Question Description
The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: “Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his house.b)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, he should have realized Jevvan’s delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: “Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his house.b)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, he should have realized Jevvan’s delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: “Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his house.b)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, he should have realized Jevvan’s delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: “Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his house.b)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, he should have realized Jevvan’s delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: “Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his house.b)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, he should have realized Jevvan’s delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: “Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his house.b)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, he should have realized Jevvan’s delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: “Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his house.b)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, he should have realized Jevvan’s delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: “Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his house.b)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, he should have realized Jevvan’s delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q.PRINCIPLE: “Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his house.b)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, he should have realized Jevvan’s delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.