Principle: An agreement to do an act impossible in itself is void.Fact...
The correct option is B as according to the principle applied the act itself is void
View all questions of this test
Principle: An agreement to do an act impossible in itself is void.Fact...
Explanation:
The principle states that an agreement to do an act that is impossible in itself is void. In this case, Rajdeep and Karan entered into an agreement where Karan would be paid a certain amount if he caught a live anaconda in the Gir Forest area of India within a year. However, it is a well-known fact that anacondas are endemic to South America and not found in India.
Analysis:
Given the facts of the case and the principle, let's analyze the agreement and its validity.
1. Agreement to do an impossible act:
The agreement between Rajdeep and Karan involves catching a live anaconda in the Gir Forest area of India. However, as mentioned earlier, anacondas are not found in India. Therefore, catching a live anaconda in India is an impossible act.
2. Void agreement:
According to the principle, an agreement to do an act impossible in itself is void. Since catching a live anaconda in the Gir Forest area of India is impossible, the agreement between Rajdeep and Karan is void.
3. Legal consequences:
The fact that the agreement is void means that both parties are not legally bound to honor their commitments. Neither Rajdeep nor Karan can enforce the terms of the agreement in a court of law.
4. Illegality and danger:
While the agreement is void due to impossibility, it is important to note that attempting to catch a wild animal like an anaconda can be illegal and dangerous. In this case, the agreement does not explicitly mention any illegal or dangerous activities, but it is important to exercise caution and follow legal guidelines when dealing with wildlife.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the agreement between Rajdeep and Karan is void because it involves an impossible act. Both parties are not legally bound to honor their commitments. It is also important to consider the legal and safety aspects when dealing with wildlife.
Principle: An agreement to do an act impossible in itself is void.Fact...
Option B because act was impossible in itself.