CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of bo... Start Learning for Free
Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of boys and Vishal is 18th from the right end. Ganesh is 11th from Amar towards the right and 3rd from Vishal towards the right end. How many boys are there in the row?

  • a)
    45                      

  • b)
    26

  • c)
    39                      

  • d)
    41

  • e)
    None of these

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of boys and Vishal is 18th fro...
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of boys and Vishal is 18th fro...
Given information:
- Amar is 16th from the left end.
- Vishal is 18th from the right end.
- Ganesh is 11th from Amar towards the right.
- Ganesh is 3rd from Vishal towards the right end.

To find: How many boys are there in the row?

Solution:
1. Let's first find the position of Ganesh from the left end of the row.
- We know that Ganesh is 11th from Amar towards the right.
- So, the position of Amar from the right end can be calculated as: Total number of boys - 16 + 1 (including Amar himself) = Total number of boys - 15.
- Hence, the position of Ganesh from the left end can be calculated as: Total number of boys - 15 - 11 + 1 (including Ganesh himself) = Total number of boys - 24.
2. Now, we can use the second piece of information to find the position of Ganesh from the left end.
- We know that Ganesh is 3rd from Vishal towards the right end.
- So, the position of Vishal from the left end can be calculated as: Total number of boys - 18 + 1 (including Vishal himself) = Total number of boys - 17.
- Hence, the position of Ganesh from the left end can be calculated as: Total number of boys - 17 - 3 + 1 (including Ganesh himself) = Total number of boys - 19.
3. Equating the two expressions we got for the position of Ganesh from the left end, we get:
Total number of boys - 24 = Total number of boys - 19.
Solving this equation, we get:
Total number of boys = 41.

Therefore, there are 41 boys in the row. Hence, option D is the correct answer.
Free Test
Community Answer
Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of boys and Vishal is 18th fro...
Ganesh's position is given from left as well as right ,from left he is on 27th position i.e (amar's position +Ganesh's position) and from left he is on 15th (Ganesh"s position _vishsl's position) now that we know the position of one person from left and right we just have to put it on the formula i.e (position of a person from left same from right)_1 and we get the ans
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Supreme Court agreed to examine the public interest litigation seeking social security benefits to gig workers and platform workers engaged by Uber, Ola Cabs, Swiggy and Zomato. It was argued before the SC that gig workers and platform workers need to be recognised as workmen within the meaning of all the applicable social security legislation. Referring to the Unorganised Workers' Social Security Act, 2008, it was contended that these workers are unorganised workers within its meaning and hence, they are entitled to registration and social security under it. These workers are not what their companies have been claiming, which is that they are independent contractors.The Court's attention was drawn to the United Kingdom Supreme Court judgment that has analysed the contract between Uber and the employee and found that the contract is only a subterfuge and the real relationship between Uber and its employee is that of employer and employee. The plea asserts that the denial of social security like pension and health insurance to gig workers and platform workers is an affront to workers' right to life and right against forced labour that are secured by Articles 14 (equality), 21 (right to lif e) and 23 (prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour) of the Constitution of India. The plea seeks a declaration from the court that gig workers are unorganised workers and/or wage workers within the meaning of the Unorganised Workers' Social Security Act, 2008, and hence entitled to be registered under the said Act.An independent contractor works on their own, they are responsible for taxes and insurance. If they work for an agency, that agency may be responsible for paying their taxes. It depends on the relationship between the worker and the organisation. In the alternative, the petitioners seek the benefit of the existing social security laws since according to them, the relationship between the aggregator and the driver is one of employer and employee. The mere fact that their employers call themselves aggregators and enter into so-called partnership agreements does not take away from the fact that there exists a jural relationship of employer and employee between them, the plea argues. The said contracts, the plea states, are a mere device to disguise the nature of the relationship, which is de jure and de facto a relationship of employer and worker, being a contract of employment.Q. Direction and Control Test: If a person receives directions from the employer on how to do the job, then he is an employee. If not, he is an independent contractor.Imagine that Ramesh is a taxi driver, and Rajesh asked Ramesh to take him to the airport and in-between stop at two places. Is Ramesh an employee or independent contractor?

The law of torts is fashioned as "an instrument to make people adhere to a conduct of reasonable behaviour and respect the rights and interests of one another." This it does by protecting interests and by providing for situations when a person whose protected interest is violated can recover compensation for the loss suffered by him from the person who has violated the same.Consequently, it has been implied that there are three constituents of tort:1. Wrongful Act: There must be a wrongful act committed by a person, that is, the defendant.2. Legal Damage: The wrongful act must give rise to legal damage to a person, that is, the plaintiff.3. Legal Remedy: The wrongful act must be of such a nature so as to give a rise to legal remedy in the form of an action for damages.An act which, prima facie, appears to be innocent may become tortuous, if it invades the legal right of another person. A simple example is that of erecting a structure on one's own land. It is completely lawful to enjoy one's own property by erecting whatever one wants to, on his land. To every right there corresponds an obligation or duty. If the right is legal, so is the duty. If the right is contingent, so is the obligation.INJURIA SINE DAMNOInjuria sine damno refers to the cases of infringement of an absolute private right without any actual loss or damage. Here the actual damage means physical loss in terms of money, comfort, health, etc. This maxim says that the infringement of certain rights is itself considered as damage and there is no need to prove that an actual damage is caused. Every person has an absolute right over his property, to the immunity of his person, and an infringement of these rights is actionable per se. Here, the law presumes damage because certain acts are so likely to result in harm owing to their mischievous tendency that law has strictly prohibited them. Under this maxim, actual or perceptible or appreciable loss or detriment is not indispensable to the foundation of an action.DAMNUM SINE INJURIADamnum sine injuria involves the cases in which there is no infringement of any right but the plaintiff has suffered actual damage. Here the actual damage means physical loss in terms of money, comfort, health, etc. In these cases, no action lies. Mere loss in money or money's worth does not, by itself, constitute a tort. The most terrible harm may be inflicted on one man by another without a legal redress being obtainable as the doer did not infringe any legal right of the sufferer. The maxim means, it can be implied, that there are no legal remedies for moral wrongs unless some rights of the victim are being violated.Q. X had been teaching at St. Xavier College since many years. His relationship with the school management became strained due to his meager salary. So he started his own school just opposite St. Xavier College owing to which the number of students taking admission in St. Xavier College reduced and they suffered huge financial loss. Can management authorities of St. Xavier College sue X for compensation?

The law of torts is fashioned as "an instrument to make people adhere to a conduct of reasonable behaviour and respect the rights and interests of one another." This it does by protecting interests and by providing for situations when a person whose protected interest is violated can recover compensation for the loss suffered by him from the person who has violated the same.Consequently, it has been implied that there are three constituents of tort:1. Wrongful Act: There must be a wrongful act committed by a person, that is, the defendant.2. Legal Damage: The wrongful act must give rise to legal damage to a person, that is, the plaintiff.3. Legal Remedy: The wrongful act must be of such a nature so as to give a rise to legal remedy in the form of an action for damages.An act which, prima facie, appears to be innocent may become tortuous, if it invades the legal right of another person. A simple example is that of erecting a structure on one's own land. It is completely lawful to enjoy one's own property by erecting whatever one wants to, on his land. To every right there corresponds an obligation or duty. If the right is legal, so is the duty. If the right is contingent, so is the obligation.INJURIA SINE DAMNOInjuria sine damno refers to the cases of infringement of an absolute private right without any actual loss or damage. Here the actual damage means physical loss in terms of money, comfort, health, etc. This maxim says that the infringement of certain rights is itself considered as damage and there is no need to prove that an actual damage is caused. Every person has an absolute right over his property, to the immunity of his person, and an infringement of these rights is actionable per se. Here, the law presumes damage because certain acts are so likely to result in harm owing to their mischievous tendency that law has strictly prohibited them. Under this maxim, actual or perceptible or appreciable loss or detriment is not indispensable to the foundation of an action.DAMNUM SINE INJURIADamnum sine injuria involves the cases in which there is no infringement of any right but the plaintiff has suffered actual damage. Here the actual damage means physical loss in terms of money, comfort, health, etc. In these cases, no action lies. Mere loss in money or money's worth does not, by itself, constitute a tort. The most terrible harm may be inflicted on one man by another without a legal redress being obtainable as the doer did not infringe any legal right of the sufferer. The maxim means, it can be implied, that there are no legal remedies for moral wrongs unless some rights of the victim are being violated.Q. It was an election day and Dude was very happy that he would get to vote for the first time as he had turned 18 finally. However, when he was on his way to the polling booth, Officer Badass stopped him from voting. Dude was an ideal devotee and wanted the GJP party member, Dogface, to win. He wanted to vote for him but couldn't because officer Badass stopped him. However, Dogface won. Decide the liability of the officer.

Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.A Maxim refers to the established principles and prepositions. That is the general rules or principles or guidelines laid down and which are to be followed by the general public. Maxims are very useful, as with the help of this particular point of law can be understood clearly and precisely and also used for the proper solution of the cases. Maxims are very widely used in various branches of law and so in the law of torts.As law is a difficult subject having various interpretations, rules, and principles. It is therefore considered necessary to have these combinations of various Latin and French words to be used for much clearer understanding. However, the only difficult part of the use of these maxims is that they have to be applied with full precaution. The person using these maxims has to make sure that whether the case in which it is applied has its application in the same manner, or whether it is an exception to the general rule, as any alterations of any of these maxims would be dangerous.Injuria Sine Damno is a legal maxim, which means injury or loss or damage so caused to the plaintiff without suffering any physical injury or damage. It is a Latin term, where Injuria refers to injury, Sine refers to without and Damno refers to a property or any physical loss. Therefore, the term refers to injury suffered without actual loss. In this case, the plaintiff doesnt have to prove the damages suffered, he only has to prove that there is some legal damage suffered by him, that is the action so brought is actionable per se. For example, where A roams around Bs house without any justification then in that case, there is a violation of the legal right of B and in such cases, this maxim is applicable.Damnum Sine Injuria is a maxim, which refers to injury which is being suffered by the plaintiff but there is no violation of any legal right of a person. In such circumstances, where there is no violation of the legal right but the injury or damage is being suffered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff cant bring an action against the other for the same, as it is not actionable in law, unless there is some infringement of a legal right.The literal meaning of Damnum Sine Injuria refers to loss or damage in terms of money, property or any physical loss without the infringement of any legal right. It is not actionable in law even if the act so did was intentional and was done to cause injury to other but without infringing on the legal right of the person.Q.Rakesh, a farmer, went to his nearby voting booth to cast his vote for elections. Manoj, a police officer at the election duty, refused to allow Rakesh to cast the vote and provided no reason for the same. Rakesh filed a suit against Manoj as he denied his right of vote. Will the police officer be held liable?

The law of torts is fashioned as "an instrument to make people adhere to a conduct of reasonable behaviour and respect the rights and interests of one another." This it does by protecting interests and by providing for situations when a person whose protected interest is violated can recover compensation for the loss suffered by him from the person who has violated the same.Consequently, it has been implied that there are three constituents of tort:1. Wrongful Act: There must be a wrongful act committed by a person, that is, the defendant.2. Legal Damage: The wrongful act must give rise to legal damage to a person, that is, the plaintiff.3. Legal Remedy: The wrongful act must be of such a nature so as to give a rise to legal remedy in the form of an action for damages.An act which, prima facie, appears to be innocent may become tortuous, if it invades the legal right of another person. A simple example is that of erecting a structure on one's own land. It is completely lawful to enjoy one's own property by erecting whatever one wants to, on his land. To every right there corresponds an obligation or duty. If the right is legal, so is the duty. If the right is contingent, so is the obligation.INJURIA SINE DAMNOInjuria sine damno refers to the cases of infringement of an absolute private right without any actual loss or damage. Here the actual damage means physical loss in terms of money, comfort, health, etc. This maxim says that the infringement of certain rights is itself considered as damage and there is no need to prove that an actual damage is caused. Every person has an absolute right over his property, to the immunity of his person, and an infringement of these rights is actionable per se. Here, the law presumes damage because certain acts are so likely to result in harm owing to their mischievous tendency that law has strictly prohibited them. Under this maxim, actual or perceptible or appreciable loss or detriment is not indispensable to the foundation of an action.DAMNUM SINE INJURIADamnum sine injuria involves the cases in which there is no infringement of any right but the plaintiff has suffered actual damage. Here the actual damage means physical loss in terms of money, comfort, health, etc. In these cases, no action lies. Mere loss in money or money's worth does not, by itself, constitute a tort. The most terrible harm may be inflicted on one man by another without a legal redress being obtainable as the doer did not infringe any legal right of the sufferer. The maxim means, it can be implied, that there are no legal remedies for moral wrongs unless some rights of the victim are being violated.Q. Injuria Sine Damnum means injury without damage.Injuria means violation of legal right which tenders the action in law of torts. X, who was the returning officer at a polling booth in Faridabad, wrongly refused to register a duly tendered vote of Y in the assembly elections, even though Y was an eligible voter.The candidate in whose favour Y wanted to vote, was declared elected. Give the most appropriate answer from the options given below.

Top Courses for CLAT

Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of boys and Vishal is 18th from the right end. Ganesh is 11th from Amar towards the right and 3rd from Vishal towards the right end. How many boys are there in the row?a)45b)26c)39d)41e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of boys and Vishal is 18th from the right end. Ganesh is 11th from Amar towards the right and 3rd from Vishal towards the right end. How many boys are there in the row?a)45b)26c)39d)41e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of boys and Vishal is 18th from the right end. Ganesh is 11th from Amar towards the right and 3rd from Vishal towards the right end. How many boys are there in the row?a)45b)26c)39d)41e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of boys and Vishal is 18th from the right end. Ganesh is 11th from Amar towards the right and 3rd from Vishal towards the right end. How many boys are there in the row?a)45b)26c)39d)41e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of boys and Vishal is 18th from the right end. Ganesh is 11th from Amar towards the right and 3rd from Vishal towards the right end. How many boys are there in the row?a)45b)26c)39d)41e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of boys and Vishal is 18th from the right end. Ganesh is 11th from Amar towards the right and 3rd from Vishal towards the right end. How many boys are there in the row?a)45b)26c)39d)41e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of boys and Vishal is 18th from the right end. Ganesh is 11th from Amar towards the right and 3rd from Vishal towards the right end. How many boys are there in the row?a)45b)26c)39d)41e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of boys and Vishal is 18th from the right end. Ganesh is 11th from Amar towards the right and 3rd from Vishal towards the right end. How many boys are there in the row?a)45b)26c)39d)41e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of boys and Vishal is 18th from the right end. Ganesh is 11th from Amar towards the right and 3rd from Vishal towards the right end. How many boys are there in the row?a)45b)26c)39d)41e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Amar is 16th from the left end in a row of boys and Vishal is 18th from the right end. Ganesh is 11th from Amar towards the right and 3rd from Vishal towards the right end. How many boys are there in the row?a)45b)26c)39d)41e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev