Question Description
Directions: Given below is a statement of legal principle, followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer among the alternatives.Principle 'Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation'.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan, who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, heshould have realised Seevan's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above Using the standards of a reasonable man, the sound of typing cannot be said as disturbing and hence it is a reasonable one.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Given below is a statement of legal principle, followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer among the alternatives.Principle 'Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation'.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan, who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, heshould have realised Seevan's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above Using the standards of a reasonable man, the sound of typing cannot be said as disturbing and hence it is a reasonable one.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Given below is a statement of legal principle, followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer among the alternatives.Principle 'Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation'.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan, who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, heshould have realised Seevan's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above Using the standards of a reasonable man, the sound of typing cannot be said as disturbing and hence it is a reasonable one.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Given below is a statement of legal principle, followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer among the alternatives.Principle 'Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation'.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan, who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, heshould have realised Seevan's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above Using the standards of a reasonable man, the sound of typing cannot be said as disturbing and hence it is a reasonable one.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Given below is a statement of legal principle, followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer among the alternatives.Principle 'Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation'.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan, who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, heshould have realised Seevan's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above Using the standards of a reasonable man, the sound of typing cannot be said as disturbing and hence it is a reasonable one.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Given below is a statement of legal principle, followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer among the alternatives.Principle 'Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation'.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan, who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, heshould have realised Seevan's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above Using the standards of a reasonable man, the sound of typing cannot be said as disturbing and hence it is a reasonable one.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Given below is a statement of legal principle, followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer among the alternatives.Principle 'Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation'.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan, who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, heshould have realised Seevan's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above Using the standards of a reasonable man, the sound of typing cannot be said as disturbing and hence it is a reasonable one.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Given below is a statement of legal principle, followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer among the alternatives.Principle 'Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation'.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan, who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, heshould have realised Seevan's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above Using the standards of a reasonable man, the sound of typing cannot be said as disturbing and hence it is a reasonable one.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Given below is a statement of legal principle, followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer among the alternatives.Principle 'Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation'.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan, who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, heshould have realised Seevan's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevand)None of the above Using the standards of a reasonable man, the sound of typing cannot be said as disturbing and hence it is a reasonable one.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.