande)if both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a root.All roots are flowers.Q.Conclusions :(i) No flower is a bowl.(ii) All dusters are shoes.a)if only conclusion I follows;b)if only conclusion II follows;c)if either I or II follows;d)if neither I nor II follows; ande)if both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a root.All roots are flowers.Q.Conclusions :(i) No flower is a bowl.(ii) All dusters are shoes.a)if only conclusion I follows;b)if only conclusion II follows;c)if either I or II follows;d)if neither I nor II follows; ande)if both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a root.All roots are flowers.Q.Conclusions :(i) No flower is a bowl.(ii) All dusters are shoes.a)if only conclusion I follows;b)if only conclusion II follows;c)if either I or II follows;d)if neither I nor II follows; ande)if both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a root.All roots are flowers.Q.Conclusions :(i) No flower is a bowl.(ii) All dusters are shoes.a)if only conclusion I follows;b)if only conclusion II follows;c)if either I or II follows;d)if neither I nor II follows; ande)if both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a root.All roots are flowers.Q.Conclusions :(i) No flower is a bowl.(ii) All dusters are shoes.a)if only conclusion I follows;b)if only conclusion II follows;c)if either I or II follows;d)if neither I nor II follows; ande)if both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a root.All roots are flowers.Q.Conclusions :(i) No flower is a bowl.(ii) All dusters are shoes.a)if only conclusion I follows;b)if only conclusion II follows;c)if either I or II follows;d)if neither I nor II follows; ande)if both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a root.All roots are flowers.Q.Conclusions :(i) No flower is a bowl.(ii) All dusters are shoes.a)if only conclusion I follows;b)if only conclusion II follows;c)if either I or II follows;d)if neither I nor II follows; ande)if both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup