The basic difference between the funeral speeches of Brutus and Antony is that Brutus, characteristically, appeals to reason and logic, while Antony, characteristically, appeals to emotions. ... He explains his reasons for killing Caesar. He is also a trained orator and delivers a sort of model of classic rhetoric.

The main difference between their speech are as follow:-

1.. Brutus haven't any big reason to show that Julius was really ambitious but Antony gave many reasons in favour of Julius to prove that he wasn't ambitious.

2.. Brutus speech touched the mind of citizens but the speech of Antony touch the hearts of citizens.

Thank you... :-)

Comparison and Contrast between Antony and Brutus' Speeches at the Funeral




Introduction:
The funeral speeches delivered by Antony and Brutus in William Shakespeare's play, "Julius Caesar," are two of the most iconic and powerful speeches in literary history. Both speeches are delivered by close friends of Caesar, Antony being loyal to him and Brutus being involved in his assassination. While both speeches aim to persuade the Roman citizens, there are significant differences in their content, tone, and effectiveness.




Comparison:

1. Content:
- Antony's speech predominantly focuses on praising Caesar and highlighting his virtues, while subtly criticizing the conspirators. He appeals to the emotions of the crowd by emphasizing Caesar's generosity and achievements.
- Brutus, on the other hand, takes a more logical and rational approach. He explains the reasons behind Caesar's assassination and emphasizes his love for Rome. Brutus justifies the conspirators' actions as being for the greater good of Rome.

2. Tone:
- Antony's speech is filled with pathos and emotional appeals. He cleverly uses rhetorical devices, such as repetition and irony, to incite the crowd's anger and sympathy. His tone gradually becomes more passionate and vengeful, which stirs the emotions of the citizens.
- Brutus maintains a calm and composed tone throughout his speech. He speaks in a measured and rational manner, attempting to convince the crowd through logic and reason. His tone reflects his belief in the righteousness of his actions.

3. Effectiveness:
- Antony's speech proves to be more effective in swaying the crowd's opinion. He skillfully manipulates their emotions, turning the citizens against the conspirators. By showing Caesar's will and describing his wounds, Antony captures the people's sympathy, leading to a revolt against the assassins.
- Brutus initially gains the crowd's support due to his reputation as an honorable man. However, Antony's compelling oration eventually turns the tide against him. The citizens become enraged, questioning the intentions of the conspirators and demanding revenge.




Conclusion:
While both Antony and Brutus deliver powerful speeches at Caesar's funeral, Antony's speech emerges as more influential and persuasive. By appealing to the emotions of the Roman citizens and skillfully using rhetoric, Antony successfully turns the crowd against the conspirators and sparks a rebellion. Brutus, although initially gaining support through his logical approach, ultimately fails to counter Antony's impassioned words. The stark contrast in their speeches showcases the power of language and persuasion in shaping public opinion.