Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a roo...
The correct option is A.
As if all roots are flowers that do not means that all flowers are roots, thus only conclusion 1 follows.

View all questions of this test
Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a roo...
Statements :All dusters are bowls.All bowls are shoes.No shoe is a roo...
Understanding the Statements
The provided statements are:
- All dusters are bowls.
- All bowls are shoes.
- No shoe is a root.
- All roots are flowers.
Analyzing the Conclusions
Now let's analyze the conclusions based on the statements:
Conclusion I: No duster is a root.
- Since all dusters are classified as bowls and all bowls are shoes, it follows that all dusters are shoes.
- Given that no shoe is a root, it logically follows that no duster can be a root.
- Therefore, Conclusion I is valid.
Conclusion II: All flowers are roots.
- The statements indicate that all roots are flowers, but they do not imply that all flowers must be roots.
- The relationship does not establish that every flower is a root, only that the roots belong to the category of flowers.
- Consequently, Conclusion II is not valid.
Final Evaluation of Conclusions
From the analysis:
- Conclusion I is true.
- Conclusion II is false.
Hence, the correct answer is:
Option A: If only conclusion I follows.
This deduction is based on logical reasoning from the provided statements, ensuring that we disregard commonly held beliefs while adhering strictly to the given premises.