All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / off... Start Learning for Free
Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / offensive to my friend. (C) / no error (D)
  • a)
    Few remarks
  • b)
    that he made were
  • c)
    offensive to my friend
  • d)
    no error
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Verified Answer
Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / offensive to my friend. (C) ...
Add ‘a’ before ‘few’
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / offensive to my friend. (C) ...
  1. Using "a few" instead of "few" in a sentence changes a sentence's meaning. Whereas "a few" implies a small number of some that is greater than two, "few" implies only a small number. Other words, like "very" or "quite," may also come before "a few" or "few" and further change sentence meaning. Examples can be found below.

Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / offensive to my friend. (C) ...
Explanation:
The error in the sentence is in part (A), as it should be "A few remarks" instead of "Few remarks." Let's break down the sentence to understand why this correction is necessary.

The sentence is talking about some remarks that the person made. The word "few" means a small number or a limited amount. However, in this context, it doesn't make sense to say "few remarks" because it implies that the person made only a small number of remarks, which is not the intended meaning.

On the other hand, "a few remarks" means some remarks or a small number of remarks. It implies that the person made more than one remark, but not necessarily a large number. This is the correct phrase to use in this sentence because it accurately conveys the intended meaning.

Therefore, the correct sentence should be:
" A few remarks that he made were offensive to my friend."
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Paretan newspaper editor: David Salino assails as distorted our quotation of remarks on Paretan values by the Qinkoan prime minister and bemoans what he sees as the likely consequences for Paretan- Qinkoan relations. Those consequences will not be our fault, however, since officials at the Qinkoan embassy and scholars at the Institute of Qinkoan Studies have all confirmed that, as printed, our quotation was an acceptable translation of the prime ministers remarks.No newspaper can fairly be blamed for the consequences of its reporting when that reporting is accurate.Which one of the following is an assumption on which the editors argument depends?

India's foreign policy is undergoing a series of fundamental transformations in terms of its underlying narratives, processes and desired endgames. There is a conscious and consistent effort to break with the past, no matter how the outcomes might look eventually.What could potentially make this change last longer than initially thought is that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has the mandate, the capability and the willingness to effect major changes and re-conceptualise the country's external security orientation. And yet, one must ask: Does this really mark a fundamental policy shift, or does it just amount to a slew of optics-friendly acts that are well-choreographed but not visionary?One of the most striking features of the Modi government's foreign policy is its propensity for risk-taking - quite unlike most previous governments, barring perhaps that of Indira Gandhi. Armed with a clear majority, the government is keen to play offensive, undoing the decades-old defensive Indian strategic behaviour. New Delhi's actions at Doklam; its surgical strikes against Pakistan in 2016 after the Uri terror attacks; and the Balakot air strikes in the wake of Pulwama attacks this February - notwithstanding the questionable material outcomes in all these cases - are examples of this new-found offensive streak and risktaking tendency.Q. According to the author, the undergoing change in India's foreign policy can be concisely described as

India's foreign policy is undergoing a series of fundamental transformations in terms of its underlying narratives, processes and desired endgames. There is a conscious and consistent effort to break with the past, no matter how the outcomes might look eventually.What could potentially make this change last longer than initially thought is that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has the mandate, the capability and the willingness to effect major changes and re-conceptualise the country's external security orientation. And yet, one must ask: Does this really mark a fundamental policy shift, or does it just amount to a slew of optics-friendly acts that are well-choreographed but not visionary?One of the most striking features of the Modi government's foreign policy is its propensity for risk-taking - quite unlike most previous governments, barring perhaps that of Indira Gandhi. Armed with a clear majority, the government is keen to play offensive, undoing the decades-old defensive Indian strategic behaviour. New Delhi's actions at Doklam; its surgical strikes against Pakistan in 2016 after the Uri terror attacks; and the Balakot air strikes in the wake of Pulwama attacks this February - notwithstanding the questionable material outcomes in all these cases - are examples of this new-found offensive streak and risktaking tendency.Q. The phrase "Optics-friendly" in the passage, means

India's foreign policy is undergoing a series of fundamental transformations in terms of its underlying narratives, processes and desired endgames. There is a conscious and consistent effort to break with the past, no matter how the outcomes might look eventually.What could potentially make this change last longer than initially thought is that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has the mandate, the capability and the willingness to effect major changes and re-conceptualise the country's external security orientation. And yet, one must ask: Does this really mark a fundamental policy shift, or does it just amount to a slew of optics-friendly acts that are well-choreographed but not visionary?One of the most striking features of the Modi government's foreign policy is its propensity for risk-taking - quite unlike most previous governments, barring perhaps that of Indira Gandhi. Armed with a clear majority, the government is keen to play offensive, undoing the decades-old defensive Indian strategic behaviour. New Delhi's actions at Doklam; its surgical strikes against Pakistan in 2016 after the Uri terror attacks; and the Balakot air strikes in the wake of Pulwama attacks this February - notwithstanding the questionable material outcomes in all these cases - are examples of this new-found offensive streak and risktaking tendency.Q. The phrase "break with the past" refers to

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / offensive to my friend. (C) / no error (D)a)Few remarksb)that he made werec)offensive to my friendd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / offensive to my friend. (C) / no error (D)a)Few remarksb)that he made werec)offensive to my friendd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / offensive to my friend. (C) / no error (D)a)Few remarksb)that he made werec)offensive to my friendd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / offensive to my friend. (C) / no error (D)a)Few remarksb)that he made werec)offensive to my friendd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / offensive to my friend. (C) / no error (D)a)Few remarksb)that he made werec)offensive to my friendd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / offensive to my friend. (C) / no error (D)a)Few remarksb)that he made werec)offensive to my friendd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / offensive to my friend. (C) / no error (D)a)Few remarksb)that he made werec)offensive to my friendd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / offensive to my friend. (C) / no error (D)a)Few remarksb)that he made werec)offensive to my friendd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / offensive to my friend. (C) / no error (D)a)Few remarksb)that he made werec)offensive to my friendd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Few remarks (A) / that he made were (B) / offensive to my friend. (C) / no error (D)a)Few remarksb)that he made werec)offensive to my friendd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup