All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  “Legal equality” under the Consti... Start Learning for Free
“Legal equality” under the Constitution of India implies that
  • a)
    there should be equality amongst equals and inequality among unnequals.
  • b)
    everybody is equal before law.
  • c)
    the State cannot enact different laws for different groups of people.
  • d)
    there should be no special law for any category of people.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Verified Answer
“Legal equality” under the Constitution of India implies t...
“Equal protection of law” has been given in article 14 of our Indian constitution which has been taken from section 1 of the 14th amendment act of the constitution of the united state. Meaning of equal protection of law: here, it means that each person within the territory of India will get equal Protection of laws.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
“Legal equality” under the Constitution of India implies t...
I'm sorry, I don't understand your question. Could you please rephrase it?
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
“Legal equality” under the Constitution of India implies t...
The "legal equality" under Article 14 of constitution states that Everybody is equal before the law . The law and rights provisioned under the constitution and the law will be equal for everyone regardless of his caste , race , sex or religion . The law will equally protect everyone .
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Right to Equality is the first fundamental right assured to the people of India. Each citizen of India is guaranteed the Right to Equality by Articles 14 to 18 of the Constitution. Article 14 encapsulates the general standards of equality under the watchful eyes of the law and restricts nonsensical and baseless separation between people. The succeeding articles layout explicit utilisation of the general standards set down in Article 14. This article goes over the Right to Equality in India, covering every one of the articles that this right exemplifies. According to Article 14, it is an obligation of the state to not deny to any person equality before the law or equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. Equality is one of the magnificent corner-stones of the Indian democracy.Equality before the law or equal protection of the laws does not mean a similar treatment to everybody. As no two individuals are equal in all regards, a similar treatment to them in each regard would bring about unequal treatment.What Article 14 precludes is class-legislation; however, it doesnt prohibit reasonable classification. The classification, under all circumstances, must not be discretionary or fake or shifty but should be founded on some genuine and significant qualification bearing a fair and reasonable connection to the objective looked to be accomplished by the legislation. Article 14 applies where people who are equal are dealt with contrastingly on no reasonable grounds. In a situation where equals and unequals are treated differently, Article 14 does not come into the picture. As such, this right was considered to be a negative right of an individual not to be discriminated in access to public offices or places or in public matters generally. It did not take account of the existing inequalities arising even from public policies and exercise of public powers. The makers of the Indian Constitution were not satisfied with such type of undertaking. They knew of the widespread social and economic inequalities in the country sanctioned for thousands of years by public policies and exercise of public power supported by religion and other social norms and practices. They were of the opinion that only Article 14 would not be sufficient enough to deal with these inequalities, so they introduced Articles 15-18 which states that nothing shall prevent the State from making any special provision for women and children.Classification to be sensible must satisfy two conditions, one being that the classification must be established on clear differentia which recognises people or things that are assembled from others which are not part of the group and that the differentiation must have a balanced connection to the article looked to be accomplished by the Act.Q.The Parliament passed a Bill stating that all females shall be entitled to a sum of Rs. 10,000 from their husband for their basic necessities. Any breach of this law shall invite a punishment up to 10 years of imprisonment. Decide whether such law is justified.

Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Right to Equality is the first fundamental right assured to the people of India. Each citizen of India is guaranteed the Right to Equality by Articles 14 to 18 of the Constitution. Article 14 encapsulates the general standards of equality under the watchful eyes of the law and restricts nonsensical and baseless separation between people. The succeeding articles layout explicit utilisation of the general standards set down in Article 14. This article goes over the Right to Equality in India, covering every one of the articles that this right exemplifies. According to Article 14, it is an obligation of the state to not deny to any person equality before the law or equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. Equality is one of the magnificent corner-stones of the Indian democracy.Equality before the law or equal protection of the laws does not mean a similar treatment to everybody. As no two individuals are equal in all regards, a similar treatment to them in each regard would bring about unequal treatment.What Article 14 precludes is class-legislation; however, it doesnt prohibit reasonable classification. The classification, under all circumstances, must not be discretionary or fake or shifty but should be founded on some genuine and significant qualification bearing a fair and reasonable connection to the objective looked to be accomplished by the legislation. Article 14 applies where people who are equal are dealt with contrastingly on no reasonable grounds. In a situation where equals and unequals are treated differently, Article 14 does not come into the picture. As such, this right was considered to be a negative right of an individual not to be discriminated in access to public offices or places or in public matters generally. It did not take account of the existing inequalities arising even from public policies and exercise of public powers. The makers of the Indian Constitution were not satisfied with such type of undertaking. They knew of the widespread social and economic inequalities in the country sanctioned for thousands of years by public policies and exercise of public power supported by religion and other social norms and practices. They were of the opinion that only Article 14 would not be sufficient enough to deal with these inequalities, so they introduced Articles 15-18 which states that nothing shall prevent the State from making any special provision for women and children.Classification to be sensible must satisfy two conditions, one being that the classification must be established on clear differentia which recognises people or things that are assembled from others which are not part of the group and that the differentiation must have a balanced connection to the article looked to be accomplished by the Act.Q.The Parliament made a law relating to district-wise seat distribution in the state medical college entrance exam, according to the proportion of the population in a district to the total population of the state. This was challenged as violative of Article 14. Decide.

Directions: Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.Right to Equality is the first fundamental right assured to the people of India. Each citizen of India is guaranteed the Right to Equality by Articles 14 to 18 of the Constitution. Article 14 encapsulates the general standards of equality under the watchful eyes of the law and restricts nonsensical and baseless separation between people. The succeeding articles layout explicit utilisation of the general standards set down in Article 14. This article goes over the Right to Equality in India, covering every one of the articles that this right exemplifies. According to Article 14, it is an obligation of the state to not deny to any person equality before the law or equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. Equality is one of the magnificent corner-stones of the Indian democracy.Equality before the law or equal protection of the laws does not mean a similar treatment to everybody. As no two individuals are equal in all regards, a similar treatment to them in each regard would bring about unequal treatment.What Article 14 precludes is class-legislation; however, it doesnt prohibit reasonable classification. The classification, under all circumstances, must not be discretionary or fake or shifty but should be founded on some genuine and significant qualification bearing a fair and reasonable connection to the objective looked to be accomplished by the legislation. Article 14 applies where people who are equal are dealt with contrastingly on no reasonable grounds. In a situation where equals and unequals are treated differently, Article 14 does not come into the picture. As such, this right was considered to be a negative right of an individual not to be discriminated in access to public offices or places or in public matters generally. It did not take account of the existing inequalities arising even from public policies and exercise of public powers. The makers of the Indian Constitution were not satisfied with such type of undertaking. They knew of the widespread social and economic inequalities in the country sanctioned for thousands of years by public policies and exercise of public power supported by religion and other social norms and practices. They were of the opinion that only Article 14 would not be sufficient enough to deal with these inequalities, so they introduced Articles 15-18 which states that nothing shall prevent the State from making any special provision for women and children.Classification to be sensible must satisfy two conditions, one being that the classification must be established on clear differentia which recognises people or things that are assembled from others which are not part of the group and that the differentiation must have a balanced connection to the article looked to be accomplished by the Act.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Right to equality, blog by Ipleaders]Q.The Parliament approved a bill that grants every woman the right to receive Rs. 10,000 from her husband for basic needs. Any violation of this law will result in a sentence of up to 10 years in jail. Determine whether such a law is appropriate.

Directions: Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.Right to Equality is the first fundamental right assured to the people of India. Each citizen of India is guaranteed the Right to Equality by Articles 14 to 18 of the Constitution. Article 14 encapsulates the general standards of equality under the watchful eyes of the law and restricts nonsensical and baseless separation between people. The succeeding articles layout explicit utilisation of the general standards set down in Article 14. This article goes over the Right to Equality in India, covering every one of the articles that this right exemplifies. According to Article 14, it is an obligation of the state to not deny to any person equality before the law or equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. Equality is one of the magnificent corner-stones of the Indian democracy.Equality before the law or equal protection of the laws does not mean a similar treatment to everybody. As no two individuals are equal in all regards, a similar treatment to them in each regard would bring about unequal treatment.What Article 14 precludes is class-legislation; however, it doesnt prohibit reasonable classification. The classification, under all circumstances, must not be discretionary or fake or shifty but should be founded on some genuine and significant qualification bearing a fair and reasonable connection to the objective looked to be accomplished by the legislation. Article 14 applies where people who are equal are dealt with contrastingly on no reasonable grounds. In a situation where equals and unequals are treated differently, Article 14 does not come into the picture. As such, this right was considered to be a negative right of an individual not to be discriminated in access to public offices or places or in public matters generally. It did not take account of the existing inequalities arising even from public policies and exercise of public powers. The makers of the Indian Constitution were not satisfied with such type of undertaking. They knew of the widespread social and economic inequalities in the country sanctioned for thousands of years by public policies and exercise of public power supported by religion and other social norms and practices. They were of the opinion that only Article 14 would not be sufficient enough to deal with these inequalities, so they introduced Articles 15-18 which states that nothing shall prevent the State from making any special provision for women and children.Classification to be sensible must satisfy two conditions, one being that the classification must be established on clear differentia which recognises people or things that are assembled from others which are not part of the group and that the differentiation must have a balanced connection to the article looked to be accomplished by the Act.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Right to equality, blog by Ipleaders]Q.A law was enacted, stipulating that historically marginalized groups are entitled to a 10% reservation in government jobs as a means of advancing their socio-economic status. This provision was contested on the grounds of potential discrimination against other segments of the population. Evaluate the validity of this law.

The state does not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. Protection, prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. Prof. Dicey, explaining the concept of legal equality as it operated in England, said: “with us every official, from the prime minister down to a constable or a collector of taxes, is under the same responsibility for every act done without any legal justification as any other citizen.” The phrase “equality to the law” finds a place in all written constitutions that guarantees fundamental rights. “All individuals irrespective of birth, religion, sex, or race are equal before law; that is to say, there shall not be any arbitrary discrimination between one individual or class of individuals and another.” “All citizens shall, as human persons he held equal before law.” “All inhabitants of the republic are assured equality before the laws.” Patanjali Sastri, C.J., has expressed that the second expression is corollary of the first and it is difficult to imagine a situation in which the violation of laws will not be the violation of equality before laws thus, in substance the two expressions mean one and the same thing. According to Dr. Jennings said that: “Equality before the law means that equality among equals the law should be equal for all. And should be equally administered, that like should be treated alike. The right to sue and be sued, to prosecute and prosecuted for the same kind of action should be the same for all citizens of full age and understanding without distinctions of race, religion, wealth, social status or political influence.” To check if there is no violation of right to equality there exists a two stage test: a different set of people are being treated differently. There exists reasonable nexus in the differentiation.Q. Right to equality under article 14 is applicable on?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

“Legal equality” under the Constitution of India implies thata)there should be equality amongst equals and inequality among unnequals.b)everybody is equal before law.c)the State cannot enact different laws for different groups of people.d)there should be no special law for any category of people.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
“Legal equality” under the Constitution of India implies thata)there should be equality amongst equals and inequality among unnequals.b)everybody is equal before law.c)the State cannot enact different laws for different groups of people.d)there should be no special law for any category of people.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about “Legal equality” under the Constitution of India implies thata)there should be equality amongst equals and inequality among unnequals.b)everybody is equal before law.c)the State cannot enact different laws for different groups of people.d)there should be no special law for any category of people.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for “Legal equality” under the Constitution of India implies thata)there should be equality amongst equals and inequality among unnequals.b)everybody is equal before law.c)the State cannot enact different laws for different groups of people.d)there should be no special law for any category of people.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for “Legal equality” under the Constitution of India implies thata)there should be equality amongst equals and inequality among unnequals.b)everybody is equal before law.c)the State cannot enact different laws for different groups of people.d)there should be no special law for any category of people.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of “Legal equality” under the Constitution of India implies thata)there should be equality amongst equals and inequality among unnequals.b)everybody is equal before law.c)the State cannot enact different laws for different groups of people.d)there should be no special law for any category of people.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of “Legal equality” under the Constitution of India implies thata)there should be equality amongst equals and inequality among unnequals.b)everybody is equal before law.c)the State cannot enact different laws for different groups of people.d)there should be no special law for any category of people.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for “Legal equality” under the Constitution of India implies thata)there should be equality amongst equals and inequality among unnequals.b)everybody is equal before law.c)the State cannot enact different laws for different groups of people.d)there should be no special law for any category of people.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of “Legal equality” under the Constitution of India implies thata)there should be equality amongst equals and inequality among unnequals.b)everybody is equal before law.c)the State cannot enact different laws for different groups of people.d)there should be no special law for any category of people.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice “Legal equality” under the Constitution of India implies thata)there should be equality amongst equals and inequality among unnequals.b)everybody is equal before law.c)the State cannot enact different laws for different groups of people.d)there should be no special law for any category of people.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup