Legal Principle: andlsquo; Audi alteram partemandrsquo; is a Latin phrase which means andlsquo;hear the other sideandrsquo;. It is the principle that no person should be judged without a fair hearing.Fact Situation: Sanjay, in Delhi, is accused of theft and brought before the Court. The magistrate discovers that Sanjay is mute.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above? Options:a)The principle is not applicable to Sanjay since he is mute.b)The principle is applicable to Sanjay even though he cannot speak since he can be asked to write down his defence.c)The Magistrate has to take all measures to understand what Sanjay has to convey about the accusation against him.d)Since it is a Latin principle it is not applicable in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem&...

Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem’ is a Latin phrase which means ‘hear the other side’. It is the principle that no person should be judged without a fair hearing.

Fact Situation: Sanjay, in Delhi, is accused of theft and brought before the Court. The magistrate discovers that Sanjay is mute.

Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above? Options:

a)
The principle is not applicable to Sanjay since he is mute.
b)
The principle is applicable to Sanjay even though he cannot speak since he can be asked to write down his defence.
c)
The Magistrate has to take all measures to understand what Sanjay has to convey about the accusation against him.
d)
Since it is a Latin principle it is not applicable in India.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem’ is a Latin phrase ...

A legal principle is a rule or guideline that is established by a court or other legal authority and is used to interpret and apply the law in specific cases. Legal principles are based on legal precedent, statutory law, and common law and are used to provide consistency and predictability in the legal system. They can be used to resolve disputes and make decisions in legal cases, and are often applied by judges and lawyers when interpreting and applying the law. Examples of legal principles include the presumption of innocence, the doctrine of precedent, and the rule of law.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Free Test

FREE

Test: CLAT 2018 Past Year Paper
200 Ques | 120 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CLAT tests

Community Answer

Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem’ is a Latin phrase ...

In a principle it is given that court have to hear or understand both side clearly .So as per principle C is correct option.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Legal Principle: The Latin maxim nemo bis punitur pro eodem delictomeans that nobody can be punished twice for the same offence.Fact Situation: Sajan, a petty thief, is caught and thrashed thoroughly by the people before being handed over to the police. Sajan pleads before the magistrate that since he was already thrashed by the people he should not be again punished by the State.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above ? Options

View answer

Section 154 of the Code requires that every information regarding the commission of any cognizable offence is to be reduced to writing either by the police officer-in-charge or under his direction. The written information shall be read over to and signed by the person giving it. This is known as ‘first information’. The main object of the first information report is to set the criminal law in motion and to set the investigation process in reference to the alleged offence. The FIR is an essential piece of any criminal trial in order to corroborate the evidence. The object of insisting upon the prompt lodging of the FIR is to obtain prior information regarding the circumstances in which crime was committed, the name of actual culprits and the part played by them as well as the names of eye-witnesses.The first provision to the section provides any information given by any woman in relation to any specified offences is required to be recorded by a woman police officer. The second proviso lays down that any offence which is specified in the first proviso is alleged to be committed against the person who is either mentally or physically disabled is to be recorded by the police officer at the residence of such person or at any other place convenient to such person in presence of an interpreter or a special educator. It is further provided that all such information shall be videographed and the police officer gets the statement to be recorded by the Magistrate.Section 156 of the Cr.P.C. empowers the police officer to investigate a cognizable case without the order of the Magistrate. The police officer can investigate the case only where the Court has the jurisdiction over the local areas.Section 155 of the Code deals with the information in case of non-cognizable offences and their investigation. All the information received under this section will be recorded by the police officer in charge and will be entered in such books as may be prescribed by the State Government. According to section 155 (2), a police officer is not permitted to investigate a case relating to the non-cognizable offence without the order of the Magistrate who has the power to try such cases. Moreover, no police officer has the power to arrest any person in the non-cognizable offence unless he has the warrant to arrest. Further, as per section 155 (4) if any case involves 2 or more offences and among all, if one is the cognizable offence, the entire case shall be deemed to be a cognizable case.Q. Which of the following statements is true regarding a cognizable case?

View answer

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labeled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.Facts: Jethalal was the owner of an electronic shop 'Gada Electronics'. One day he got stuck in his godown after the shop closed; with some people's help, he managed to break the lock and get out, but a police patrol team saw him with the broken lock and arrested him for the charge of breaking. Two days went by, and they kept him in custody for interrogation as the senior inspector wasn't around.Decide.

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Karnataka Legislative Assembly passed the Karnataka Right to Freedom of Religion Bill, 2021, commonly referred to as the Anti-Conversion Bill, amid opposition protests. The bill states, "No person shall convert or attempt to convert, either directly or otherwise, any other person from one religion to another by use of misrepresentation, force, undue influence, coercion, allurement or any fraudulent means, or by marriage, nor shall any person abet or conspire for conversions." It, however, provides an exemption in the case of a person who reconverts to his immediate previous religion as the same shall not be deemed to be a conversion under this act.According to the proposed legislation, complaints regarding conversions can be filed by family members or any other person who is related to the individual who is getting converted. A jail term along with fine have been proposed for those violating the law in the case of people from general categories, and an enhanced jail term and a fine has been mooted for those converting minors, women or persons from SC/ST communities.The bill also envisages payment of a compensation (on court orders) to victims of conversion by the persons attempting the conversion, and double punishment for repeat offences. Marriages conducted with the intention of conversion can be declared null and void by a family court or a jurisdictional court. The offence of conversion has been deemed to be a cognisable and non-bailable, that can be tried in a magistrates court under the proposed law.Any person intending to convert to another religion after the law comes into force will have to notify the district magistrate two months in advance. "The person who is carrying out the conversion must provide one month notice, and the district magistrate must conduct an enquiry through the police on the real purpose of the conversion", says the draft bill. Not informing the authorities will result in a prison term of six months to three years for persons who convert, and a term of one to five years for those carrying out conversions.The bill also requires the person who gets converted to inform the district magistrate of the conversion within 30 days, and he/she must appear before the district magistrate to confirm their identity. Not informing the district magistrate will lead to the conversion being declared null and void.[Extracted with edits and revisions from, Explained: What does Karnatakas contentious anti-conversion Bill propose?, The Indian Express]Q.A person got another person converted to his religion through fraud, and now the fraudulently converted person has written a letter to the district magistrate for compensation. Can the district magistrate award compensation?

View answer

Which of the following statements does not hold true for the confessions made to the Magistrate under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem’ is a Latin phrase which means ‘hear the other side’. It is the principle that no person should be judged without a fair hearing.Fact Situation: Sanjay, in Delhi, is accused of theft and brought before the Court. The magistrate discovers that Sanjay is mute.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above? Options:a)The principle is not applicable to Sanjay since he is mute.b)The principle is applicable to Sanjay even though he cannot speak since he can be asked to write down his defence.c)The Magistrate has to take all measures to understand what Sanjay has to convey about the accusation against him.d)Since it is a Latin principle it is not applicable in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem’ is a Latin phrase which means ‘hear the other side’. It is the principle that no person should be judged without a fair hearing.Fact Situation: Sanjay, in Delhi, is accused of theft and brought before the Court. The magistrate discovers that Sanjay is mute.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above? Options:a)The principle is not applicable to Sanjay since he is mute.b)The principle is applicable to Sanjay even though he cannot speak since he can be asked to write down his defence.c)The Magistrate has to take all measures to understand what Sanjay has to convey about the accusation against him.d)Since it is a Latin principle it is not applicable in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem’ is a Latin phrase which means ‘hear the other side’. It is the principle that no person should be judged without a fair hearing.Fact Situation: Sanjay, in Delhi, is accused of theft and brought before the Court. The magistrate discovers that Sanjay is mute.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above? Options:a)The principle is not applicable to Sanjay since he is mute.b)The principle is applicable to Sanjay even though he cannot speak since he can be asked to write down his defence.c)The Magistrate has to take all measures to understand what Sanjay has to convey about the accusation against him.d)Since it is a Latin principle it is not applicable in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem’ is a Latin phrase which means ‘hear the other side’. It is the principle that no person should be judged without a fair hearing.Fact Situation: Sanjay, in Delhi, is accused of theft and brought before the Court. The magistrate discovers that Sanjay is mute.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above? Options:a)The principle is not applicable to Sanjay since he is mute.b)The principle is applicable to Sanjay even though he cannot speak since he can be asked to write down his defence.c)The Magistrate has to take all measures to understand what Sanjay has to convey about the accusation against him.d)Since it is a Latin principle it is not applicable in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem’ is a Latin phrase which means ‘hear the other side’. It is the principle that no person should be judged without a fair hearing.Fact Situation: Sanjay, in Delhi, is accused of theft and brought before the Court. The magistrate discovers that Sanjay is mute.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above? Options:a)The principle is not applicable to Sanjay since he is mute.b)The principle is applicable to Sanjay even though he cannot speak since he can be asked to write down his defence.c)The Magistrate has to take all measures to understand what Sanjay has to convey about the accusation against him.d)Since it is a Latin principle it is not applicable in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem’ is a Latin phrase which means ‘hear the other side’. It is the principle that no person should be judged without a fair hearing.Fact Situation: Sanjay, in Delhi, is accused of theft and brought before the Court. The magistrate discovers that Sanjay is mute.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above? Options:a)The principle is not applicable to Sanjay since he is mute.b)The principle is applicable to Sanjay even though he cannot speak since he can be asked to write down his defence.c)The Magistrate has to take all measures to understand what Sanjay has to convey about the accusation against him.d)Since it is a Latin principle it is not applicable in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem’ is a Latin phrase which means ‘hear the other side’. It is the principle that no person should be judged without a fair hearing.Fact Situation: Sanjay, in Delhi, is accused of theft and brought before the Court. The magistrate discovers that Sanjay is mute.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above? Options:a)The principle is not applicable to Sanjay since he is mute.b)The principle is applicable to Sanjay even though he cannot speak since he can be asked to write down his defence.c)The Magistrate has to take all measures to understand what Sanjay has to convey about the accusation against him.d)Since it is a Latin principle it is not applicable in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem’ is a Latin phrase which means ‘hear the other side’. It is the principle that no person should be judged without a fair hearing.Fact Situation: Sanjay, in Delhi, is accused of theft and brought before the Court. The magistrate discovers that Sanjay is mute.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above? Options:a)The principle is not applicable to Sanjay since he is mute.b)The principle is applicable to Sanjay even though he cannot speak since he can be asked to write down his defence.c)The Magistrate has to take all measures to understand what Sanjay has to convey about the accusation against him.d)Since it is a Latin principle it is not applicable in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem’ is a Latin phrase which means ‘hear the other side’. It is the principle that no person should be judged without a fair hearing.Fact Situation: Sanjay, in Delhi, is accused of theft and brought before the Court. The magistrate discovers that Sanjay is mute.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above? Options:a)The principle is not applicable to Sanjay since he is mute.b)The principle is applicable to Sanjay even though he cannot speak since he can be asked to write down his defence.c)The Magistrate has to take all measures to understand what Sanjay has to convey about the accusation against him.d)Since it is a Latin principle it is not applicable in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem’ is a Latin phrase which means ‘hear the other side’. It is the principle that no person should be judged without a fair hearing.Fact Situation: Sanjay, in Delhi, is accused of theft and brought before the Court. The magistrate discovers that Sanjay is mute.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above? Options:a)The principle is not applicable to Sanjay since he is mute.b)The principle is applicable to Sanjay even though he cannot speak since he can be asked to write down his defence.c)The Magistrate has to take all measures to understand what Sanjay has to convey about the accusation against him.d)Since it is a Latin principle it is not applicable in India.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam