Question Description
PRINCIPLE:Any agreement in absolute restraint of the marriage of any person is void.FACTS: Zoya and Benazir are both married to Azhar. He dies in October 2012, reducing them both to the status of co-widows. When Azhar’s will is read out, they discover a clause which states that if either of the co-widows remarry, they would be deemed to have forfeited their claim to any property or maintenance. However, Benazir gets married in February, 2013 and claims her share of maintenance and property, from Azhar’s lawyer, claiming that any clause in restraint of marriage is void. Hence, she should be entitled to maintenance. Decide.a)The clause in the will is valid and Benazir is not entitled to any maintenanceb)The clause is void, by virtue of being in restraint of marriagec)Zoya should be given the authority to decide whether Benazir can claim maintenance or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE:Any agreement in absolute restraint of the marriage of any person is void.FACTS: Zoya and Benazir are both married to Azhar. He dies in October 2012, reducing them both to the status of co-widows. When Azhar’s will is read out, they discover a clause which states that if either of the co-widows remarry, they would be deemed to have forfeited their claim to any property or maintenance. However, Benazir gets married in February, 2013 and claims her share of maintenance and property, from Azhar’s lawyer, claiming that any clause in restraint of marriage is void. Hence, she should be entitled to maintenance. Decide.a)The clause in the will is valid and Benazir is not entitled to any maintenanceb)The clause is void, by virtue of being in restraint of marriagec)Zoya should be given the authority to decide whether Benazir can claim maintenance or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE:Any agreement in absolute restraint of the marriage of any person is void.FACTS: Zoya and Benazir are both married to Azhar. He dies in October 2012, reducing them both to the status of co-widows. When Azhar’s will is read out, they discover a clause which states that if either of the co-widows remarry, they would be deemed to have forfeited their claim to any property or maintenance. However, Benazir gets married in February, 2013 and claims her share of maintenance and property, from Azhar’s lawyer, claiming that any clause in restraint of marriage is void. Hence, she should be entitled to maintenance. Decide.a)The clause in the will is valid and Benazir is not entitled to any maintenanceb)The clause is void, by virtue of being in restraint of marriagec)Zoya should be given the authority to decide whether Benazir can claim maintenance or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for PRINCIPLE:Any agreement in absolute restraint of the marriage of any person is void.FACTS: Zoya and Benazir are both married to Azhar. He dies in October 2012, reducing them both to the status of co-widows. When Azhar’s will is read out, they discover a clause which states that if either of the co-widows remarry, they would be deemed to have forfeited their claim to any property or maintenance. However, Benazir gets married in February, 2013 and claims her share of maintenance and property, from Azhar’s lawyer, claiming that any clause in restraint of marriage is void. Hence, she should be entitled to maintenance. Decide.a)The clause in the will is valid and Benazir is not entitled to any maintenanceb)The clause is void, by virtue of being in restraint of marriagec)Zoya should be given the authority to decide whether Benazir can claim maintenance or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of PRINCIPLE:Any agreement in absolute restraint of the marriage of any person is void.FACTS: Zoya and Benazir are both married to Azhar. He dies in October 2012, reducing them both to the status of co-widows. When Azhar’s will is read out, they discover a clause which states that if either of the co-widows remarry, they would be deemed to have forfeited their claim to any property or maintenance. However, Benazir gets married in February, 2013 and claims her share of maintenance and property, from Azhar’s lawyer, claiming that any clause in restraint of marriage is void. Hence, she should be entitled to maintenance. Decide.a)The clause in the will is valid and Benazir is not entitled to any maintenanceb)The clause is void, by virtue of being in restraint of marriagec)Zoya should be given the authority to decide whether Benazir can claim maintenance or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of PRINCIPLE:Any agreement in absolute restraint of the marriage of any person is void.FACTS: Zoya and Benazir are both married to Azhar. He dies in October 2012, reducing them both to the status of co-widows. When Azhar’s will is read out, they discover a clause which states that if either of the co-widows remarry, they would be deemed to have forfeited their claim to any property or maintenance. However, Benazir gets married in February, 2013 and claims her share of maintenance and property, from Azhar’s lawyer, claiming that any clause in restraint of marriage is void. Hence, she should be entitled to maintenance. Decide.a)The clause in the will is valid and Benazir is not entitled to any maintenanceb)The clause is void, by virtue of being in restraint of marriagec)Zoya should be given the authority to decide whether Benazir can claim maintenance or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PRINCIPLE:Any agreement in absolute restraint of the marriage of any person is void.FACTS: Zoya and Benazir are both married to Azhar. He dies in October 2012, reducing them both to the status of co-widows. When Azhar’s will is read out, they discover a clause which states that if either of the co-widows remarry, they would be deemed to have forfeited their claim to any property or maintenance. However, Benazir gets married in February, 2013 and claims her share of maintenance and property, from Azhar’s lawyer, claiming that any clause in restraint of marriage is void. Hence, she should be entitled to maintenance. Decide.a)The clause in the will is valid and Benazir is not entitled to any maintenanceb)The clause is void, by virtue of being in restraint of marriagec)Zoya should be given the authority to decide whether Benazir can claim maintenance or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PRINCIPLE:Any agreement in absolute restraint of the marriage of any person is void.FACTS: Zoya and Benazir are both married to Azhar. He dies in October 2012, reducing them both to the status of co-widows. When Azhar’s will is read out, they discover a clause which states that if either of the co-widows remarry, they would be deemed to have forfeited their claim to any property or maintenance. However, Benazir gets married in February, 2013 and claims her share of maintenance and property, from Azhar’s lawyer, claiming that any clause in restraint of marriage is void. Hence, she should be entitled to maintenance. Decide.a)The clause in the will is valid and Benazir is not entitled to any maintenanceb)The clause is void, by virtue of being in restraint of marriagec)Zoya should be given the authority to decide whether Benazir can claim maintenance or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice PRINCIPLE:Any agreement in absolute restraint of the marriage of any person is void.FACTS: Zoya and Benazir are both married to Azhar. He dies in October 2012, reducing them both to the status of co-widows. When Azhar’s will is read out, they discover a clause which states that if either of the co-widows remarry, they would be deemed to have forfeited their claim to any property or maintenance. However, Benazir gets married in February, 2013 and claims her share of maintenance and property, from Azhar’s lawyer, claiming that any clause in restraint of marriage is void. Hence, she should be entitled to maintenance. Decide.a)The clause in the will is valid and Benazir is not entitled to any maintenanceb)The clause is void, by virtue of being in restraint of marriagec)Zoya should be given the authority to decide whether Benazir can claim maintenance or notd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.