Question Description
PRINCIPLE: Res ipsa loquitur, i.e., the thing speaks for itself.FACTS: Seema got herself operated for the removal of her uterus in the defendant’s hospital, as there was diagnosed to be a cyst in one of her ovaries. Due the negligence of the surgeon, who performed the operation, abdominal pack was left in her abdomen. The same was removed by a second surgery.a)Surgeon cannot be held responsible because it is merely a human errorb)Surgeon can be held responsible but Seema will have to prove in the court of law that the surgeon was grossly negligentc)Surgeon will be responsible and Seema need not to prove surgeon’s negligence because presence of abdominal pack in her abdomen is sufficient proof therefored)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE: Res ipsa loquitur, i.e., the thing speaks for itself.FACTS: Seema got herself operated for the removal of her uterus in the defendant’s hospital, as there was diagnosed to be a cyst in one of her ovaries. Due the negligence of the surgeon, who performed the operation, abdominal pack was left in her abdomen. The same was removed by a second surgery.a)Surgeon cannot be held responsible because it is merely a human errorb)Surgeon can be held responsible but Seema will have to prove in the court of law that the surgeon was grossly negligentc)Surgeon will be responsible and Seema need not to prove surgeon’s negligence because presence of abdominal pack in her abdomen is sufficient proof therefored)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE: Res ipsa loquitur, i.e., the thing speaks for itself.FACTS: Seema got herself operated for the removal of her uterus in the defendant’s hospital, as there was diagnosed to be a cyst in one of her ovaries. Due the negligence of the surgeon, who performed the operation, abdominal pack was left in her abdomen. The same was removed by a second surgery.a)Surgeon cannot be held responsible because it is merely a human errorb)Surgeon can be held responsible but Seema will have to prove in the court of law that the surgeon was grossly negligentc)Surgeon will be responsible and Seema need not to prove surgeon’s negligence because presence of abdominal pack in her abdomen is sufficient proof therefored)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for PRINCIPLE: Res ipsa loquitur, i.e., the thing speaks for itself.FACTS: Seema got herself operated for the removal of her uterus in the defendant’s hospital, as there was diagnosed to be a cyst in one of her ovaries. Due the negligence of the surgeon, who performed the operation, abdominal pack was left in her abdomen. The same was removed by a second surgery.a)Surgeon cannot be held responsible because it is merely a human errorb)Surgeon can be held responsible but Seema will have to prove in the court of law that the surgeon was grossly negligentc)Surgeon will be responsible and Seema need not to prove surgeon’s negligence because presence of abdominal pack in her abdomen is sufficient proof therefored)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of PRINCIPLE: Res ipsa loquitur, i.e., the thing speaks for itself.FACTS: Seema got herself operated for the removal of her uterus in the defendant’s hospital, as there was diagnosed to be a cyst in one of her ovaries. Due the negligence of the surgeon, who performed the operation, abdominal pack was left in her abdomen. The same was removed by a second surgery.a)Surgeon cannot be held responsible because it is merely a human errorb)Surgeon can be held responsible but Seema will have to prove in the court of law that the surgeon was grossly negligentc)Surgeon will be responsible and Seema need not to prove surgeon’s negligence because presence of abdominal pack in her abdomen is sufficient proof therefored)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of PRINCIPLE: Res ipsa loquitur, i.e., the thing speaks for itself.FACTS: Seema got herself operated for the removal of her uterus in the defendant’s hospital, as there was diagnosed to be a cyst in one of her ovaries. Due the negligence of the surgeon, who performed the operation, abdominal pack was left in her abdomen. The same was removed by a second surgery.a)Surgeon cannot be held responsible because it is merely a human errorb)Surgeon can be held responsible but Seema will have to prove in the court of law that the surgeon was grossly negligentc)Surgeon will be responsible and Seema need not to prove surgeon’s negligence because presence of abdominal pack in her abdomen is sufficient proof therefored)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PRINCIPLE: Res ipsa loquitur, i.e., the thing speaks for itself.FACTS: Seema got herself operated for the removal of her uterus in the defendant’s hospital, as there was diagnosed to be a cyst in one of her ovaries. Due the negligence of the surgeon, who performed the operation, abdominal pack was left in her abdomen. The same was removed by a second surgery.a)Surgeon cannot be held responsible because it is merely a human errorb)Surgeon can be held responsible but Seema will have to prove in the court of law that the surgeon was grossly negligentc)Surgeon will be responsible and Seema need not to prove surgeon’s negligence because presence of abdominal pack in her abdomen is sufficient proof therefored)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PRINCIPLE: Res ipsa loquitur, i.e., the thing speaks for itself.FACTS: Seema got herself operated for the removal of her uterus in the defendant’s hospital, as there was diagnosed to be a cyst in one of her ovaries. Due the negligence of the surgeon, who performed the operation, abdominal pack was left in her abdomen. The same was removed by a second surgery.a)Surgeon cannot be held responsible because it is merely a human errorb)Surgeon can be held responsible but Seema will have to prove in the court of law that the surgeon was grossly negligentc)Surgeon will be responsible and Seema need not to prove surgeon’s negligence because presence of abdominal pack in her abdomen is sufficient proof therefored)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice PRINCIPLE: Res ipsa loquitur, i.e., the thing speaks for itself.FACTS: Seema got herself operated for the removal of her uterus in the defendant’s hospital, as there was diagnosed to be a cyst in one of her ovaries. Due the negligence of the surgeon, who performed the operation, abdominal pack was left in her abdomen. The same was removed by a second surgery.a)Surgeon cannot be held responsible because it is merely a human errorb)Surgeon can be held responsible but Seema will have to prove in the court of law that the surgeon was grossly negligentc)Surgeon will be responsible and Seema need not to prove surgeon’s negligence because presence of abdominal pack in her abdomen is sufficient proof therefored)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.