UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what eco... Start Learning for Free
Passage 1
"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special type of money-making: the sort made possible by political connections. This can range from outright graft to a lack of competition, poor regulation and the transfer of public assets to firms at bargain prices. Well-placed people have made their fortunes this way ever since rulers had enough power to issue profitable licences, permits and contracts to their cronies. In America, this system reached its apogee in the late 19th century, and a long and partially successful struggle against robber barons ensued. Antitrust rules broke monopolies such as John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil. The flow of bribes to senators shrank.
In the emerging world, the past quarter-century has been great for rent-seekers. Soaring property prices have enriched developers who rely on approvals for projects. The commodities boom has inflated the value of oilfields and mines, which are invariably intertwined with the state. Some privatisations have let tycoon's milk monopolies or get assets cheaply. The links between politics and wealth are plainly visible in China, where a third of billionaires are party members.
Capitalism based on rent-seeking is not just unfair, but also bad for long-term growth. As our briefing on India explains, resources are misallocated: crummy roads are often the work of crony firms. Competition is repressed: Mexicans pay too much for their phones. Dynamic new firms are stifled by better-connected incumbents. And if linked to the financing of politics, rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that can let petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldn't underpaid junior officials be?
Q. The reason petty corruption in politics flourished is :
  • a)
    Because rent heavy capitalism has enriched developers who rely on approval of projects.
  • b)
    Because rent heavy capitalism involving bribing ministers sets such a tone that the junior officials do not hesitate to take bribes.
  • c)
    Because antitrust rules broke monopolies in America in the late 19th century.
  • d)
    Because Mexicans had to pay too much for their phones.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special ty...
The reason petty corruption in politics flourished is because rent heavy capitalism involving bribing ministers sets such a tone that the junior officials do not hesitate to take bribes.
Free Test
Community Answer
Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special ty...
Explanation:

Reason for flourishing petty corruption in politics:
- Rent-heavy capitalism involving bribing ministers sets such a tone: When capitalism is based on rent-seeking, where political connections are used to make money, it creates a culture where bribing ministers and officials becomes common practice. This sets a tone at the top that can lead to petty corruption flourishing, as junior officials may feel justified in taking bribes when their superiors are doing the same.
- Effects of rent-heavy capitalism on corruption:: Rent-heavy capitalism not only leads to unfair distribution of resources and repressed competition but also creates an environment where corruption can thrive. When politicians and top officials are seen to be benefiting from their connections, it can create a culture of corruption that trickles down to lower levels of government.
- Impact on long-term growth:: This culture of corruption can have detrimental effects on long-term growth as resources are misallocated, competition is stifled, and dynamic new firms struggle to compete with well-connected incumbents. This can hinder innovation and economic progress in the long run.
In conclusion, the reason for the flourishing of petty corruption in politics can be attributed to the culture of rent-heavy capitalism, where political connections are used to gain unfair advantages and where corruption at the highest levels sets a tone that permeates through the entire system. This can have negative consequences on the economy and overall growth in the long term.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special type of money-making: the sort made possible by political connections. This can range from outright graft to a lack of competition, poor regulation and the transfer of public assets to firms at bargain prices. Well-placed people have made their fortunes this way ever since rulers had enough power to issue profitable licences, permits and contracts to their cronies. In America, this system reached its apogee in the late 19th century, and a long and partially successful struggle against robber barons ensued. Antitrust rules broke monopolies such as John D. Rockefellers Standard Oil. The flow of bribes to senators shrank.In the emerging world, the past quarter-century has been great for rent-seekers. Soaring property prices have enriched developers who rely on approvals for projects. The commodities boom has inflated the value of oilfields and mines, which are invariably intertwined with the state. Some privatisations have let tycoonsmilk monopolies or get assets cheaply. The links between politics and wealth are plainly visible in China, where a third of billionaires are party members.Capitalism based on rent-seeking is not just unfair, but also bad for long-term growth. As our briefing on India explains, resources are misallocated: crummy roads are often the work of crony firms. Competition is repressed: Mexicans pay too much for their phones. Dynamic new firms are stifled by better-connected incumbents. And if linked to the financing of politics, rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that can let petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldnt underpaid junior officials be?Q. Which of the following is caused by rent heavy Capitalism?1. Competition is repressed2. Inflation occurs3. Bribery flourishes4. Long term growth suffer

Passage 1... more"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special type of money-making: the sort made possible by political connections. This can range from outright graft to a lack of competition, poor regulation and the transfer of public assets to firms at bargain prices. Well-placed people have made their fortunes this way ever since rulers had enough power to issue profitable licences, permits and contracts to their cronies. In America, this system reached its apogee in the late 19th century, and a long and partially successful struggle against robber barons ensued. Antitrust rules broke monopolies such as John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil. The flow of bribes to senators shrank.In the emerging world, the past quarter-century has been great for rent-seekers. Soaring property prices have enriched developers who rely on approvals for projects. The commodities boom has inflated the value of oilfields and mines, which are invariably intertwined with the state. Some privatisations have let tycoon'smilk monopolies or get assets cheaply. The links between politics and wealth are plainly visible in China, where a third of billionaires are party members.Capitalism based on rent-seeking is not just unfair, but also bad for long-term growth. As our briefing on India explains, resources are misallocated: crummy roads are often the work of crony firms. Competition is repressed: Mexicans pay too much for their phones. Dynamic new firms are stifled by better-connected incumbents. And if linked to the financing of politics, rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that can let petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldn't underpaid junior officials be?Q. According to the passage, which of the following statement(s) are not correct?1. The rent seeking system ended the struggle against robber barons in America2. China exemplifies the close relationship between politics and wealt

Directions (Q. 1-8) Read the following two passages and answer the items that follow each passage. Your answers to these items should be based on these passages only. Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special type of money-making: the sort made possible by political connections. This can range from outright graft to a lack of competition, poor regulation and the transfer of public assets to firms at bargain prices. Well-placed people have made their fortunes this way ever since rulers had enough power to issue profitable licences, permits and contracts to their cronies. In America, this system reached its apogee in the late 19th century, and a long and partially successful struggle against robber barons ensued. Antitrust rules broke monopolies such as John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil. The flow of bribes to senators shrank.In the emerging world, the past quarter-century has been great for rent-seekers. Soaring property prices have enriched developers who rely on approvals for projects. The commodities boom has inflated the value of oilfields and mines, which are invariably intertwined with the state. Some privatisations have let tycoon's milk monopolies or get assets cheaply. The links between politics and wealth are plainly visible in China, where a third of billionaires are party members.Capitalism based on rent-seeking is not just unfair, but also bad for long-term growth. As our briefing on India explains, resources are misallocated: crummy roads are often the work of crony firms. Competition is repressed: Mexicans pay too much for their phones. Dynamic new firms are stifled by better-connected incumbents. And if linked to the financing of politics, rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that can let petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldn't underpaid junior officials be?Q. Which of the following statements are valid with reference to the above passage?1. Rent seeking was a fortune maker for the ruler's cronies2. Only politicians can make money by seeking rent.

Top Courses for UPSC

Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special type of money-making: the sort made possible by political connections. This can range from outright graft to a lack of competition, poor regulation and the transfer of public assets to firms at bargain prices. Well-placed people have made their fortunes this way ever since rulers had enough power to issue profitable licences, permits and contracts to their cronies. In America, this system reached its apogee in the late 19th century, and a long and partially successful struggle against robber barons ensued. Antitrust rules broke monopolies such as John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil. The flow of bribes to senators shrank.In the emerging world, the past quarter-century has been great for rent-seekers. Soaring property prices have enriched developers who rely on approvals for projects. The commodities boom has inflated the value of oilfields and mines, which are invariably intertwined with the state. Some privatisations have let tycoon'smilk monopolies or get assets cheaply. The links between politics and wealth are plainly visible in China, where a third of billionaires are party members.Capitalism based on rent-seeking is not just unfair, but also bad for long-term growth. As our briefing on India explains, resources are misallocated: crummy roads are often the work of crony firms. Competition is repressed: Mexicans pay too much for their phones. Dynamic new firms are stifled by better-connected incumbents. And if linked to the financing of politics, rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that can let petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldn't underpaid junior officials be?Q. The reason petty corruption in politics flourished is :a)Because rent heavy capitalism has enriched developers who rely on approval of projects.b)Because rent heavy capitalism involving bribing ministers sets such a tone that the junior officials do nothesitate to take bribes.c)Because antitrust rules broke monopolies in America in the late 19th century.d)Because Mexicans had to pay too much for their phones.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special type of money-making: the sort made possible by political connections. This can range from outright graft to a lack of competition, poor regulation and the transfer of public assets to firms at bargain prices. Well-placed people have made their fortunes this way ever since rulers had enough power to issue profitable licences, permits and contracts to their cronies. In America, this system reached its apogee in the late 19th century, and a long and partially successful struggle against robber barons ensued. Antitrust rules broke monopolies such as John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil. The flow of bribes to senators shrank.In the emerging world, the past quarter-century has been great for rent-seekers. Soaring property prices have enriched developers who rely on approvals for projects. The commodities boom has inflated the value of oilfields and mines, which are invariably intertwined with the state. Some privatisations have let tycoon'smilk monopolies or get assets cheaply. The links between politics and wealth are plainly visible in China, where a third of billionaires are party members.Capitalism based on rent-seeking is not just unfair, but also bad for long-term growth. As our briefing on India explains, resources are misallocated: crummy roads are often the work of crony firms. Competition is repressed: Mexicans pay too much for their phones. Dynamic new firms are stifled by better-connected incumbents. And if linked to the financing of politics, rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that can let petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldn't underpaid junior officials be?Q. The reason petty corruption in politics flourished is :a)Because rent heavy capitalism has enriched developers who rely on approval of projects.b)Because rent heavy capitalism involving bribing ministers sets such a tone that the junior officials do nothesitate to take bribes.c)Because antitrust rules broke monopolies in America in the late 19th century.d)Because Mexicans had to pay too much for their phones.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special type of money-making: the sort made possible by political connections. This can range from outright graft to a lack of competition, poor regulation and the transfer of public assets to firms at bargain prices. Well-placed people have made their fortunes this way ever since rulers had enough power to issue profitable licences, permits and contracts to their cronies. In America, this system reached its apogee in the late 19th century, and a long and partially successful struggle against robber barons ensued. Antitrust rules broke monopolies such as John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil. The flow of bribes to senators shrank.In the emerging world, the past quarter-century has been great for rent-seekers. Soaring property prices have enriched developers who rely on approvals for projects. The commodities boom has inflated the value of oilfields and mines, which are invariably intertwined with the state. Some privatisations have let tycoon'smilk monopolies or get assets cheaply. The links between politics and wealth are plainly visible in China, where a third of billionaires are party members.Capitalism based on rent-seeking is not just unfair, but also bad for long-term growth. As our briefing on India explains, resources are misallocated: crummy roads are often the work of crony firms. Competition is repressed: Mexicans pay too much for their phones. Dynamic new firms are stifled by better-connected incumbents. And if linked to the financing of politics, rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that can let petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldn't underpaid junior officials be?Q. The reason petty corruption in politics flourished is :a)Because rent heavy capitalism has enriched developers who rely on approval of projects.b)Because rent heavy capitalism involving bribing ministers sets such a tone that the junior officials do nothesitate to take bribes.c)Because antitrust rules broke monopolies in America in the late 19th century.d)Because Mexicans had to pay too much for their phones.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special type of money-making: the sort made possible by political connections. This can range from outright graft to a lack of competition, poor regulation and the transfer of public assets to firms at bargain prices. Well-placed people have made their fortunes this way ever since rulers had enough power to issue profitable licences, permits and contracts to their cronies. In America, this system reached its apogee in the late 19th century, and a long and partially successful struggle against robber barons ensued. Antitrust rules broke monopolies such as John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil. The flow of bribes to senators shrank.In the emerging world, the past quarter-century has been great for rent-seekers. Soaring property prices have enriched developers who rely on approvals for projects. The commodities boom has inflated the value of oilfields and mines, which are invariably intertwined with the state. Some privatisations have let tycoon'smilk monopolies or get assets cheaply. The links between politics and wealth are plainly visible in China, where a third of billionaires are party members.Capitalism based on rent-seeking is not just unfair, but also bad for long-term growth. As our briefing on India explains, resources are misallocated: crummy roads are often the work of crony firms. Competition is repressed: Mexicans pay too much for their phones. Dynamic new firms are stifled by better-connected incumbents. And if linked to the financing of politics, rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that can let petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldn't underpaid junior officials be?Q. The reason petty corruption in politics flourished is :a)Because rent heavy capitalism has enriched developers who rely on approval of projects.b)Because rent heavy capitalism involving bribing ministers sets such a tone that the junior officials do nothesitate to take bribes.c)Because antitrust rules broke monopolies in America in the late 19th century.d)Because Mexicans had to pay too much for their phones.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special type of money-making: the sort made possible by political connections. This can range from outright graft to a lack of competition, poor regulation and the transfer of public assets to firms at bargain prices. Well-placed people have made their fortunes this way ever since rulers had enough power to issue profitable licences, permits and contracts to their cronies. In America, this system reached its apogee in the late 19th century, and a long and partially successful struggle against robber barons ensued. Antitrust rules broke monopolies such as John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil. The flow of bribes to senators shrank.In the emerging world, the past quarter-century has been great for rent-seekers. Soaring property prices have enriched developers who rely on approvals for projects. The commodities boom has inflated the value of oilfields and mines, which are invariably intertwined with the state. Some privatisations have let tycoon'smilk monopolies or get assets cheaply. The links between politics and wealth are plainly visible in China, where a third of billionaires are party members.Capitalism based on rent-seeking is not just unfair, but also bad for long-term growth. As our briefing on India explains, resources are misallocated: crummy roads are often the work of crony firms. Competition is repressed: Mexicans pay too much for their phones. Dynamic new firms are stifled by better-connected incumbents. And if linked to the financing of politics, rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that can let petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldn't underpaid junior officials be?Q. The reason petty corruption in politics flourished is :a)Because rent heavy capitalism has enriched developers who rely on approval of projects.b)Because rent heavy capitalism involving bribing ministers sets such a tone that the junior officials do nothesitate to take bribes.c)Because antitrust rules broke monopolies in America in the late 19th century.d)Because Mexicans had to pay too much for their phones.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special type of money-making: the sort made possible by political connections. This can range from outright graft to a lack of competition, poor regulation and the transfer of public assets to firms at bargain prices. Well-placed people have made their fortunes this way ever since rulers had enough power to issue profitable licences, permits and contracts to their cronies. In America, this system reached its apogee in the late 19th century, and a long and partially successful struggle against robber barons ensued. Antitrust rules broke monopolies such as John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil. The flow of bribes to senators shrank.In the emerging world, the past quarter-century has been great for rent-seekers. Soaring property prices have enriched developers who rely on approvals for projects. The commodities boom has inflated the value of oilfields and mines, which are invariably intertwined with the state. Some privatisations have let tycoon'smilk monopolies or get assets cheaply. The links between politics and wealth are plainly visible in China, where a third of billionaires are party members.Capitalism based on rent-seeking is not just unfair, but also bad for long-term growth. As our briefing on India explains, resources are misallocated: crummy roads are often the work of crony firms. Competition is repressed: Mexicans pay too much for their phones. Dynamic new firms are stifled by better-connected incumbents. And if linked to the financing of politics, rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that can let petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldn't underpaid junior officials be?Q. The reason petty corruption in politics flourished is :a)Because rent heavy capitalism has enriched developers who rely on approval of projects.b)Because rent heavy capitalism involving bribing ministers sets such a tone that the junior officials do nothesitate to take bribes.c)Because antitrust rules broke monopolies in America in the late 19th century.d)Because Mexicans had to pay too much for their phones.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special type of money-making: the sort made possible by political connections. This can range from outright graft to a lack of competition, poor regulation and the transfer of public assets to firms at bargain prices. Well-placed people have made their fortunes this way ever since rulers had enough power to issue profitable licences, permits and contracts to their cronies. In America, this system reached its apogee in the late 19th century, and a long and partially successful struggle against robber barons ensued. Antitrust rules broke monopolies such as John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil. The flow of bribes to senators shrank.In the emerging world, the past quarter-century has been great for rent-seekers. Soaring property prices have enriched developers who rely on approvals for projects. The commodities boom has inflated the value of oilfields and mines, which are invariably intertwined with the state. Some privatisations have let tycoon'smilk monopolies or get assets cheaply. The links between politics and wealth are plainly visible in China, where a third of billionaires are party members.Capitalism based on rent-seeking is not just unfair, but also bad for long-term growth. As our briefing on India explains, resources are misallocated: crummy roads are often the work of crony firms. Competition is repressed: Mexicans pay too much for their phones. Dynamic new firms are stifled by better-connected incumbents. And if linked to the financing of politics, rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that can let petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldn't underpaid junior officials be?Q. The reason petty corruption in politics flourished is :a)Because rent heavy capitalism has enriched developers who rely on approval of projects.b)Because rent heavy capitalism involving bribing ministers sets such a tone that the junior officials do nothesitate to take bribes.c)Because antitrust rules broke monopolies in America in the late 19th century.d)Because Mexicans had to pay too much for their phones.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special type of money-making: the sort made possible by political connections. This can range from outright graft to a lack of competition, poor regulation and the transfer of public assets to firms at bargain prices. Well-placed people have made their fortunes this way ever since rulers had enough power to issue profitable licences, permits and contracts to their cronies. In America, this system reached its apogee in the late 19th century, and a long and partially successful struggle against robber barons ensued. Antitrust rules broke monopolies such as John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil. The flow of bribes to senators shrank.In the emerging world, the past quarter-century has been great for rent-seekers. Soaring property prices have enriched developers who rely on approvals for projects. The commodities boom has inflated the value of oilfields and mines, which are invariably intertwined with the state. Some privatisations have let tycoon'smilk monopolies or get assets cheaply. The links between politics and wealth are plainly visible in China, where a third of billionaires are party members.Capitalism based on rent-seeking is not just unfair, but also bad for long-term growth. As our briefing on India explains, resources are misallocated: crummy roads are often the work of crony firms. Competition is repressed: Mexicans pay too much for their phones. Dynamic new firms are stifled by better-connected incumbents. And if linked to the financing of politics, rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that can let petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldn't underpaid junior officials be?Q. The reason petty corruption in politics flourished is :a)Because rent heavy capitalism has enriched developers who rely on approval of projects.b)Because rent heavy capitalism involving bribing ministers sets such a tone that the junior officials do nothesitate to take bribes.c)Because antitrust rules broke monopolies in America in the late 19th century.d)Because Mexicans had to pay too much for their phones.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special type of money-making: the sort made possible by political connections. This can range from outright graft to a lack of competition, poor regulation and the transfer of public assets to firms at bargain prices. Well-placed people have made their fortunes this way ever since rulers had enough power to issue profitable licences, permits and contracts to their cronies. In America, this system reached its apogee in the late 19th century, and a long and partially successful struggle against robber barons ensued. Antitrust rules broke monopolies such as John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil. The flow of bribes to senators shrank.In the emerging world, the past quarter-century has been great for rent-seekers. Soaring property prices have enriched developers who rely on approvals for projects. The commodities boom has inflated the value of oilfields and mines, which are invariably intertwined with the state. Some privatisations have let tycoon'smilk monopolies or get assets cheaply. The links between politics and wealth are plainly visible in China, where a third of billionaires are party members.Capitalism based on rent-seeking is not just unfair, but also bad for long-term growth. As our briefing on India explains, resources are misallocated: crummy roads are often the work of crony firms. Competition is repressed: Mexicans pay too much for their phones. Dynamic new firms are stifled by better-connected incumbents. And if linked to the financing of politics, rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that can let petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldn't underpaid junior officials be?Q. The reason petty corruption in politics flourished is :a)Because rent heavy capitalism has enriched developers who rely on approval of projects.b)Because rent heavy capitalism involving bribing ministers sets such a tone that the junior officials do nothesitate to take bribes.c)Because antitrust rules broke monopolies in America in the late 19th century.d)Because Mexicans had to pay too much for their phones.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Passage 1"Rent-seeking" is what economists call a special type of money-making: the sort made possible by political connections. This can range from outright graft to a lack of competition, poor regulation and the transfer of public assets to firms at bargain prices. Well-placed people have made their fortunes this way ever since rulers had enough power to issue profitable licences, permits and contracts to their cronies. In America, this system reached its apogee in the late 19th century, and a long and partially successful struggle against robber barons ensued. Antitrust rules broke monopolies such as John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil. The flow of bribes to senators shrank.In the emerging world, the past quarter-century has been great for rent-seekers. Soaring property prices have enriched developers who rely on approvals for projects. The commodities boom has inflated the value of oilfields and mines, which are invariably intertwined with the state. Some privatisations have let tycoon'smilk monopolies or get assets cheaply. The links between politics and wealth are plainly visible in China, where a third of billionaires are party members.Capitalism based on rent-seeking is not just unfair, but also bad for long-term growth. As our briefing on India explains, resources are misallocated: crummy roads are often the work of crony firms. Competition is repressed: Mexicans pay too much for their phones. Dynamic new firms are stifled by better-connected incumbents. And if linked to the financing of politics, rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that can let petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldn't underpaid junior officials be?Q. The reason petty corruption in politics flourished is :a)Because rent heavy capitalism has enriched developers who rely on approval of projects.b)Because rent heavy capitalism involving bribing ministers sets such a tone that the junior officials do nothesitate to take bribes.c)Because antitrust rules broke monopolies in America in the late 19th century.d)Because Mexicans had to pay too much for their phones.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev