Question Description
PRINCIPLE: A person has no legal remedy for an injury caused by an act to which he has consented.FACTS: R, a cricket enthusiast, purchases a ticket to watch a T20 match organized by the Indian Premier League (IPL). During the match, a ball struck for six hits R on his body and injures him. He sues IPL for compensation for the medical expenses. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)R should be compensated as he purchased the ticket to get entertainment and not get injured.b)R would fail in his action, as he voluntarily exposed himself to the risk.c)IPL would be liable as it did not ensure that the spectators were protected from the risk of such injuries.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE: A person has no legal remedy for an injury caused by an act to which he has consented.FACTS: R, a cricket enthusiast, purchases a ticket to watch a T20 match organized by the Indian Premier League (IPL). During the match, a ball struck for six hits R on his body and injures him. He sues IPL for compensation for the medical expenses. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)R should be compensated as he purchased the ticket to get entertainment and not get injured.b)R would fail in his action, as he voluntarily exposed himself to the risk.c)IPL would be liable as it did not ensure that the spectators were protected from the risk of such injuries.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE: A person has no legal remedy for an injury caused by an act to which he has consented.FACTS: R, a cricket enthusiast, purchases a ticket to watch a T20 match organized by the Indian Premier League (IPL). During the match, a ball struck for six hits R on his body and injures him. He sues IPL for compensation for the medical expenses. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)R should be compensated as he purchased the ticket to get entertainment and not get injured.b)R would fail in his action, as he voluntarily exposed himself to the risk.c)IPL would be liable as it did not ensure that the spectators were protected from the risk of such injuries.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for PRINCIPLE: A person has no legal remedy for an injury caused by an act to which he has consented.FACTS: R, a cricket enthusiast, purchases a ticket to watch a T20 match organized by the Indian Premier League (IPL). During the match, a ball struck for six hits R on his body and injures him. He sues IPL for compensation for the medical expenses. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)R should be compensated as he purchased the ticket to get entertainment and not get injured.b)R would fail in his action, as he voluntarily exposed himself to the risk.c)IPL would be liable as it did not ensure that the spectators were protected from the risk of such injuries.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of PRINCIPLE: A person has no legal remedy for an injury caused by an act to which he has consented.FACTS: R, a cricket enthusiast, purchases a ticket to watch a T20 match organized by the Indian Premier League (IPL). During the match, a ball struck for six hits R on his body and injures him. He sues IPL for compensation for the medical expenses. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)R should be compensated as he purchased the ticket to get entertainment and not get injured.b)R would fail in his action, as he voluntarily exposed himself to the risk.c)IPL would be liable as it did not ensure that the spectators were protected from the risk of such injuries.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of PRINCIPLE: A person has no legal remedy for an injury caused by an act to which he has consented.FACTS: R, a cricket enthusiast, purchases a ticket to watch a T20 match organized by the Indian Premier League (IPL). During the match, a ball struck for six hits R on his body and injures him. He sues IPL for compensation for the medical expenses. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)R should be compensated as he purchased the ticket to get entertainment and not get injured.b)R would fail in his action, as he voluntarily exposed himself to the risk.c)IPL would be liable as it did not ensure that the spectators were protected from the risk of such injuries.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PRINCIPLE: A person has no legal remedy for an injury caused by an act to which he has consented.FACTS: R, a cricket enthusiast, purchases a ticket to watch a T20 match organized by the Indian Premier League (IPL). During the match, a ball struck for six hits R on his body and injures him. He sues IPL for compensation for the medical expenses. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)R should be compensated as he purchased the ticket to get entertainment and not get injured.b)R would fail in his action, as he voluntarily exposed himself to the risk.c)IPL would be liable as it did not ensure that the spectators were protected from the risk of such injuries.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PRINCIPLE: A person has no legal remedy for an injury caused by an act to which he has consented.FACTS: R, a cricket enthusiast, purchases a ticket to watch a T20 match organized by the Indian Premier League (IPL). During the match, a ball struck for six hits R on his body and injures him. He sues IPL for compensation for the medical expenses. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)R should be compensated as he purchased the ticket to get entertainment and not get injured.b)R would fail in his action, as he voluntarily exposed himself to the risk.c)IPL would be liable as it did not ensure that the spectators were protected from the risk of such injuries.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice PRINCIPLE: A person has no legal remedy for an injury caused by an act to which he has consented.FACTS: R, a cricket enthusiast, purchases a ticket to watch a T20 match organized by the Indian Premier League (IPL). During the match, a ball struck for six hits R on his body and injures him. He sues IPL for compensation for the medical expenses. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)R should be compensated as he purchased the ticket to get entertainment and not get injured.b)R would fail in his action, as he voluntarily exposed himself to the risk.c)IPL would be liable as it did not ensure that the spectators were protected from the risk of such injuries.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.