There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room. (C) / no error (D)a)There wereb)no less than fifty personsc)present in the roomd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (...

There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room. (C) / no error (D)

a)
There were
b)
no less than fifty persons
c)
present in the room
d)
no error

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room....

Replace ‘less than’ by ‘fewer than’.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room....

The given sentence is grammatically correct. However, option B needs to be corrected. It should be "no fewer than fifty persons" instead of "no less than fifty persons".

Explanation:

- The sentence is in the past tense and uses the verb "were" to indicate that something existed or happened in the past.
- The subject of the sentence is "There", which is used to introduce the existence of something.
- The prepositional phrase "in the room" tells us where the fifty persons were present.
- The use of "no less than" in option B is incorrect because "less" is used to compare quantities that can be measured, while "fewer" is used to compare quantities that can be counted. Since persons can be counted, "no fewer than" should be used instead of "no less than".
- Therefore, the correct option is B, with the correction "no fewer than fifty persons".

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Free Test

FREE

Test: Adjective- 1
20 Ques | 15 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CLAT tests

Community Answer

There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room....

Replace ‘less than’ by ‘fewer than’.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

The meeting was postponed (

View answer

The Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill, 2017 allows for a person to be declared as a fugitive economic offender (FEO) if: (i) an arrest warrant has been issued against him for any specified offences where the value involved is over Rs 100 crore, and (ii) he has left the country and refuses to return to face prosecution.To declare a person an FEO, an application will be filed in a Special Court (designated under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002) containing details of the properties to be confiscated, and any information about the person’s whereabouts. The Special Court will require the person to appear at a specified place at least six weeks from issue of notice. Proceedings will be terminated if the person appears. The Bill allows authorities to provisionally attach properties of an accused, while the application is pending before the Special Court. Upon declaration as an FEO, properties of a person may be confiscated and vested in the central government, free of encumbrances (rights and claims in the property). The Bill does not specify how the central government will use the sale proceeds. That is, would the government be obliged to share the sale proceeds with persons who may have a claim against the FEO.Further, the FEO or any company associated with him may be barred from filing or defending civil claims. Under Clause 14, any court or tribunal may bar a FEO from filing or defending any civil claim before it. Further, the Bill allows courts to bar a company from filing or defending any civil claim before it if the promoter, key managerial personnel (such as manager or CEO), or majority shareholder is an FEO. It may be argued that such a bar could violate Article 21 of the Constitution. Article 21 states that no person (or company) can be deprived of their right to life or personal liberty, except by law. Courts have interpreted this to include the right to access justice, which cannot be taken away. This right includes the availability of a forum which aggrieved persons may approach to seek legal remedy. The question is whether a bar on filing and defending claims would violate this right. For instance, an individual who is declared an FEO may be involved in a marriage suit or inheritance dispute. Under Clause 14, courts are allowed to bar the individual from exercising his right to file or defend such a claim. Further, there may be cases where an FEO is the majority shareholder of a company. In such cases, even though the company is a separate legal entity, it may be barred from filing or defending cases.Q. A company may be barred from filing a suit against a supplier of goods or from defending a case where tax dues are imposed on it. There may also be instances where creditors obtain court orders for repayment of loans against the company, without the company having an opportunity to present its defence. In all such cases, the interests of the remaining shareholders will not be protected owing to such a bar on companies. A company can be barred from all of the above in which of the following cases?

View answer

Property is mainly divided into two parts, namely movable and immovable. Any offence which is committed in regard to any property whether it is movable or immovable is punishable under the provisions of the law of Crimes or the Indian Penal Code.PROPERTY OFFENCES ARE PROVIDED HEREUNDER,APPLY THEM WHEREVER APPLICABLE: THEFT AND ATTEMPT TO THEFT Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any moveable property out of the possession of any person without that person's consent, moves that property, is said to commit theft. Whoever attempts to commit an offence punishable by the IPC and in such attempt does any act towards the commission of the offence, shall be punished. EXTORTION Whoever intentionally puts any person in fear of any injury to that person and dishonestly induces the person so put in fear to deliver to any person, any property or valuable security, or anything signed or sealed which may be converted into a valuable security, commits "extortion". ROBBERY Theft is "robbery" if by committing the theft or attempting to commit the theft, the offender voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint. Extortion is "robbery" if the offender, at the time of committing the extortion, is in the presence of the person put in fear of death, hurt, or wrongful restraint to that person and, by so putting in fear, induces the person so put in fear to deliver up the thing extorted. DACOITY When five or more persons conjointly commit a robbery, or attempt to commit a robbery, and persons present and aiding such commission or attempt, amount to five or more, every person so committing, attempting or aiding, is said to commit "dacoity". Q. A makes an attempt to steal some jewels by breaking open a box and after opening the box, finds that there is no jewel in it. He takes the box itself and runs away. Based on the information in the passage above what offence, if any, has A committed?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The main objective of Payment of Wages Act, 1936 is to avoid unnecessary delay in the payment of wages and to prevent unauthorised deductions from the wages. It applies to the payment of wages (on or before 7th day or 10th day of the month) to persons employed in any factory, to persons employed (otherwise than in a factory) upon any railway by a railway administration or either directly or through a sub-contractor by a person fulfilling a contract with a railway administration and to persons employed in an industrial or other establishment.Wages averaging less than Rs. 6500.00 per month only are covered or protected by the Act by the amendment in 2005 by {Section 1(6)}. Wages means contractual wages and not overtime wages. They are not to be taken into account for deciding the applicability of the Act in the context of Section 1(6) of the Act. Wages must be paid in current coin or currency notes or in both and not in kind. It is, however, permissible for an employer to pay wages by cheque of by crediting them in the bank account if so authorised in writing by an employed person.The provisions of the Act regarding the imposition of fines on the employed person are as follows:The employer must exhibit on his premises a list of acts or omissions for which fines can be imposed. Before imposing a fine on an employed person, he must be given an opportunity of showing cause against the fine. The amount of fine must not exceed three percent of the wages. A fine cannot be imposed on an employed person who is under the age of fifteen years. A fine cannot be recovered by installments or after ninety days from the day of the act or omission for which it is imposed. Amount realized from fines must be applied to purposes beneficial to employed persons.Any person desiring to impose a fine on an employed person or to make a deduction for damage or loss shall explain personally or in writing to the said person the act or omission, or damage or loss in respect of which the fine or deduction is proposed to be imposed, and the amount of fine or deduction, which it is proposed to impose, and shall hear his explanation in the presence of at least one other person, or obtain it in writing.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Payment of Wages Act, 1936 article by netlawman]Q.Under the Payment of Wages Act, what is the maximum percentage of wages that can be imposed as a fine on an employed person?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The main objective of Payment of Wages Act, 1936 is to avoid unnecessary delay in the payment of wages and to prevent unauthorised deductions from the wages. It applies to the payment of wages (on or before 7th day or 10th day of the month) to persons employed in any factory, to persons employed (otherwise than in a factory) upon any railway by a railway administration or either directly or through a sub-contractor by a person fulfilling a contract with a railway administration and to persons employed in an industrial or other establishment.Wages averaging less than Rs. 6500.00 per month only are covered or protected by the Act by the amendment in 2005 by {Section 1(6)}. Wages means contractual wages and not overtime wages. They are not to be taken into account for deciding the applicability of the Act in the context of Section 1(6) of the Act. Wages must be paid in current coin or currency notes or in both and not in kind. It is, however, permissible for an employer to pay wages by cheque of by crediting them in the bank account if so authorised in writing by an employed person.The provisions of the Act regarding the imposition of fines on the employed person are as follows:The employer must exhibit on his premises a list of acts or omissions for which fines can be imposed. Before imposing a fine on an employed person, he must be given an opportunity of showing cause against the fine. The amount of fine must not exceed three percent of the wages. A fine cannot be imposed on an employed person who is under the age of fifteen years. A fine cannot be recovered by installments or after ninety days from the day of the act or omission for which it is imposed. Amount realized from fines must be applied to purposes beneficial to employed persons.Any person desiring to impose a fine on an employed person or to make a deduction for damage or loss shall explain personally or in writing to the said person the act or omission, or damage or loss in respect of which the fine or deduction is proposed to be imposed, and the amount of fine or deduction, which it is proposed to impose, and shall hear his explanation in the presence of at least one other person, or obtain it in writing.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Payment of Wages Act, 1936 article by netlawman]Q.Which of the following is NOT covered or protected by the Payment of Wages Act, 1936?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room. (C) / no error (D)a)There wereb)no less than fifty personsc)present in the roomd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room. (C) / no error (D)a)There wereb)no less than fifty personsc)present in the roomd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room. (C) / no error (D)a)There wereb)no less than fifty personsc)present in the roomd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room. (C) / no error (D)a)There wereb)no less than fifty personsc)present in the roomd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room. (C) / no error (D)a)There wereb)no less than fifty personsc)present in the roomd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room. (C) / no error (D)a)There wereb)no less than fifty personsc)present in the roomd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room. (C) / no error (D)a)There wereb)no less than fifty personsc)present in the roomd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room. (C) / no error (D)a)There wereb)no less than fifty personsc)present in the roomd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room. (C) / no error (D)a)There wereb)no less than fifty personsc)present in the roomd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice There were (A) / no less than fifty persons (B) / present in the room. (C) / no error (D)a)There wereb)no less than fifty personsc)present in the roomd)no errorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam